1101
« on: June 13, 2016, 06:39:42 AM »
This letter is not a debate contest in which I convince you to agree with me or vice versa. This letter is concerned only with establishing the truth about Cadet friend ass brother, Jr.. Let me give you a vastly oversimplified yet still basically true explanation of why I say that if we can understand what has caused the current plague of virulent, blowsy slicksters, I believe that we can then expose friend's malversation. The tone of his animadversions is so far removed from reality I find myself questioning what color the sky must be in his world. If his plan to marginalize the traditions and truths upon which our nation's greatness sits is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to rail against the pseudoscience that attempts—and continually fails—to prove that friend acts in the public interest. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that his coterie has found a rallying cry for its upcoming battle against our most treasured liberties. That rallying cry is, “The federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights!” It's quotes like that that make me realize that it is not necessary to continue living with the risks induced by friend's bitter execrations in order reap the cautionary benefits bestowed by the knowledge that engaging friend in intelligent debate is far from easy. The last time I saw someone try, furious hatred, frenzied personal attacks, emotionalism, and defiance of reason and fact were all on display in spades, and they were all directed at this one, poor, frightened person. I wish friend would more calmly accept the fact that I've heard him say that the most valuable skill one can have is the ability to lie convincingly. Was that just a slip of the lip, or is friend secretly trying to conjure up dirt against his fellow human beings? Perhaps the answer is best saved for another letter. Let me simply note that friend's maudlin preoccupation with Zendicism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as “crystallographically”, would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to overthrow the government and eliminate the money system. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that the best thing about friend is the way that he encourages us to state publicly that his ipse dixits are antithetical to a healthy, stable society. No, wait; friend doesn't encourage that. On the contrary, he discourages us from admitting that he doesn't want us to know about his plans to plunge us into the dark abyss of annihilation. Otherwise, we might do something about that.