Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Aide33

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 584
Off Topic / Re: racist watch | DOXX a """"Nazi""""
« on: Yesterday at 06:47:54 PM »
You literally said Canada in your post you tard. If your going to bullstuff at least be able to back it up.
yeah, people make mistakes, i corrected it, what more do u want? a handjob? some chocolate? a kiss on the cheek?

Off Topic / Re: racist watch | DOXX a """"Nazi""""
« on: Yesterday at 04:42:51 PM »
If you fear your own convictions bc of other ppl then you're spineless and have none to begin with
also this is true

just like how u told me the other day that the "regressive" left keeps pushing you towards the right because you dont want to be associated with them xd

Off Topic / Re: racist watch | DOXX a """"Nazi""""
« on: Yesterday at 04:38:15 PM »
Damn you just proved right here that you have absolutely no clue what you're talking about lmao.

i meant the new brunswick (, woops. albiet it's not half the voters but you know what i mean, my bad.
literally half of the seats are conservative and there is a strong conservative presence where i've lived my entire life.
>you live in loving Canada
>you live somewhere in eastern Canada on top of that.

Yeah I'm calling bullstuff on this, and considering you lied about above there is absolutely no reason to believe any of the stuff that spews out of your mouth.

like how can i prove it to you besides look at the voting patterns for southern new brunswick? the fact that new brunswick has a conservative government? etc. etc.

like im not making this up, it doesn't take a 400 iq to know that if you come out as gay in a conservative area you will get stuff done to you, people get beat up, some people in my family have been literally disowned for being gay

ill take pictures of the confederate flags if I see them again, but they are literally not that rare in northern maine/rural new brunswick. I was shocked at it too. you can pretend rural canada isn't as redneck and reactionary as the deep south usa but that's deeply untrue in certain areas

Off Topic / Re: racist watch | DOXX a """"Nazi""""
« on: Yesterday at 03:37:28 PM »
So this is a vengeance quest?
Retaliation, even against those who never witnessed or participated in the eras you're angry about?
no it isn't i'm highlighting the inherent hypocrisy of people who whine about putting minorities in the media (saying that media representation shouldn't matter) then complaining about the media not representing themselves

if you think minorities creating media or participating in anything related to the media is a vengence quest you are unbelievably retarded and cant read my posts
brother YOU'VE never lived in a heavily conservative town, you're loving Canadian on the Atlantic coast so get the forget outta here you retarded ass punk ass friend ass stuff.
you literally don't know where i've lived lmao don't try to tell me i didn't see literal confederate flags hanging on barns near my house, there are more than enough maxime bernier supporters around me, literally half of the voters vote conservative in canada AND in the USA don't you guys try to suddenly say that conservatives literally dont exist and you are some poor oppressed minority.

Off Topic / Re: racist watch | DOXX a """"Nazi""""
« on: Yesterday at 12:53:13 PM »
-signed someone who doesn't know that the vast majority of meda is heavily leftist
cnn called me a racist I'm now gonna cry because I'm a special little snowflake that needs a conservative bubble of opinion

also its almost like if you are lacking representation in media hmmmmmmm I wonder how black communities felt when there where no black people on tv or in videogames hmmmmm

Off Topic / Re: racist watch | DOXX a """"Nazi""""
« on: October 19, 2019, 09:58:47 PM »
except thats pretty accurate
-signed someone who's never lived in a heavily conservative town/country ever

Off Topic / Re: racist watch | DOXX a """"Nazi""""
« on: October 19, 2019, 07:25:35 PM »
there is no breach of privacy. all information released is literally public information. nobody will know who you are or where you live unless you voluntarily divulge this information
i think doxxing can be considered a crime when you are publicly displaying private information (aka a phone number that is not public) or something

also having a database of these doxes sounds like its inciting violence or literally targetted harassment, which could be considered a crime(?idk)

