1
Off Topic / Re: If you could go back in history, what would you change?
« on: April 23, 2014, 04:56:45 PM »
i'd be way less of a arrogant, conceited prick.
yes really.
yes really.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Was the code you're using made for Visual Studio? Because I know that Visual studio has applied a different syntax than traditional C++.what the hell are you talking about
Like your own?nah.
No one in their right mind should use Linux for daily use. It's not that type of OS. It's mostly people bragging that they know a lot about computers because we obviously know Linux is for hackers and stuff. They purposely made it difficult as forget to navigate because we all know the harder it is to use something the more of a hacker you are.lmao.
forget linux.
1. Typical users don't need to use Xubuntu or whatever other names they come up with for every dime-a-dozen variation of Linux. Just because Windows 8 doesn't suit your needs doesn't mean that it's bad for everyone. Since everything needs signatures, Microsoft has strived to try and reach out to developers of software to make sure as much legitimate software as possible is ready to use with Windows 8.i'm not talking about windows 8 software, i'm talking about non-microsoft signed OSes.
2. You don't have to use the store app. You don't have to use apps at all. If you're all up in arms about it, by all means, install things the classic way. Microsoft isn't trying to erase the desktop interface or anything.
3. Overclocking never was and never will be a manufacturer-supported dealing. Microsoft has no obligation to deal with your overclocking issues.
Once againi'm not even much of a fan of ubuntu anymore because canonical wants to breathe down my neck all of a sudden.
Think typical user mmkay?
Just because it makes it a pain to use some outdated (or otherwise obsolete) third-party devices and software doesn't make the whole thing trash. If you need to use ARM or unsigned systems (nice thing to note is that common Linux platforms such as Ubuntu work fine on windows with secureboot) you just have to find the appropriate workarounds. If that means windows 7 or a non-windows system, then by all means. It still doesn't make Windows 8 (or secure boot) trash.
I cited the task manager because you attacked it for having an 'absolutely terrible ui that shouldn't even be there'. I made a point-specific defense. As for secure boot, I think it's actually a great idea for the common user who won't be using the BIOS anyways (konboot you derp). You can access the BIOS if you need to anyways, and there is a specific process you can follow to take the computer off of secure boot if you seriously need to access the BIOS more than once or twice ever.no i was talking about the entire os's ui. it's like constantly playing oblivion.
Kaph is also full of it. The new task manager is far better, you can see measurements of not only Cpu and memory usage of every process, but disk usage and network utilization as well. There are literally no downsides.if i didn't like change then why would i switch to linux mint 16 as my primary os?
Sorry for being completely off-topic, but I had to type this as Kaph just needs to get his head out of the ground. He falls under one of those 'me no like change' caveman people.
wow are we still on the win8 hate bandwagon?with good reason lmao.
maybe if you loving tried it first, you could actually like it.i'd rather not contaminate my hdd with it.
Jesus forget I don't give a bag of richards what you think of Windows 8. If you don't like it, don't post, you dumb ape.kill all unneeded processes, and if you don't know which you don't need, screenshot your taskmanager's processes tab.