Tony—disagree with the journalists, dislike the journalists, hate the journalists, loath the journalists—I don't care. I think the media, especially mainstream, is full of dishonest, disingenuous and politically biassed "journalists" and editors—I'm with you on this. I even believe that the for-profit media corporation in this age will prefer the deaths of innocent people because it turns a profit, and their sponsors and advertisers have their back.
BUT, and I swivel from this previous point—Society is only as good as the people within it make it. Anyone has the ability to be good and call evil by what it is. A sick person is on a rampage, sure. I say that saying "they deserved it" is too far, but let's but this in perspective:
journalist's families and friends getting what they deserve
Who remains alive to carry that burden and that loss? Sure, it's terrible that people died. After one dies, their body only carries sentimental value, and even then it perishes pretty quickly.
You could at least humor me instead of continuing the lie that us humans are significant to the world. It's not true.
Maybe humans are significant to the world. Maybe they're not. But since when has the violent crime issue been tied to the environment and state of the Earth? No, this is about humans being important to other humans. I'm not seeing how your patently sociopathic argument holds any credibility.
