1981
Off Topic / Re: Republican National Convention -Day 2- Cleveland, OH - Annoying Orange 1267 - OTHER 476
« on: July 19, 2016, 07:14:49 PM »the jazz music has started playing
but it is not over yet
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
the jazz music has started playing
but it is not over yet
1982
Off Topic / Re: Republican National Convention -Day 2- Cleveland, OH - Annoying Orange 1000+ - OTHER 300+
« on: July 19, 2016, 07:02:18 PM »
michigan & new york have passed
rest in peace
rest in peace
1984
Off Topic / Re: Republican National Convention - Day 2 - Cleveland, OH - Annoying Orange 550+ - OTHERS 102
« on: July 19, 2016, 06:34:40 PM »
idaho's famous potatoes
1985
Off Topic / Republican National Convention -Day 2- Carson goes Rogue, mentions Lucifer
« on: July 19, 2016, 06:21:14 PM »
for anyone who's interested, the 2016 Republican National Convention is being held in Cleveland, Ohio. convention called to order as of 5:30 PM eastern standard time. prime time speeches will begin at 8 PM eastern standard time.
current headliners;
Donald Annoying Orange, Jr., U.S. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (WV), Ben Carson and Kimberlin Brown.
http://convention.gop/tuesday-speakers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_lpyG-ddec
current roll call of states (1237 needed to nominate)
Annoying Orange - 1500
Others - 641
carson just went rogue and off the rails
he first said he will not be 'politically correct' at the start of his speech, and then started going on about things that weren't at all on his prompter, then he proceeded to go at hillary (not sure about this part, wasn't there for it, had to leave to get something out of the room) and mentioned lucifer a few times, and made multiple remarks that weren't on his prompter either, i wasn't around for all of it. the people at RNC cut his speech off short, but apparently it was supposed to be much, much longer
https://twitter.com/HotlineJosh/status/755592436957577216
https://twitter.com/HotlineJosh/status/755592645087367170
https://twitter.com/HotlineJosh/status/755593026223820800
godspeed high energy carson
1986
Off Topic / Re: Annoying Oranges wife copies Michele Obamas speech
« on: July 19, 2016, 05:51:30 PM »are you stupid or something
1988
Off Topic / Re: have love with Hillary Clinton or Donald Annoying Orange...
« on: July 19, 2016, 05:02:14 PM »
1989
Off Topic / Re: Bernie supports hillary clinton
« on: July 19, 2016, 02:50:04 AM »I don't feel like there's really any excuse to use a personal email server as your primary means of correspondence when serving as Secretary of State. I just think it reflects a level of professional incompetence more than a criminal offense.i can see where you're coming from, and while i can also see why it shouldn't be considered a criminal offense, but the level of incompetence oin the handling of classified information is still pretty off-putting to me, and again, there can also be reasons why the FBI aren't indicting her right away
and also in a response to your post i missed;
They recovered all of the emails though. Outside of loony conspiracy theories, there's no reason why the FBI wouldn't indict her if they found that she was throwing out classified or top-secret information.i'm hoping this doesn't sound too loony to you guys, but this is a post online that i found that pretty nicely summed up what i thought in better words than my own;
Quote
The way I understand it is the FBI is wary to recommend the DoJ to prosecute because it's simply that sensitive of a matter. The full extent of the Clinton Foundation/e-mail server being compromised would come to light and implicate too many powerful people. They don't want to indict the presumptive Democratic nominee of treason (that is for leaking secret access programs and compromising field agents).
go on wikileaks. most of that stuff is so inconsequential its not even interesting.these are 50,547 pages of documents, i'm not sure if you looked through all them and just got 'meaningless garbage', and there's also still the unrevealed e-mails/documents that are kept from public viewing/hearing for a reason
1990
Off Topic / Re: Bernie supports hillary clinton
« on: July 19, 2016, 02:16:50 AM »So, what are you concluding based on that transcript? It doesn't surprise me too much that an intelligence official would be extremely hush-hush when making recorded statements about the evidence in an on-going case. Anything he says is essentially on-the-book, so the nervousness and hesitated speech makes sense.me neither, i'm just saying that i believe it's more than what zealot is really making it down to be, i'm not going to go full-conspiracy nut so i don't want to make drastic accusations, but it seems like he's downplaying the e-mails to just
"Jeff, I'm really gonna miss serving with you! Thanks so much for your help, and I'll always remember you as one of my best secretaries!"
