In my opinion it is better to be too shallow then to be too descriptive at first. That way the reader can implement his own imagination in it instead of it being completely thought out.
Its been my Achilles heel, I'm naturally an overconcious and overthought person and that reflects over to my writing which tends to blossom into an elaborate enigma which most people would not get any sustanence of a story from.
On top of that, I'm a perfectionist. Whatever isn't right won't be right till its fixed, and I have to hit the bullseye almost immediately or I'm unsatisfied.
But yeah, I see where you're going with being too shallow at first and then later beckoning over the deeper details. Its probably the surrealism of
The Book Thief by Mark Zusack getting to me, it seems to be a good head off; but I must be aiming a bit high.