1
Clan Discussion / Re: .
« on: November 13, 2009, 10:07:52 PM »"ogm i lead an 18 person group in a non-competitive online lego game! i cant take the presur!Ur jus jelus.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Clan Discussion / Re: .
« on: November 13, 2009, 09:44:55 PM »
I'm so glad that Randomguy is stable.
3
Off Topic / Re: Water on the Moon!
« on: November 13, 2009, 09:33:02 PM »NetWars said to me.Yeah bitches, I contribute to threads before they are even up.
Suck it.
4
Off Topic / Re: Omegle, funny conversations. Post them here.
« on: November 13, 2009, 05:45:56 PM »
If I had known this would've been bumped, I would've saved the 2 hour conversation I had with someone about our trials and tribulations as being a land elf and a sea elf.
I was the sea elf, and I had just taken a small armada and gained my first wife; she could not move due to being pleasured so much.
I was the sea elf, and I had just taken a small armada and gained my first wife; she could not move due to being pleasured so much.
5
Off Topic / Re: Political Correctness
« on: November 12, 2009, 11:56:16 PM »
people are not fat, they are gravitationally challenged.
6
Off Topic / Re: Are Failed Nations a greater threat to us then stable ones?
« on: November 12, 2009, 11:30:08 PM »
I was going for more of a weapons sense.
7
Off Topic / Re: Are Failed Nations a greater threat to us then stable ones?
« on: November 12, 2009, 11:15:34 PM »
Well 'terrorists' would easily be a higher threat depending on where they are.
Why so? Because depending on where they are, a country might want to 'sponsor' them in order to gain some control of the lands in that area. As a theoretical example (as in, my dad told it to me but i have no proof to back this as being fact): lets say that Sudanese militia needed weapons, preferably the losing team. Now lets add that sudan (in theory) has major oil supplies, and that china needs more oil exploits. China could give guns to a side, and in return would have access to some of that team's conquered lands.
However for a stable nation, they have to rely mostly upon themselves, whereas 'undeveloped' nations suckle off of other countries in order to get the things that they need.
Also, in order to get MAJOR damage weapons, a country's scientists could easily go to a different country and get information from them, and then apply it back in their home country.
Why so? Because depending on where they are, a country might want to 'sponsor' them in order to gain some control of the lands in that area. As a theoretical example (as in, my dad told it to me but i have no proof to back this as being fact): lets say that Sudanese militia needed weapons, preferably the losing team. Now lets add that sudan (in theory) has major oil supplies, and that china needs more oil exploits. China could give guns to a side, and in return would have access to some of that team's conquered lands.
However for a stable nation, they have to rely mostly upon themselves, whereas 'undeveloped' nations suckle off of other countries in order to get the things that they need.
Also, in order to get MAJOR damage weapons, a country's scientists could easily go to a different country and get information from them, and then apply it back in their home country.
8
Clan Discussion / Re: The Craftsmen - Motto lols ended because it is no longer original
« on: November 12, 2009, 11:09:42 PM »
Can I claim page 123?
10
Off Topic / Re: Blockland Key Raffle - Admissions
« on: November 12, 2009, 09:24:06 PM »
My fickleness says otherwise.
11
Off Topic / Re: You laugh, you lose V.2.1 (NEW)
« on: November 12, 2009, 08:37:11 PM »That is a win.That was in perfect rhythm to the song i was listening to, twas epic.
12
Gallery / Re: Pirate Ship
« on: November 11, 2009, 10:05:45 PM »Don't forget the ever trusty thrusters.
Its alright, but could use some more shape to it.
Example being that you could make different parts of the ship reasonably different in elevation from the water, or giving the flat sides some girth.
Otherwise speaking though, i like it.
13
Gallery / Re: Taiwan Build
« on: November 11, 2009, 10:03:35 PM »
No, I'm saying the exterior needs improvement, while simultaneously disproving your cover-up of "I told people that this is just something to customize".
Please, spice this up like a mexican lady would spice up beef.
Please, spice this up like a mexican lady would spice up beef.
14
Gallery / Re: Craftsman App
« on: November 11, 2009, 10:02:17 PM »
I voted NWB just to be evil.
In all seriousness though; this has potential to be wicked awesome, you just haven't fed it what it needs.
In all seriousness though; this has potential to be wicked awesome, you just haven't fed it what it needs.
15
Off Topic / Re: Greatest band ever surperpoll.
« on: November 11, 2009, 08:30:49 PM »It's still missing Radiohead.I agree, Radiohead deserves to at least be on the list.