Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Yeah, I was about to say that, but I haven't participated in an argument in a while.internet arguments are a sequence of people yelling at each other and neither side having a modified opinion.
I am too conservative for this damn forum my goodnessyes
I came up with all of that of my own accord i do take views from my parents, but they've never brought this up with me, i just look forward see all this stuff like human augmentation coming within my lifetime and say "what has the world come to?"excuse me but where does human augmentation come in to someone being into the rooster
don't tell my mom i said those things i'll be grounded againi bet you didn't even ask her permission first to go online you troublemaker
hidden bias in the fact that kimon writes LGBT+ only instead of LGBT+ catering.when i make a topic for parkour enthusiasts, let's say, i would logically assume anyone who comes is most likely a fan of parkour. However, if i say ONLY for parkour enthusiasts, my intent was to make sure the people who come only conform to one ideal.if that's the case then i have zero issues with this
take the only out of your title:and it suddenly becomes mundane and not crazy, and not worthy of mockery.
I think you don't understand. Aloveual people can still be romantically attracted to people. Which means that, undoubtedly, loveual and romantic attraction are two different things! They probably match for most people, for example a homoloveual guy would most likely only be romantically attracted to guys, but it's still definitely a separate thing.that's exactly the point
Well, it isn't going down that road at all. I'm not even sure that's a thing in the first place, but I think that's a discussion for a different time. Romantic orientation is definitely a thing! I think Crunk's point was that aloveual people are basically proof that it is, since being aloveual doesn't mean you can't have a romantic relationship. :Pi refer you to the above post
loveuality and religion are very much differentthat's not what i meant
aloveuality is a loveuality because they did not choose to be aloveual, though you can choose to be atheist. simple as that.
that's different than romantic orientationthat's going down the is-atheism-a-religion thing though and we already have one thing causing an argument that won't be resolved
but you're assuming that they EXCLUSIVELY use skittlr.you make a decent point
you must only want to talk to Blockland players and no other kind of gamer because you use BLF!
oh wait, no, you're part of a community and you have common interests and experiences that maybe other gamers don't
i wasn't claiming straight-only social media existed, i was responding to blueblur's hypothetical.it's not a dating site though is my problem
the problem is that the people criticizing skittlr want to have it both ways: they want to complain about people who don't fit in the heteronormative box when they're on a shared service but then complain when non-hetnorm gets its own service. that's not working towards no judgements, that's asserting superiority (or trying to, anyway).
besides, who cares if there are some gay/bi/les/trans+ who want to find friends/romantic partners who are similar? why does it actually hurt you? nothing changes in your life because of FarmersOnly or BlackPeopleMeet or JDate
if they were actually on your straight-only social media you'd complain about how they're seeking attention etc. this actually removes them from your everyday life if you happen to be bothered by them. you can't just complain about seeing someone you don't like on the street and then yelling because they went back to their own house.straight only social media doesn't exist or if it does then the same critiques apply
truth bomb