Off Topic / Re: racist watch | DOXX a """"Nazi""""
« on: October 19, 2019, 06:46:27 PM »
Alright, then antifa can't wear masks anymore.
ok go rip their masks off then lol

it not being a right doesn't require them to not be anon lol

same goes for the internet, just because it's not a right doesn't mean everyone's screen names should be their name

i agree with you doxing is bad lol, but this is a leap in logic

Off Topic / Re: racist watch | DOXX a """"Nazi""""
« on: October 19, 2019, 04:38:25 PM »
he could be you

he could be me

he could be anyone one of us

Off Topic / Re: ever dig through your old forum posts?
« on: October 19, 2019, 11:55:26 AM »
Yes, and I miss it all.  I spent so much time here just to forget almost everything and now it's all coming back. A lot of the context is lost and almost all of the images are gone but it's still nice to go back and remember all the jokes, forum adventures, dramas, forum wars, but most of all the people. Looking at my last post I felt the same way.
holy forget i haven't seen you in a while

Off Topic / Re: Post real life pictures of yourself.
« on: October 18, 2019, 04:37:01 PM »
woah this hit me so hard it blew me into another account

i'm ngl

this is actually pathetic, how much money did you spend on this place?

I think P2P web is the future, just not the immediate future. I agree with Deus though, it's not really the government's job to delay technological advancement because they can't curate it, I don't think they could stop the idea of P2P even if they wanted to.
theres some pretty big tech hurdles that need to be gapped before p2p becomes the standard

the ethereum project is a good example of it getting better and better tho

Off Topic / Re: pride month 5 thread
« on: October 17, 2019, 07:26:23 PM »
except they weren't saying "it's in nature therefore it's right" they were giving counterexamples to the ridiculous claim that cavemen didn't engage in homoloveual behavior. don't be dumb
whatever, I may have interpreted it wrong, but you get my point

also the claim that animals participate and participated in homoloveual behavior doesn't prove the claim that cavemen didn't do it. a better argument would be to literally point towards cave paintings and really old art about it (which exists to my knowledge). like how Romans and Greeks engaged in it but they were far from overpopulated.

maybe I'm taking deus exe's stuffty posts way too seriously though

Drama / Re: forget off with your big avatars
« on: October 17, 2019, 07:04:49 PM »

Off Topic / Re: pride month 5 thread
« on: October 17, 2019, 06:52:14 PM »
the argument is that homoloveuality is unnatural. the natural counter argument is 100% valid because homoloveuality is found commonly in nature, therefore it factually cannot be deemed unnatural.

rape is bad, yes. however it is objectively bad especially when it presents itself in a human society. homoloveuality is subjectively bad because people think it's unnatural when in reality they are just ignorant. and this isn't really a rhetorical question directed at you, but just a general idea: other animals can freely explore their loveuality but humans can't explore their own via consensual and safe means because of this ancient-founded notion that it's unnatural?
no i'm not saying being gay is bad

im saying an appeal to nature is a bad argument

That which is natural, is good.
N is natural.
Therefore, N is good or right.

is the equivalent to saying

That which is unnatural, is bad or wrong.
U is unnatural.
Therefore, U is bad or wrong.

both are wrong.

deus ex was arguing that it was wrong because it's "its natures response to overpopulation" whatever that means

and the other guys counter-argument was it's right because it's seen in nature. I see where you are coming from in that the logical counter-argument to "it's unnatural therefore it's wrong" would be "here's examples of it in nature" but that's implying that "what is natural is right" which is not necessarily true.

both "it's unnatural therefore it's wrong" and "here's examples of it in nature, therefore it's right" appeal to nature which is not a sound argument on it's own, there are other waaaaay more convincing arguments for homoloveuality.

now if the argument is "homoloveuality is unnatural" then you open up a whole other can of worms and I agree with you that a counterexample to disprove this would be "here's homoloveuality in nature" but this conversation includes nothing about whether homoloveuality is morally right or wrong, which was the point of the conversation in the first place. Proving homoloveuality can be seen in nature brings nothing to the table in terms of proving it's ethical or not or if it should be allowed or not and it's a stuffty argument.

it isn't a naturalism fallacy though?
you're right I confused it with an appeal to nature

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 584