Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - H.R.P.

Pages: [1] 2
1
To try and justify the notion that something may be involuntarily promoted, and, thus, shouldn't be disturbed, is absolutely outrageous.  Not only are you accepting bias, but you're also dividing opinion from fact.  The fact: the word does not harm the person.  In many cases, the person convinces themself that it's offending to the extent of creating a standard within their head.  This can lead to several emotional aspects, such as depression, but it's still ultimately due to the person's interpretation of the word (unless you consider it to harm the body physically, such as in sight and sound). 

I understand that there are several attacks made to purposely harm people mentally, which are ultimately referred to as insult.  However, several terms, many of which I'm currently using, can promote this same establishment.  The words that fall into the catagory of being a "swear word" can be used for many things that aren't insult, such as emphasis, common referral, etc.

Regardless of the obvious points, every single word produced could be considered offensive.  Does this imply that we should quit using the english language as a whole because it may lead to emotional disruption?  Or, even, put ourselves in solitude due to paranoia of every inflicting event that occurs within the world?  I don't think so, but you may have a differentiating opinion.
I agree to what you're saying. I just failed to try and convey what I was.

I am not retiring my statements, but I wasn't expecting a debate, and nor do I intend on doing so.
There are truths to both sides of an argument, and as much as I would love to hear things from the view points of another person and try to extend my knowledge to help better my opinions, I was not hoping on doing so today (and not on this subject).

 I was not expecting anyone as in depth as you to bother and help answer questions like this topic, which is why I'm suffocating everyone with my opinions without much brown townysis.

We can accept what we want to believe, and I'll leave it at that. I was just trying to share my views to help add perspective to others, and if that was a failure, it isn't my interest to force people into seeing things my way.

2
Drama / Re: Zack the Zapper
« on: October 30, 2010, 08:52:26 PM »
Forgot to mention: I'm not linking the full.

It shouldn't be too hard to find.

3
Drama / Re: Zack the Zapper
« on: October 30, 2010, 08:47:14 PM »

4
I still cannot tell for the life of me if you are against cursing, for cursing, or pulling a philosoraptor.
I could explain in a way for you to understand fully what I mean, but that would take up another wall text, which I doubt anyone wants (including me).

Generally: I'm against the way some use it.

5
Since when did I say that I thought it didn't mean anything?
I know it's bad, but I was simply stating that kids think it's bad.
It is.
Read what I wrote before you post, moron.
I now see what you mean.

I misinterpreted it like this
"Kids don't cuss because it's bad, they cuss because they don't think its bad."
Does that make sense?

Order syntax is a bitch. Especially on a forum.

6

Are you implying that all individuals must abide by popular standard?  That's some pretty twisted logic, sir.
Understanding from that perspective would make it seem that way.

We all base our ideas of what people say on what we've understood the meaning of their words to be. They could have a completely different meaning of what the listener interpreted. That difference of our understanding of meaning is involuntary and shouldn't be attacked.
Someone might find a word to be negative, while someone else might find that word to be "just a word". Should the person who is offended by what they hear put aside their feelings because the other person believes that what they're saying isn't negative? You could say that they need to just suck it up and learn to accept the new. But, because the first person's understanding is involuntary, that wouldn't be so easy. It would be much easier if the second person push aside their beliefs because they don't have as much of a strong of a feeling as the first person towards what's said.

Excuse me if what I'm blabbering about makes no sense. You could disagree with me. But, what I've said to Calender can't be undone and if he has
a problem with it, too bad for you, deal with it.

7
Drama / Re: Zack the Zapper
« on: October 30, 2010, 07:54:05 PM »
In real Life. i am incredibaly Inteligent.
Ah, yes. This one too, I believe.


8
Drama / Re: Love topic.
« on: October 30, 2010, 07:45:52 PM »
I'm sure he was talking about why he loves them.

9
Drama / Re: NSFW
« on: October 30, 2010, 07:42:38 PM »
Want uncensored.
Easy as searching 'naked princess Rosalina' on Google. But, don't go posting it all over the Blockland forums; there's 4chan for that.

10
You're making yourself sound like an idiot, event though I know you are one.
Kids don't cuss because they think it's bad, and if you have a problem with it, too bad for you, deal with it.

The problem is that other people know it's "bad". Because you're too stubborn to realize this, you think it doesn't mean anything.

Others shouldn't deal with something you do because of your stupidity.

11
Drama / Re: Zack the Zapper
« on: October 30, 2010, 06:55:44 PM »
Here's more to that image.


12
Drama / Re: Zack the Zapper
« on: October 30, 2010, 06:49:47 PM »
I do believe I have something for this.


13
So does pretty much everything some people say, but they just keep on talking!
There is a difference between saying something stupid, and saying something littered with stupid things.

14
Why must we even swear?

It's unnecessary and connotates stupidity, the way most of you use it.

15
Drama / Re: Public Restrooms.
« on: October 30, 2010, 12:36:49 AM »
What you should do is: take a box with you to public areas and crap in the box instead. Then leave it there for the people who piss on the toilet seat.

Pages: [1] 2