So, if you haven't heard of this dude already, he's been causing a stir in lord tony's drama recently. and holy loving stuff, if lord tony was at a point obsessed with bronies, then this guy is definitely obsessed with tony. to me, it feels like every single time is see this handicap post its always taking a jab at tony in one way or another. I'll be honest, I'm not making this thread because i feel bad or any sympathy for tony. If tony had any sense he'd shrug anything this dude said off. (and it looks like he has)
I get it, blockchip, you're mad at tony. You just plain hate the guy. That can remain your opinion not like i could stop you anyways. Between the way tony constantly posts, repeats himself, the harvest stuff, i can totally see why you don't him.
But heres the thing. His stuff is
loving everywhere. he has made so many posts about Lord Tony that my only association with him is "the guy that hates lord tony".
The following is every single post that Blockchip has made in relation to Tony that I can find. I'm not putting them in order, highlighting, or replying to any of these posts. I feel the sheer number should speak for itself.
Because i can think of several reasons to not do it and no reasons to do it.
I'd ask you for a reason to do it, but chances are you'll just say "there are plenty of reasons" and then not actually provide any. You do that.
There's a certain point when the "it's just my opinion" excuse is no longer valid;
And you've definitely passed it.
Edit: also seriously, why do you double-post
Either think before you post or use the edit button.
okay this is definitely trolling
Is there any difference between gwinnet ale/brew/lager/etc?
Seriously tony can't you just leave anything at "i personally don't like this"
I'm as mildly annoyed by the inability to kill children as much as the next guy buy you are seriously overblowing this.
You treat every minor problem you have with the game as if it's destroying the industry or something.
This is why people adopt the "just install a mod" attitude: The game can't please everyone, but everyone expects to be pleased. even people like tony who can't be pleased and will basically grasp at any straw he wants for something to complain aboutYou say that so often it's starting to lose it's meaning.
But it's not supposed to be fun, it's supposed to be realistic!
Complaining about something on a forum in which almost nobody wants to hear you doesn't fix developers either.
Please stop treating this forum like a direct hotline to Bethesda.
Also, are you seriously saying that Bethesda is a broken developer that is single-handedly destroying the concepts of creative freedom and choice and harming the games industry because they made games in which you can't rape or kill children?
I really don't see how they're actively trying to not offened anyone by exluding those. They simply don't have a good enough reason to put it in the game.
I'm still baffled as to why you expect hardcore survival realism from fallout 4.
It's a shooter-RPG. It's not supposed to be realistic. It's supposed to be fun.
That's not an example.
Saying "you've been living under a rock if you don't know, happens all the time" isn't an example.
The ESRB cares, and it's nowadays hard to get a game in which you can kill children past them without an adult rating.
It's not really worth the trouble, and it's not like its an active problem destroying creativity, free choice, and the games industry if it doesn't include it.
Nobody said it was.
They just said it's a bit hard to get it past the ESRB.
Which it is.
Honestly, if you care about killing children so much (which i highly doubt you do) just install a mod and shut up about it.
Can you provide an example of this from within the current century?
Isn't that part of the plot of metal gear solid V?
There are child soldiers that specifically use ak-47s and it's a game over if you harm them, even though they try to kill you?
Was that a thing that happened in that game?
Why are people still bumping this thread?
I'm starting to see why people were so annoyed when i kept doing it.
At least when i did it i tried to keep my posts relevant to the original topic and not stuff about alts.
Speaking of alts, can someone PM me the amount of alts tony has gone through?
"Realize"
You can't "realize" an opinion.
Just because you feel really strongly about new vegas being an objectively perfect game and fallout 4 being terrible because it's different doesn't make it a fact.Why not?
This is great.
We can danse all we want to. We can leave your synths behind.
If tony gets voted worst, he'll say "i got first place, i won"
If he doesn't he'll say "I'm not the worst, i won"
I agree with Nonnel.
Being second worst is probably even worse than being first worst.
And besides, second or first, i really don't think tony should be talking as if he's the best just because he isn't the worst.
yes, all of those were stupid.
i sent the third one forgetting i sent the first two because i am stupid.
