your over reaction clearly shows that you only care about the freedom of pushing (violent) political views on YouTube and that you don't actually care about the RDR2 gameplay.
im going to mention again that channels dont get shut down at first offense, so this guy clearly knew he wasn't allowed to do what he was doing but kept doing it anyway.
no actually the TOS has rules against it:
"if the primary purpose of the content is to incite hatred against a group of people" / "Beating Up Annoying Feminist"
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2801939?, plenty of other videos get removed because of this.
by the way... "national attention"...?
hey handicap, it's a video game. he's obv not calling for violence against actual women here.
if you're going to define "hate speech" as harming female characters in a video game, then why aren't you calling for the game itself (as well as fallout, skyrim, and many others like it) to be banned entirely from youtube? since, you know, these games are designed to let you do these things in graphic detail (eg. in skyrim you can not only punch women but behead them and strip their bodies). i'm sure there's tons of such other videos on big gamer channels of players shouting lydia off a cliff in skyrim or going on mass shooting sprees involving women npcs in fallout, and those youtubers are not banned.
"Beating Up Annoying Feminist" is hatespeech by youtube's standards
your over reaction clearly shows that you only care about the freedom of pushing (violent) political views on YouTube and that you don't actually care about the RDR2 gameplay.
if you think that speech you personally dislike (or gameplay footage you personally dislike for that matter) is "hate speech" and should then be banned on such grounds, then you are a fascist.
stop trying to pull this "it was hate speech, therefore he deserved to be banned" crap. it's not hate speech in the first place. it's just a dude playing a video game.
