Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - chaseyqurt

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 465
1
Off Topic / Re: How will WW3 start?
« on: June 30, 2015, 03:37:17 AM »
the only realistic scenario for a world war 3 in the near future is in Europe supposing Russia carries out a successful campaign in the Ukraine and moves on invading the stuffty little nations of Europe like Finland and Sweden, inevitably causing a NATO response

any other geopolitical dispute (china-japan island dispute, islamic state/middle east, 'tension') isn't significant enough for many nations to make a call to arms.

the only time world wars start is over annexation conflicts. so something about russia probably.
this guy knows

2
Off Topic / Re: i spoke at my high school graduation
« on: June 19, 2015, 04:11:31 AM »
would've been a little better without the ritallin but good none the less, ur a pretty good public speaker

3
Off Topic / Re: Sony Vegas- opening eyes in first person
« on: December 15, 2013, 03:33:39 PM »
concave circles
This is not a thing.

Download after effects. Create a black solid layer, make an elliptical mask in the center to desired height and length. Feather it, animate as needed.

4
Off Topic / Re: weird food/drink combos you enjoy
« on: November 21, 2013, 12:02:08 AM »
water

5
Russia Today is a horrible source for information. Russia Today is a state owned news agency with an obvious anti-US bias.

Fair News is not conducted this way:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ugCIjzHptA

The front page of RT includes a USA link.
http://rt.com/usa/
All of the headlines serve to give the United States a bad image. RT's rhetoric and literature reek of bias and can't be trusted. RT is essentially Russian Propaganda Today.

That being said, if you actually read the document it doesn't say anything about any amount of troops staying in Afghanistan. US Military strategy in Afghanistan has changed. We'll probably see troop reduction in 2014 because the war is different now. US Foreign policy is to kick down doors in the night, train people, and kill people through camera lenses.

The government is going to shift money with this shift in strategy and alot of soldiers will get sent home. Afghanistan is a failed country. The ANSF is horrible and firefights/suicide bombings/etc are ingrained into contemporary Afghan culture. The persistence of extremist also means that there probably won't be an end to this but life goes on.   :cookie:

6
Off Topic / Re: Women to fight in America's elite military units
« on: June 19, 2013, 06:05:46 PM »
a helmet that offers full balistic protection is not practical, if it were we would have one

Eh, I knew the kinetic force would hurt regardless, though I don't know how truly effective Kevlar is. I know it isn't some magical bullet proof armor though.
kevlar is a thing of the past, we don't use kevlar anymore it's just the common name that people associate with any sort of bullet stopping material. most components of the US Armed forces use ceramic Small Arms Protective Insert (plates) inside of a myriad of plate carriers

The LWH is kinda lame because the cut is as akward as the PASGT. Ops-Core Helmets and Mich 2002 are much cooler but only necessary for operators and leadership

7
Off Topic / Re: Women to fight in America's elite military units
« on: June 18, 2013, 01:00:07 PM »
Still completely ignoring the point and not providing any sort of reference for your claims. The baseline will not be reduced to accommodate for women. The military doesn't work in this fashion, the military does not want to waste lives, if you are a liability in the field the military isn't going to let you go out on the field.

I don't really even understand the point you're trying to make with the second thing, war is hell and everyone knows it, no one goes into combat without the expectation of seeing some horrific things. Military service is voluntary in the United States, no one is forcing unfit women into combat, no one is being shoved into combat who does not want to or who can not handle it. A voluntary service like the military should be open to people of all genders, religion, and race. The make of the person does not matter, the only thing that matters is whether they can get the job done or not.

simplest terms possible since ur dumb - women dont have 2 fight but if they are capable why stop them

8
Off Topic / Re: Women to fight in America's elite military units
« on: June 18, 2013, 12:36:58 PM »
That's the catch. The test cases have had 100% failure rates.
there is no catch, when they pass they pass and that's it, the only people who become soldiers are people fit enough to be soldiers, and get the fuk outta here with 100% failure rates, don't bust out stupid stuff statistics like that unless you have a legitimate source.

the sole existence of a corporation is profit for the owner, and hiring less qualified employees hinders that, but there are still laws in place to force people to hire minorities.
this is the military dofus not a corporation lol

9
Off Topic / Re: Airsoft thread.
« on: June 18, 2013, 11:49:27 AM »
i wish someone made an FNP45 replica, coolest pistol ever



10
Off Topic / Re: Women to fight in America's elite military units
« on: June 18, 2013, 11:48:16 AM »
yall some iggnorant boys, who gives a forget if women are allowed into the military, if a woman can make it past whatever training is required for a SOF role she is fit to be SOF, if she can't then she isn't fit and that's it. The military does not care about accommodation, they do not want women or men to serve as SOF, they want warriors and thats it.


we aren't going to see women in the military for the purpose of political correctness or to appease certain groups, the military wants combat effectiveness, not positive PR

11
Off Topic / Re: Airsoft thread.
« on: June 17, 2013, 12:22:33 PM »
the difference between 300-400 is overall negligible, you're not getting any crazy range increases with a higher fps, a TBB does increase your FPS but that doesn't mean that FPS = Range. You'll honestly be fine with 300 FPS on a stock TM gun, the hopup is doing most of the range/accuracy work. If you stick a M90 in your JG ofcourse it's going to be stuffty but a 320FPS gun with good airseal and a r-hop is going to outrange your CYMA with a "new bucking and nub".


