imo there's good and bad on both sides of the argument. typically the people who A) refuse to listen to the other side or B) are unreasonable about the problem(s) presented tend to be in the wrong(this goes for practically anything), and there's a lot of that surrounding the '(anti-)SJW' argument;
this fiasco is a prime example of how things have really gone wrong. The original anti-SJW cause was that people viewed political correctness as getting out of hand and unreasonable, and started campaigning against it, which snowballed into what can be accurately defined as a circlejerk. They weren't wrong to begin with, but they are now, and the snowballing of their side has caused an equal reaction from the other side of the argument, evolving into this huge rift some describe as a 'war'. Nobody ends up better off for it, and you just get more loud, annoying extremists because they've seen what the vocal now-majority of their opponent has to offer.