But it's a really richard move when you're so spiteful of somewhat that you bump a thread that you clearly want to be dead with personal messages from someone the thread isn't supposed to be about.
I really don't see a single reason why you'd take that out of PMs other than spite.
Okay then, neither will i.
Tony stops saying stupid things, i stop replying to stupid things, and tony keeps stuffposting and ruining the fallout 4 thread.
Everyone's happy.Can you make it blue, please?
Thanks.
TableSalt is right
How's that so?
Tony is posting in this thread just as much as me recently (probably more, considering how almost every time he posts here it's a doublepost)But only if specifically you stop posting, blockchip!
Anyone else contributing to this thread, including me, is completely fine!
If i stopped posting here and someone else came in and started posting the exact same things i would've, i'm pretty sure everyone would be completely fine with that.
Gsterman came in here and posted in just about the same manner i did and that was met with the blf equivalent of applause.
I still find it hilarious that i'm constantly accused by tony supporters of grasping at straws and beating dead horses in a drama about tony's actions in the fallout 4 thread.
Also, "i will make sure it's never forgotten".
So, out of pure spite, you're going to intentionally try to ruin my reputation and make sure it never recovers?
Well, i always thought it was a bad thing to intentionally try to make someone suffer as much as within your ability just because you don't like them.
You also post in here a lot.
How are you any better?
How did you continuing to post not make you "immature", "unreasonable", or "irrational"?
That was a question.
Also, i think it's unreasonable to see the first sentence of a post with several sentences, dislike it, and think "the entire post is probably like this"
Can you provide a link to that? I'd quite like to see you specifically predict every name, plot point, and main quest in the game "100%".
Okay.
Do you think that new vegas is literally the perfect game and that "different from new vegas" and "bad" are synonymous?
Almost every "criticism" you have against fallout 4 is either about it being unrealistic or different from new vegas.
I really don't see how me continuing this is any worse than tony or anyone else continuing this.
So you're literally admitting "I think this is a good game, but i hate it anyway because it's made by bethesda"?
I don't think pure quest numbers are a good way of measuring content.
It doesn't take into account the length of the quests, or the amount of things to do that aren't quests.
Besides, "Less content" doesn't mean "worse game".
They're both RPGs made by Bethesda using the same engine.
Can you name any further similarities?
I'm pretty sure if fallout 4 was the exact same game except made by obsidian you'd lay right off it.If you think new vegas is so much better than fallout 4, why don't you stop complaining about fallout 4 and go play that instead?
Because that's the only reason you play a game, for the story.
Gameplay? Pfft!
Also, if you haven't done a single story quest, how do you know the story?
Also, please stop saying you predicted "100%" of the story.
You didn't.
It's like saying you predicted the entirety of star wars by saying "The rebels fight an empire and then they defeat the empire in the end".It's an action shooter-RPG.
The gameplay is based around killing things.
Fallout 4 isn't a real post apocalyptic world.
It's a video game.
The only thing fallout 4 concerns itself with is being fun.
Also, it does have entire gangs that rape, pillage, and kill.
They're called raiders.
I don't see how Bethesda is intentionally trying hard not to offend anyone by not including rape.
I can't think of a way how fallout 4 could've had rape that wouldn't be extremely forced, and i don't think the inclusion of rape would add anything to the game.
I don't see how what i did is any different than what gesterman did, which you responded to with this:
Like i said earlier, it seems to me like you expect fallout 4 to be a realistic hardcore survival game just because it's set in the post-apocalypse.
I don't see why being set in a post-apocalypse means a game HAS to include rape.
Yes, i am 12.
That is my current age.
I'm expecting the next few posts to be among the lines of "that explains a lot" and "haha you're 12, now i can dismiss any point you make based on your age!"
I am not saying that they are stuffposts because i disagree with them.
I didn't mention myself being "harvested" in that post. I do not care that i am "harvested"
And i didn't say that tony was doing anything bannable or against the rules.
I said that i think he is trolling, and i asked whether trolling was bannable. That is it.Again, i didn't say he was doing anything bannable.
And i really feel like him contributing to useful discussion is the minority of the time and not the majority.Are you saying that all of tony's points against fallout 4 are valid ones?
