Doesn't the, "I CAN'T SEE IT SO UR WRONG" argument fall better into your statement then mine?
No, you are proposing bogus theories.
Science Magazine published an article about Co2 lagging behind temperature rise, meaning it can not be leading the temperature increase. The Co2 rule about it not starting warming is not a brand new fact, just the kind of thing you'd know if you knew what Co2 was. Go research about it for once.
According to
www.eoearth.org causes of natural climate change are the result of "Variations in the Earth's orbital characteristics, Atmospheric carbon dioxide variations, Volcanic eruptions, Variations in solar output." which is proof that the Earths heat does change naturally, so you are obviously wrong about that. Carbon dioxide levels 'amplify' the warmth as I was saying before, they don't start warming. So all this gibberish about "C02 FROM YOU CAUSES GLOBAL WARMING SO STOP" is crap, because it doesn't cause it.
There is a documentary somewhere about global warming being a lie, where respected scientists share their views on the matter. Now, I'm not sure of the title of this, but its out there and worth a watch. You are being unrealistic if you expect me to remember the title and soruce of every single show I've watched related to or mentioning global warming in the last two years.
I do believe global warming is just for profit and political reasons. In fact, a doco called "The Great Global Warming Swindle" supports this, stating (to quote Wikipedias definition of the movie) "that the scientific opinion on climate change is influenced by funding and political factors, and questions whether scientific consensus on anthropogenic global warming exists."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle#Evidential_issuesBefore you say "well scientists were misrepresented there" while some may feel their statements were twisted, the information there is fact.
If you want more resources related to my information do some research. Scared of being proven wrong, or just lazy? A debate is a two way street, if you are gonna stand your ground and say that your exaggerated theories are true then why don't you present some actual information.
Poll