rally did not "shut me down", i've simply said all i have to say on the subject. no point in arguing with a lot of the people in this thread anymore since it's like arguing with a brick wall. The content of rally's post embodies the exact things i was pointing out this thread's full of: paranoid witch-hunting, blanket-labeling, completely unfair comparisons, and snide personal attacks.
Okay and everything you've said in this thread is handicapped, dumb, and incorrect. Pwnd.
???
a lot of the people here are using the term "child enthusiast" in a widespread, very blunt manner and by merit insinuating that there is no difference between people who simply like loli and people who actually prowl neighborhoods looking to kidnap real, living, breathing human children. they're lumping these two different kinds of people into the same basket and declaring them both evil.
I'm not declaring child enthusiasts as "evil". I don't think anyone in this thread is, although I would entirely understand it if they did. I think that's just some ambiguous bullstuff you came up with to make your position easier to defend. We are declaring them to be sick. There is nothing wrong with being sick so long as you are making the conscious geniune effort to not be sick. Everybody knows this. Coming onto the internet and defending child enthusiasm as a totally harmless misunderstood "God-given" pastime is not only inherently immoral and disgusting, but also represents mental illness on a level that's probably
worse than child enthusiasm itself because you're
actively pushing child enthusiasts deeper into their illness through justification rather than towards a healthier lifestyle. Dig? The only thing you are accomplishing with this stuff is pushing fringe child enthusiasts further towards real, victimizing love crime.
You are the problem. At this point I'm almost entirely convinced that you consume cartoon child research yourself and this is more of a personal justification than an objective one. The biggest problem isn't some creepy greasy teenager in his basement getting off to cartoon child research, the problem lies with the creepy greasy teenager coming onto the Blockland forums and throwing out a bunch of amateur lawyer/armchair psychologist garbage trying to defend it, constantly eroding the barriers between
"harmless child enthusiasm" and child molestation.
It's against the law in almost every civilized first world country except America. Cartoon child research should be against the law, not because it directly harms children (only indirectly), but because it would force sick people to either get help, or out themselves as creeps protesting it, effectively removing people like you from the gene pool. forget your ''''right'''' to jack off to imaginary children.