T̶u̶m̶b̶l̶r̶ wofl Megathread

[Kimon²]

are you actually trying to say it's bad to use something because it looks nice?

for computers? (overpriced ones at that)
yes

[Ad Bot]

[Yosher]

are you actually trying to say it's bad to use something because it looks nice?

if it's the only reason they use it, then it is bad

[Cool Boi]

Why do panloveuals have to exist

[Kimon²]

that's not cute or funny it's embarrassing

[TheABELBOTO]

we should test that theory

[Cool Boi]

I just found out aloveualfacts was a thing
also how the forget is not giving a stuff about what you find in your partner's pants a loveuality.
That's called being bi with low standards.

"We're better than you"

[Kimon²]

I just found out aloveualfacts was a thing
also how the forget is not giving a stuff about what you find in your partner's pants a loveuality.
That's called being bi with low standards.

you underestimate tumblr's great need to be special

[TheABELBOTO]

I just found out aloveualfacts was a thing
also how the forget is not giving a stuff about what you find in your partner's pants a loveuality.
That's called being bi with low standards.

"We're better than you"

hetreo's have passive 90% common sense boost B)

also anyone who claims to be actually aloveual are usually lying.

[blueblur121]

I'm glad that they are against reproduction.

[childofdarkness016]

also anyone who claims to be actually aloveual are usually lying.

????

oh wait yes i am lying about my loveuality because there is NOTHING more intriguing than not wanting to have love

i became 20% more interesting and garnered more attention by doing so

[blueblur121]

Not having love does not make you a different loveuality.

[Foxscotch]

for computers? (overpriced ones at that)
yes

it's their money, why do you care what they spend it on?

if it's the only reason they use it, then it is bad

how?

also how the forget is not giving a stuff about what you find in your partner's pants a loveuality.
That's called being bi with low standards.

does that genuinely make sense to you? you actually believe what you just said?

I'm glad that they are against reproduction.

wth?????
how are you getting so upset about the fact that some people aren't loveually attracted to other people?

Not having love does not make you a different loveuality.

yeah, because then you would be aloveual. not being loveually attracted to people, however, is a loveuality

[Kimon²]

i think aloveuals exist, but grey-ace and other "i kind of like love but only sometimes" is just a low libido and shouldnt be classified as a loveuality

[PowerDag]

????

oh wait yes i am lying about my loveuality because there is NOTHING more intriguing than not wanting to have love

i became 20% more interesting and garnered more attention by doing so

most people who claim to be aloveual just have a very low libido or are just being special snowflakey for attention. people who are actually aloveual are not that easy to come by -- given that the human biology is designed with loveual reproduction in mind. if you are actually aloveual that's wonderful, but there is no need to tell absolutely everyone as one's loveuality is not a defining trait of their personality.

[Maxwell.]

another loving sjw type subject in the tumblr megathread destined to turn into an argument
take it to tumblr for forget sake just because a thread about tumblr exists doesn't mean you bring the negative stuff to it