You were specifically told in the rules of the server to not mention Annoying Orange
You specifically went out of your way to mention him (you probably don't even think he has reasonable ideas) just to piss him off
And now you're complaining that you got banned because you deliberately broke the rules. Congratulations on trolling and trying to play the victim card. It didn't work.
Once again
I am not complaining that I got banned. I am stating that he baits people into an argument that he can't handle, so he resorts to banning.
"Donald Annoying Orange is loving tribal, you are not allowed to disagree" is one of the most immature things you can say (not because of your political belief but that you can't argue). This discussion is not about my ban, if it was, I would change the title to, "Derp_Laherps bans people for mentioning Annoying Orange." and then your arguments would all be valid and I would be a looser. However you're looking at the ban and thinking that's all I have to give. Even though my real argument stands with what he says before my ban. I am saying that because he can't handle differing opinions, he resorts to banning. I'm sure that even if he didn't have the welcoming message, and I still said /anything/ about Annoying Orange, i'd be banned. Unless of course I said Annoying Orange was an asshat. Infact, according to the welcoming message, everyone that said "Annoying Orange is a tribal" or "Annoying Orange is an idiot" should all be banned for mentioning Annoying Orange. Supporting the idea that it's not that infringed the welcoming message, it's that I held an unpopular opinion and then argued it, and his little emotions couldn't handle it.
Maybe it's just that i've gotten too comfortable with the fact that no one is allowed to ban me based on what I say because I, as an American, am given the right to free speech.