Commands Manager GUI [My First Add-On Ever]

[phflack]

When you do CommandToServer('b_clearallbricks'); the client is included automatically

function b_clearallbricks(%client)

am I missing something
I thought b_clearAllBricks did not start with commandToServer


and this whole thread is a bit silly now

[Ad Bot]

[Honorabl3]

am I missing something
I thought b_clearAllBricks did not start with commandToServer


and this whole thread is a bit silly now

DragonoidSlayer is using functions like "b_clearAllBricks" so he can modify what the buttons do from the code. That way he doesn't need to edit the GUI itself (even though editing the GUI is easy, he's pretty new - so it's justified for now).

Surely b_clearAllBricks uses CommandToServer to clear all bricks?

[Goth77]

Surely b_clearAllBricks uses CommandToServer to clear all bricks?

It actually calls another function, do_clearAllBricks();, which then does the CommandToServer('ClearAllBricks');

but ya its the core function

[Dragonoid.Slayer]

am I missing something
I thought b_clearAllBricks did not start with commandToServer


and this whole thread is a bit silly now

B_clearallbricks was a function specific to the buttons, called by the buttons. I did it this way, so just in case I did a command wrong, I didn't have to edit fyi, sage it, then restart my blockland, as I cannot edit out of the mission editor

I am on my phone, and autocorrct is a hitch.

[phflack]

there's nothing wrong with using b_clearAllBricks() as a function name, and nothing wrong with the code it contains

i'm just pointing out that it ISN'T commandToServerB_clearAllBric ks(%client) as goth was saying it is

[Kyuande]

It actually calls another function, do_clearAllBricks();, which then does the CommandToServer('ClearAllBricks');

but ya its the core function

Probably read this wrong, but; we aren't overwriting the function, why do we need to package it?

[jes00]

Probably read this wrong, but; we aren't overwriting the function, why do we need to package it?

We don't need to package it because we aren't overwriting it.

[Goth77]

there's nothing wrong with using b_clearAllBricks() as a function name, and nothing wrong with the code it contains

i'm just pointing out that it ISN'T commandToServerB_clearAllBric ks(%client) as goth was saying it is

You can do it both ways. If you payed any attention to what Honorabl3 and I were discussing; Using CommandToServer in the UI command is just the shorter way of doing it without creating a second function

Probably read this wrong, but; we aren't overwriting the function, why do we need to package it?

It doesn't need packaged, although I supposed you could package it as GameConnection::ClearAllBricks(%this) if you really wanted to modify the way clearing all bricks works (ex: changing the clear message)

For something simple like this it's not really needed tho

[Dragonoid.Slayer]

*bump*
I don't want my first add-on to die. :'c