### Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

### Messages - fireball

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
1
##### Off Topic / Re: My Gecko in full HD
« on: December 18, 2009, 10:31:42 PM »
You should film her eating a cricket

2
##### Off Topic / Re: My Gecko in full HD
« on: December 18, 2009, 07:00:17 PM »
Nice crestie! I didn't think anyone else liked them here. lol

3
##### Off Topic / Re: Man boobs.
« on: November 02, 2009, 07:45:19 PM »
This topic was a trap! D:

4
##### Off Topic / Re: Your school classes (period by period).
« on: November 02, 2009, 07:42:04 PM »
1. AP English 12
2. Biology 2
3. Astronomy
4. Weight Training
5. AP Calculus

5
##### Off Topic / Re: 2012 Second Thoughts
« on: October 14, 2009, 04:35:20 PM »
all the planets will line up which has the potential to knock Earth off it's axis
The combined gravitational pulls of the moon and the sun only causes the seas to rise a few feet. The other planets gravitational effects on earth are VERY minuscule in comparison. Just about anything is possible but this has roughly the same probability of occurring as you gaining the ability to fly with your ears and breathe pink fire through your naval the next time you wake up.

6
##### Off Topic / Re: Grumpy's Algebraic therory
« on: October 03, 2009, 05:25:58 PM »
x=y
x=x
1=1
Dividing by x wasn't what really broke the problem though. Dividing by x is normally perfectly legal unless it has been forced to equal 0.

2x=x
2=1
It only broke by dividing by x there because I already divided by x-y a few steps prior which can only equal 0. It changed the graph of the line from y=x [an infinite number of solutions] to a single point [Only one solution, (0,0)] and since x can now only equal 0 at that step, dividing by 0 a second time only breaks it even more and changes it again from one solution to no solution.

7
##### Off Topic / Re: What was your very first post?
« on: October 03, 2009, 11:06:21 AM »
My first post that I can find was when I got the gold hook in back in 05. Only 5 people had it then.

8
##### AoT General / Re: What happened to these guys?
« on: October 02, 2009, 10:06:30 PM »
I miss the old days.

9
##### Off Topic / Re: Grumpy's Algebraic therory
« on: October 02, 2009, 09:53:55 PM »
Find the slope of the graph of y = (x-3)^1/2 when x = 2.

10
##### Off Topic / Re: Grumpy's Algebraic therory
« on: October 01, 2009, 09:12:49 PM »
x=y
x^2=y^2
xy=y^2
xy-x^2=y^2-x^2
-x(x-y)=(x+y)(x-y)
-x=x+y
2x=y
2x=x
2=1
1=0

No me

11
##### Off Topic / Re: Grumpy's Algebraic therory
« on: October 01, 2009, 09:03:45 PM »
D^2 / (B-D) = Hawt

12
##### Off Topic / Re: Gecko
« on: September 25, 2009, 02:20:51 PM »
What kind of gecko?

13
##### Off Topic / Re: If You Fail To Fail, Do You Succeed? Or Fail?
« on: August 29, 2009, 06:36:27 PM »

14
##### Off Topic / Re: Rating Girls
« on: August 11, 2009, 07:15:11 PM »
What I don't get is why people think asses are hot. Seriously. stuff comes out of there.
This

15
##### Off Topic / Re: Impossible Math
« on: July 29, 2009, 12:42:50 PM »
I see your logic, but it's an issue of semantics as to whether the problem is broken or not. When you divide by the same number on both sides of the equation, even if it is undefined, the equality remains true.
The problem is, we are dividing out variables, which cuts out solutions. The equation is still true, but you just got rid of an infinite number of solutions. Normally, this would be okay and we could plug in what we get from the new equation to check for extraneous solutions in the original equation. But, the variable in the parenthesis (x-y) can ONLY equal 0. Dividing by 0 is an illegal step. The problem is obviously broken by that step.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10