However, Sirrus, let's say he looked at a flower and instead of thinking, "Oh wow, what a beautiful flower!", he thinks, "This flower looks sad to me, so ill try to capture that feeling." Obviously, I don't know if that's true, but it would fit what both he and you are saying; his reasoning for the coloring, and the general idea for photography is that what is portrayed in the photo is what you were envisioning while you were taking the picture. But don't take my word for it. I'll let Quint decide how close I got to what he meant.
This sums up my intentions pretty well.
Currently I am in a sad, lonely, depressed, and somewhat cold mindset. These are the feelings that I wanted to portray in my pictures. I specifically chose not to deal with some of the happier photographs because I felt they couldn't express my emotions. In my opinion I have expressed my feelings quite well in many of my photos. I am certainly not targeting a joyful, fulfilled audience - I'm targeting an audience with a similar mindset to mine. This, in my opinion, does not make me a bad artist. I think that's a very ignorant comment considering that the very definition of art, "The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture", in no way suggests that a single object must be portrayed the same way by everybody, and if it isn't, that they are a bad artist. Perhaps I should have given context. I think it has to be taken into account that I've been doing this for less than two months, and these are things I'm going to learn along the way - these are things I'm learning on the way. I do, as always, appreciate the criticism. I'm sure that it will help me become a better artist.
Might I add that many of the objects I've photographed have originally seemed to portray my state of mind, and that that is what has drawn me to them.