It really doesn't seem like that to me.
I can't think of a single fallout 4 posts that makes a point against the game being good or fun, they only complain that the game isn't realistic or isn't like new vegas, and he always grinds on that complaints, no matter how stupid, for pages and pages.
Multiple times on this thread, when i have said something against tony, people said something along the lines of "hahaha hook line and sinker you idiot"
Here's a bunch of examples.Can you name examples from more than one person on this thread intentionally baiting tony into saying something?It really seems to me like that is your entire argument.
Everything you say here revolves around the assumption that whenever say tony did something i am also saying he should be banned for it, which i am not.
There's a difference between celebrating a rape mod and actively complaining that a game does not include rape, saying that it is a factually bad game because of it.
I think that the very small minority of tony's posts are decently-thought out and that most of them are just grasping at straws, and whether it's a straw or a decently-thought-out criticism, i really feel like there's no excuse for clinging to them as much as tony does.
Yes.Probably what tony's next alt will be named.
Rule against it or not, it's still extremely annoying, especially since you can edit posts
And i honestly think it is spam, since most of those double, triple, and quadruple posts are stating the same thing in slightly different ways.
Blatant trolling, extremely stupid posts, stuffposts, and constant double, triple, and even quadruple posts, to name a few things that he has done wrong.Have you read any of the last 42 pages?
After a while this stopped being about the fallout 4 thread and started being about other stupid things tony did and said, mostly in this very thread.
Also, i get that the users in this thread aren't a hive mind or anything, and i know that i've said this before, but i really feel like there's a double standard here when it comes to baiting.
Whenever tony baits someone into saying something, people say it's their fault for taking the bait.
Whenever someone supposedly "baits" tony into saying something, people say that it's their fault for setting the bait, even if they didn't even intentionally do so.
I get that people are probably going to quote this and say something among the lines of "see you're just trying to get him banned!!!", but is excessive trolling bannable?
I know that admittance to trolling is bannable and i don't see why it would be completely fine as long as you didn't admit it.
Even if that's the case, which i really think it isn't, one stuffpost is better than a thousand small stuffposts.
Nobody's saying that it's not relevant to fallout 4, but that's not an excuse.
He's not politely stating his opinion: his posts in the fallout 4 thread appear to be trolling and intentionally inflammatory stuffposts, and he constantly grinds on, repeating himself unprompted when he doesn't get enough attention, and even doubleposting basically the same thing worded in different ways. In a board where you can edit posts.
He rails on and on about the same thing, attempting to get as much mileage as he can over petty "complaints" like 'This game doesn't have rape, it's so unrealistic', and it won't be long until his posts about essential NPCs reach the triple digits.
This is why i usually mark my sarcasm in italic text.
Almost every time i don't someone thinks i legitimately believe that i think i got autism from milk and vaccines.
I am not intentionally trying to bait tony into doing something that'd get them banned.
I honestly think tony's actions in the fallout 4 thread are more than annoying.
It's very disruptive to the thread and hard to ignore, due to how many times he posts, and how people still react to him.
Fair enough, but i'm not going to believe that you got a refund, since i really don't trust you.
Sorry for having a mental condition i have no control over, i shouldn't have taken so much milk and vaccines.
And most people don't have them on steam.
Most people would wait for over 24 hours before contacting him, and most people would do it on the blf.
I don't see how that's worth stating.
Many other people have read the post i previously made stating that i have autism.
Unless you're saying that you guessed i have autism because i disagree with you, in which case that's stupid and i highly doubt that.That's not a new argument, several people have said that before.
And they're probably right.
Called it.And before you say i'm no better than tony for saying that:
- It's not a vital rule to anything
- I tried to make it readably large
Within exactly 24 hours.
Specifically on steam.
If you say so.
It's sarcasm you olympic dinguses
No, your own logic. You're the one who first unironically and unsarcastically "i don't see you making a raffle."
Still waiting for you to prove that you got a refund.
I may have mild autism but i'm not stupid enough to actually believe that.
inbefore "that explains a lot"
SPLIT INTO ANOTHER POST DUE TO SIZE LIMIT