The single most important factor to range is hopup, not FPS. Increasing your spring gives you an increase in range but with the caveat of degradation of your gun, instead of sticking a higher spring in your gun just r-hop/flat-hop it and you'll get better results than you could ever get with a simple spring change.


@Zloff, the bushings don't matter, they use Nylon bushings which are just fine for sub 350 FPS. tms dont shoot at 100fps what are you saying lol, you're completely exaggerating what I'm saying


Once again, FPS is not as important as you want it to be, I'm sure everyone thinks they're an awesome airsmith super good tech because they open their gearbox and shim and change springs but the reality is that there's much more to upgrading than what you think their is.

Basically
FPS = Minor/Not major contributor to range, obviously main contributor to velocity
Houp = Major contributor to range
Barrel/Airseal = Major contributor to accuracy
Motor/Battery/Electrical (Wiring, good trigger contact, mosfet) = Trigger response and ROF
Gears/Piston/Bushings/Shim/Etc = Reliability and performance overall

Doing things like making sure you have correct AOE, a good airseal, and changing your tamiya to deans are all upgrades that are more worth it than FPS. I'm not denying FPS as an important factor but stop obsessing over it, every post is hurrr my gun shoots at XXX FPS.


edit: let's just leave the conversation at this instead of clogging up the thread with this discussion, if you still care about it feel free to pm me at which point i will not respond

12
Off Topic / Re: Airsoft thread.
« on: June 16, 2013, 06:21:34 PM »
facts
how many m4s have you used

13
Off Topic / Re: Airsoft thread.
« on: June 16, 2013, 05:45:14 PM »
none of that is true lol
magazine and stock are debatable depending on model but the grip thing is objectively false

14
Off Topic / Re: Airsoft thread.
« on: June 16, 2013, 05:13:26 PM »
There are many gun models with these functions what are you talking about lol
TM has plastic internals, CYMA's are steel. You understand that steel is stronger than plastic, right?
Nowadays CYMA uses steel
An alike gun with metal internals and a spring just as weak as a TM's will last even longer and perform just as well, if not better(remember, steel is stronger than plastic), you can install a good hop-up system in any gun, and 280 FPS is fine for CQC but not so much for field

If you're happy with spending a ridiculous amount of cash on something that isn't near worth it then whatever it's your loss lol. Have fun on the "TM is always best" band wagon
CYMA does not make a gun with simulated recoil like the TM function, I'm not talking about electronic blowback, I'm talking about the shock recoil system. Unless you install mosfet you won't get an actual functioning bolt catch, I'm talking about the gun locking up when your magazine is empty. There isn't any brand outside of Systema that includes that as a stock feature. What the forget are you even talking plastic internals? Please list for me, the parts inside of a TM gearbox, that are metal in a clone gearbox but are plastic in a TM.

I just told you that TMs are expensive, I don't even own a TM, that doesn't mean they aren't good guns. If you don't like TM that's fine but I'm going to stand by the fact that they're one of the top airsoft manufactures. Just because you can't afford LBT doesn't mean Flyye is better than it, the same applies here, let's move on.


again btw just want to reiterate this, fps does not = range, your fps does not matter as much as you want it to

15
Off Topic / Re: Airsoft thread.
« on: June 16, 2013, 03:13:25 PM »
still won't have the simulated recoil or functioning bolt catch and if you think simply a shimjob, m100/m90 spring, and bucking + nub is going = better than TM quality ur a silly man. TM full metal bodies are 10x better than CYMA pot metal bodies and the internals are still much more reliable than anything you'll get in a CYMA. CYMAs are decent guns for their price but don't kid your self by saying that a few minor upgrades is going to set it at the same level as a TM. TMs are great guns, if you leave a TM stock it is going to have superb exterior quality, supreme performance, and unquestionable reliability, the only caveat is a lower FPS which doesn't matter because the hop-up is going to give you excellent range.

The price is high compared to other options but denying TM as one of the best brands is dumb, I'd rather skirmish a TM over a CYMA/JG/whateverotherchinaclone any day of the week.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 465