1
Off Topic / Re: how have the last 5 years been for you?
« on: February 11, 2024, 06:40:41 AM »
...this place is still around? Oh god, my memories are starting to come back.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
The fact that you handicaps are sitting here not understanding why you're part of the problem is why you're part of the problemWould you actually care to explain
this puts into words the inane double standards/issues of modern far left ideology pretty well. too bad it also carries insults and snide comments, which enable the target audience (people on the left that dont realize their extreme overcompensation) to paint him as biased rather than trying to be reasonable here.Not sure I agree, and I'm fairly liberal for American standards while being critical of authoritarian tactics from the left.
if there wasnt any of that i would share this with any extreme left person i know/meet
You guys can keep fapping to your socialist utopia all you want, Venezuela's current stuff-ridden state and the UK's year-long wait list for toe surgery are proof enough that we don't need that dumb stuff over thereOk fine, then let's try asking you specifics:
Some social programs are necessary but let's not pretend like most of them are a bandaid and not a solution to any problem the people under them have
you can just ask if you want a hell in a cell matchDeus Ex will use his favorite Annoying Orange-style WWE moves.
I don't eat crow because I made a wrong assumption, lmfao
I said I thought it would be a lefty, I was wrong, oh well, I'm not gonna apologize or cry over it, forget off
All you have is mockery when people make valid points that you can't respond to, clitsniffer
You can literally say the same about yourself, at least I'm not making the surface level corporate spoon-fed assumption here
even better
False flag attack by some dipstuff antifa type is more likely than a right wing terrorist plot.
The timing so close to midterms is too convenient, for one. This would just energize the democratic base.
Someone smart enough to make the bombs also wired them in such a way that they would not detonate at all.
Whoever sent these had no intention of harming anyone. This is just a scare tactic and people are already smelling the rat stuff
from a biological standpoint rape is a superior reproduction strategy. morals are arbitrary. saying incest is immoral is literally a baseless argument because morals are subjective and don't actually exist. is it immoral in the united states? how about in africa? middle east? rather than get some specific sociology answer for each you just say forget it and realize that morals don't exist.I'm not saying morality in the context of human beings is objective, but you can absolutely make an evolutionary argument that no, incest is immoral and undesirable. It results in bad biological results, therefore that influences our perception that it's bad. Biology doesn't make morality objective, but it does influence it and you can say no, this is a bad decision to make in that context.
incest is unnatural. but it's one unnatural behavior that composes the thousands of unnatural behaviors humans exhibit. it's also probably the least damaging of all of them. other unnatural behavior includes alcohol consumption, overeating, and Self Delete
Likewise higher prevalence of genetic immunity and good traitsHow does incest produce a higher prevalence of good traits? The cons greatly outweigh the benefits.
And i don't think anyone here is giving a good answer either.
"Incest is immoral" "Incest is unnatural" but that's not an answer, that's just restating the question: why is it immoral/unnatural
Biologically, two sets of genes mating that come from the same parents is beyond dangerous for offspring.
It makes perfect sense why human beings have evolved to show disgust towards incest...
...Morality partially stems from evolution and biology. There are legitimate moral grievances to be had.
It's not morally wrong or right for two consenting adults to have love.We were talking about incestuous relationships, not just two consenting adults.
There are legal arguments against incest, just like there are legal arguments against loving dogs. But there are no moral or religious arguments for either one. It's still loving disgusting to forget dogs thoughWrong. Morality partially stems from evolution and biology. There are legitimate moral grievances to be had.