POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD

[Frequency]

To add to this: is there anyone here who opposes background checks on gun ownership? I'd be interested to hear why.

You'd have to have some screws loose if you opposed background checks.

[Ad Bot]

[TristanLuigi]

Funny how "certain" people are getting hypermad about Annoying Orange even remotely suggesting the smallest breach of the first amendment but they all want to burn the second amendment

Okay, not only are you completely dodging the argument, but you're conveniently overlooking the fact that the first amendment is obviously much more important than the second. Your right to own an explosion tube is drastically less impactful than your right to speak out against the government or anyone else, as democracies literally cannot function without that right (while most major democracies are just fine without guns).

The first amendment (along with a few other laws) also ensures that the government cannot discriminate based on religion and we all know Annoying Orange's opinions on that.

If there's any amendments you should worry about, it's the first and fourth (see: the NSA).

[beachbum111111]

Demonic

[Cappytaino]

tim kaine looks like the ice cream man that's a little too friendly with the neighborhood kids

[Frequency]

prepare to accept our new overlords

[Tactical Nuke]

Okay, not only are you completely dodging the argument, but you're conveniently overlooking the fact that the first amendment is obviously much more important than the second. Your right to own an explosion tube is drastically less impactful than your right to speak out against the government or anyone else, as democracies literally cannot function without that right (while most major democracies are just fine without guns).

Except there are hate speech laws in Canada, Germany, the UK and other democracies and they're all still standing (at the moment) so your argument is invalid

oh and also what do you do when the government becomes oppressive and takes you away for criticizing them

...

oh right you use your "explosion tube" that you're given the RIGHT to have to defend yourself

just watch some Crowder videos on this please
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZrcR3guGG0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MW_noXjj6w8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CquUBWHU2_s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEihkjKNhN8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IULSD8VwXEs

The first amendment (along with a few other laws) also ensures that the government cannot discriminate based on religion and we all know Annoying Orange's opinions on that.

WOW Annoying Orange IS SUCH AN ISLAMOPHOBE THERE'S NO JUSTIFICATION FOR THAT oh wait there is





also add any terrorist attack in the last 20 years to that list

[Satan From Wreck-It-Ralph]

also add any terrorist attack in the last 20 years to that list

i'd point out that there have been plenty of non-islamic terror attacks but you'd probably ignore them because it goes against your argument

[Cappytaino]

i'd point out that there have been plenty of non-islamic terror attacks but you'd probably ignore them because it goes against your argument

cite them pls

I want to know specifically what number "plenty" is

[MoltenKitten]

i'd point out that there have been plenty of non-islamic terror attacks but you'd probably ignore them because it goes against your argument

There is a disproportionally large amount of terrorist attacks caused by islam

islam is an ideology like national socialistsm that is masqueraded as a religion

[beachbum111111]

i'd point out that there have been plenty of non-islamic terror attacks but you'd probably ignore them because it goes against your argument

"plenty"
Like how many of the overall terrorist attacks within the last 20 years have been non islamic? 20%? 50%? 70%?

[Jairo]

There is a disproportionally large amount of terrorist attacks caused by islam

islam is an ideology like national socialistsm that is masqueraded as a religion

national socialistsm was not masqueraded as a religion

you're also misinterpreting the delicate balance between islam and islamism

[Satan From Wreck-It-Ralph]

I don't need a source. Google it for yourself.

[Cappytaino]

I'd also like to add that Muslims make up .9% of the US population.
Native Americans make up 2%

One is a group legitimately persecuted by the government and people of the United States for centuries. The other are followers of a backwards third-world ideology.

One commits disproportionate amounts of terrorism. The other DID at points clash with the US military, but has not committed anywhere near the number of atrocities as the other.

Honestly, it's not very difficult to see why people are wary of Muslims. They commit a disproportionate amount of violent acts of terror. Islam is an ideology and that is why it scares people. Anyone can be radicalized.

I don't need a source. Google it for yourself.

So you're talking out your ass, then?

I googled something for you, however.

[Satan From Wreck-It-Ralph]

So you're talking out your ass, then?

How can anyone be so lazy that they can't Google "non-islamic terror attacks"?

[Cappytaino]

How can anyone be so lazy that they can't Google "non-islamic terror attacks"?

You clearly didn't want to when you told me to google it myself after I asked for a source.