Disease

[Subpixel]

Hosting the server again w/ new admins and blood.

[Ad Bot]

[awesomebread]

who made the map

[Wink]

I'd like to list out the pros and cons of accepting builds that don't use all default bricks because I recently learned, to my surprise, that ZapK doesn't accept builds with non-default bricks. This is the build I wanted to submit: http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=253962.0


   Pros for accepting non-default brick builds

• More original builds
• Less Afghan - so tired of this
• More interest in the server / more players / more fun

   Cons for accepting non-default brick builds

• More files to download (this is a one time thing though)

*If you think of anything else to add to the list, let me know.

[Crøwn]

Loving the paper bag hat I bought!

[quadilious]

-snip-

yea, i tried to show him a build i thought he could use, but apparently it has to be default. pretty silly if you ask me, as almost nobody builds default anymore and you're only limiting yourself by not using brickpacks anyways.

[Snaked_Snake]

yea, i tried to show him a build i thought he could use, but apparently it has to be default. pretty silly if you ask me, as almost nobody builds default anymore and you're only limiting yourself by not using brickpacks anyways.

I don't think that was worthy of a snip but...

I agree.

[Kniaz]

yea, i tried to show him a build i thought he could use, but apparently it has to be default. pretty silly if you ask me, as almost nobody builds default anymore and you're only limiting yourself by not using brickpacks anyways.

I build with just default...
I'm pretty comfortable with it, too.

[AdinX]

I build with just default...
I'm pretty comfortable with it, too.

pretty silly if you ask me, as almost nobody builds default anymore

I'm neutral on the matter. If the host wants default only, that's his choice, you don't have to like it cause it's not your server.

[carolcat]

this sounds like something fun to try

[murder burger]

the infected can easily infect others just by a click and the survivors haft to hit them about 3 times with a melee wepon (survivor always get a random melee from T+T)

this seems hard for the survivors. I would just say maybe 2 clicks or just make a melee for infected which only dose 50 damage to survivors.

i under stand that the infected don't have unlimited lives and that's maybe why its only on click. it is just too easy for the infected...

another thing.

the bridge in the middle at the top isn't a bridge its more like using a popsicle stick for a bridge at least make a few more seconds before the bridge brakes.

one more thing you could add is that you can have a gun spot that could change positions every round ( when i mean gun i mean the Pistol in T+T)

And I think that's pretty much it for improvements in the game

these are just my suggestions to improve the game. it might be a good idea and it might be a bad idea.



 

[Subpixel]

The infected can easily infect others just by a click, and the survivors hafthave to hit them about 3 times with a melee weponweapon (survivors always get a random melee weapons from T+T). This seems hard for the survivors. I would just say maybe 2 clicks, or just make a melee weapon for infected which only dosedoes 50 damage to survivors. I under standunderstand that the infected don't have unlimited lives, and that's maybemaybe that's why itsit's only on click. It is just too easy for the infected...

Another thing:

The bridge in the middle at the topmiddle-top isn't a bridge, itsit's more like using a popsicle stick for a bridge. At least makeadd a few more seconds before the bridge brakesbreaks. One more thing you could add is thata feature in-which you can have a gun spot that could changes positions every round (when I mean gun, I mean the Pistolpistol in T+T). And I think that's pretty much it for improvements in the game.

These are just my suggestions to improve the game. It might be a good idea, and it might be a bad idea.

Infected can't use guns. They're infected.

Is this reply just because you got infected and fell off the bridge?

[Orion]

Infected people should act more like a disease.

Just like how the patient zero starts out much stronger, over time, anybody infected and still alive should procedurally gain strength.

[murder burger]

Infected can't use guns. They're infected.

Is this reply just because you got infected and fell off the bridge?

i didn't say that infected can use guns... T_T i meant for the survivor to find and use guns

and plz the bridge is weak and right when you get on it   it breaks...   its like there isn't a bridge and you have to jump across which you cant...

and i like it how you go and correct my comment like i turned in an essay...
i am starting to think you act like i am some 5 year old kid complaining O_o

i am not here to rage or some stuff like that

but this is what i was thinking when playing the game

its vary fun!
i just feel like the infected can infected others so easy and the survivors have to hit them about 3 times

and the gun aspect was to deafened at a longer range but were every one can have a gun

Welp :/

hope that helps you under stand what i mean

[Subpixel]

So this is happening again.

[Jakobblockhead]

wait aren't you one of those guys who flame the people who bump their semi-old topics?