- It doesn't matter if the journalist doesn't outright name the AR-15, they still make reference to it and they quote from experts. It's not an op-ed.
If a journalist doesn't know what they are talking about with a subject then they shouldn't be advocating legislative action on that subject you tard.
- Cars are made for driving. Guns are made for killing.
And you have just confirmed that you have never fired a gun in your life. You know nothing about them and have no clue what you are talking about. You are a walking vagina.
There's a difference in purpose for both. And no, it's not as easy to drive a car through a brick wall into a school like a cartoon than to bring an assault weapon.
Guns are made for many purposes. Hunting, target practice,
Russian Roulette, what about first person shooters? They are just made for killing digital people, we should ban them, they are poisoning our youth after all.
AND chlorine bombs are illegal.
L
M
F
A
O
You realize you can make a chlorine bomb right? Are you handicapped?
- Yes, you could enforce an assault weapons ban nationwide. Saying "criminals will find a way" is an argument against any law in existence. There's significantly less Aussies than Americans but they've had an assault weapons ban for more than 20 years and gun death has nearly been eliminated. You really think the bogans know more about this issue than we do?
Yes compare a country with the 10th of the population with far less racial tension between it's ethnic groups. 'criminals will find a way' is definitely the loving case considering that a large of amount of mass shootings are already with illegal firearms AND you are dealing with a country that has more guns then people.