Author Topic: WSJ VS. YOUTUBE MEGATHREAD | 4/30/2017 | AppNexus and the WSJ connection  (Read 10726 times)

So WSJ is still credible and reliable after this stuff? Have you all lost it?

This is fake news.
stop.
Wtf, okay, so all of ya are gonna still trust the WSJ after this national socialist-like practice? Have you all gone loving crazy or are you mob thinking against tony because 'b-but tony".

Im sorry, WSJ is no longer a credible or respectable source, or establishment.

The WSJ needs to loving shut down or fade into obscurity.
Or maybe youre all in favour of companies censoring opposing points of view.

the only ads i've been seeing on videos now are vimeo lol actually had a cool ad and I checked out vimeo and watched some videos over there

Wtf, okay, so all of ya are gonna still trust the WSJ after this national socialist-like practice? Have you all gone loving crazy or are you mob thinking against tony because 'b-but tony".

Im sorry, WSJ is no longer a credible or respectable source, or establishment.

The WSJ needs to loving shut down or fade into obscurity.
Or maybe youre all in favour of companies censoring opposing points of view.
I never said I trusted the WSJ. I told Tony to stop talking to himself because clearly he was just spamming the same thing after Ip explained his point.

He just ignored the entire paragraph and just kept posting "fake news" at this point you can't have a civil conversation with him without him ignoring everything you say entirely.

national socialist-like practice



Im sorry, WSJ is no longer a credible or respectable source, or establishment.

The WSJ needs to loving shut down or fade into obscurity.
Or maybe youre all in favour of companies censoring opposing points of view.
I just want to point out the irony here for posterity's sake.

I just want to point out the irony here for posterity's sake.

It needs to, but no one person is gonna do it.
The people will decide.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2017, 11:39:51 AM by Master Matthew² »

Matthew trusts 4chan more than actual news sites, so his opinion on the matter is hypocritical and handicapped.

Matthew trusts 4chan more than actual news sites, so his opinion on the matter is hypocritical and handicapped.

PhantOS trusts Fallacies more than evidence, so his posts are all stuffposts.

The people will decide.
This is particularly why WSJ is still in business.  People trust it as a generally credible news source.  That makes you the obscure outlier.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2017, 11:59:38 AM by SWAT One »

This is particularly why WSJ is still in business.  People trust it as a generally credible news source.  That make you the obscure outlier.
Its on the decline, and actions like these only quicken it.

WSJ is fake news and if you say otherwise you're blind by reality.

WSJ is fake news and if you say otherwise you're blind by reality.
what the forget does blind by reality mean?
did you mean blinded by reality? because even if so, it still doesn't make any sense.

what the forget does blind by reality mean?
did you mean blinded by reality? because even if so, it still doesn't make any sense.

i guess he's meaning to tell us we are being realistic if we think wsj is real

what the forget does blind by reality mean?
did you mean blinded by reality? because even if so, it still doesn't make any sense.
He's too blinded by his fantasies to say things that make sense

PhantOS trusts Fallacies more than evidence, so his posts are all stuffposts.
Prove it. Use evidence too.

WSJ is fake news and if you say otherwise you're blind by reality.
"open your eyes sheeple!'