1991
Off Topic / Re: Bernie supports hillary clinton
« on: July 19, 2016, 02:09:02 AM »^ hilarious and substantive response to well-reasoned and developed points.well-reasoned and developed points alright then
Also anyone who thinks the Secretary of State should be imprisoned for mishandling documents is insane. It was dumb but honestly I don't think it has been nearly as bad as people have blown it up to be. GOP politicians do shadier and more malicious things every single day.i don't know what you think they were, but i think you're underestimating the importance of how big it is. i believe this is a small part of the 4-hour long event in which FBI director james comey testified before congress
http://webmshare.com/VzmxZ (2 minutes & 51 seconds long)
incase you (and i know other people do this) don't want to watch a whole 2 minutes and 51 seconds, i'll go ahead and create some logs for you. mccullough is an intelligence community inspector general, and is with the ODNI.
Quote
Chaffetz: Mr. McCullough?
McCullough: Certainly, I can provide you what, uh.. I think we have provided Congress with everything that we had, uh, we can certainly-.. It's over in Senate Security, we provided it to SSCI I believe, and we have also-..
Chaffetz: Can you provide this committee, in a secure format, um.. The classified e-mails?
McCullough: I can to a certain extent, I cannot provide a certain.. Segment of them, because the agency that owns the information for those e-mails has limited the distribution on those, so they're characterizing them as 'ORCON'.
Chaffetz: What- Explain what ORCON is.
McCullough: Originator Control, so I can't, uh, I can't give them to even Congress without getting the agency's permission to provide them.
Chaffetz: Which agency?
McCullough: I can't say that in an open hearing, sir.
Chaffetz: So you can't even tell me which agency won't allow us, as members of Congress, to see something that Hillary Clinton allowed someone without a security clearance, in a non-protected format, to see, that's correct?
-
Chaffetz: Can you generally tell me-.. Uh, is it, because they're so sensitive about.. Signal's(?) intelligence, human's intelligence, what..?
McCullough: We shouldn't get into the.. The content of these e-mails in an open hearing, I'd..
Chaffetz: Okay, alright, alright-.. I don't wanna violate that, but the concern is it has already been violated, and it has been violated by Hillary Clinton. And it was her choice, she set it up, and she created this problem, and she-.. Created this mess, we shouldn't have to go through this, but she did that.
McCullough: This' the-.. This' the segment of e-mails that, uh, I had to have people in my office read in to particular programs to even see these e-mails, we didn't- we didn't possess the required clearances-..
Chaffetz: So even the Inspector General for ODNI didn't even have the requisite security clearances?
McCullough: Right, that's correct. I had to get read-ins for them.
Chaffetz: [over McCullough] Wow, wow, wow-..
Chaffetz: Unbelievable, what a mess, um-.. I'll yield back.
to further bolster this, FBI director james comey has acknowledged hillary clinton gave non-cleared people access to classified information
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJ0YEchTwEc
also as an extra, hillary clinton blamed white americans for the dallas shootings
https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/751542474972291072
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qaeVwWr2eU
you can go and search her emails online. it's literally meaningless garbage like "Jeff, I'm really gonna miss serving with you! Thanks so much for your help, and I'll always remember you as one of my best secretaries!"are you serious?
1992
Off Topic / Re: Bernie supports hillary clinton
« on: July 19, 2016, 01:29:59 AM »Anyone who feels betrayed by Bernie endorsing Hillary is delusional and letting pettiness cloud their judgement. They agree on 99% of issues. They agree with Annoying Orange on very few. I know 99% isn't what you want, but securing a victory against the crazy orange border-wall man is more important. If he had refused to endorse Hillary it would be nothing more than a petty grudge, and I would be dissapointed in him. He chose the next best option for America.
Also, I think she's more liberal than she lets on. Nobody goes from a fullblown bra-burning hippie to Hillary Clinton without a little bit of self-manipulation.
Just look at young Hillary. There's no way.
Also anyone who thinks the Secretary of State should be imprisoned for mishandling documents is insane. It was dumb but honestly I don't think it has been nearly as bad as people have blown it up to be. GOP politicians do shadier and more malicious things every single day.
1993
Off Topic / Re: night discussion topic I guess [night 60]
« on: July 18, 2016, 10:37:50 PM »
i sure do love the nights and the mornings but everytime i wake up no matter what time it is or what i do to prevent it its hot as forget in my room and i feel terrible
1994
Off Topic / Re: XR is a marked man - da cops are looking for me
« on: July 18, 2016, 10:24:32 PM »where can i get one of theseiirc they often sell them off at police auctions (if these even happen anymore, i haven't seen/heard of one recently, but then again i dont live in the city where it usually happens) when they're getting newer, less outdated vehicles, and the crown vic is starting to slowly be replaced by the charger
but you can also find ads for people selling off their own decommissioned police vehicles on your own on places like craigslist or some vehicle auctioning sites
their conditions vary depending on why they're being auctioned off in the first place though
1995
Off Topic / Re: Why are people still talking about that gorilla named Harambe?
« on: July 18, 2016, 09:59:45 PM »