Just because there are socialist aspects in the government that doesn't mean we live in a socialist nation.
It's not socialism. It's democratic socialism. That's literally what I said. The two are completely different things.
It isn't stupid at all. We don't need a bum/slob that has always lived on government money and has never accomplished anything despite having ability to to be president.
You're calling a contributing member of society and a senator a slob and a bum. Not only is that extremely disrespectful and rude and objectively wrong but it has
absolutely nothing to do with being president. He has the skills required to be a president, he has the ideas, he has the plans, he has the experience as a politician, he has everything needed. There's literally no reason he can't be successful as president. And if you're going to go on the logic that nobody who lives off government money should be president then you better go talk to John F. Kennedy, Barack Obama, John Tyler, James Monroe, Harry S. Truman, Andrew Jackson, John Quincy Adams, and many others who were all US senators before becoming president.