Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Are you mentally loving handicapped?derogatory insult, ad hominem
Not shooting but relevantyup, one example proves my entire point wrong.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/22/us/six-baltimore-officers-indicted-in-death-of-freddie-gray.html?_r=0
You sound like a tribal imo
People are equal already, shove off with this gender and racial extremism stuff. If you want to be treated like normal act normal. forget.how can you look at objective information that contradicts your claim and still think everyone is equal?
http://www.polygon.com/2015/6/13/8775455/super-smash-bros-roy-ryuIM loving MELTING
ITS loving HAPPENING GET HYPED BOYS
Police Brutality seems, at least from my view, to be more of an issue of police not adhering to standards rather than just race/love.it's definitely about race, there's a reason you don't see black officers shooting black unarmed teenagers
Men are assaulted just the same as women. It doesn't matter if it's more common for either love; the fact that it happens is the issue.ooh nope nope nope nope nope this is so bad dude i'm sorry. it's INCREDIBLY important that it happens so much more commonly to women.
I wouldn't say the wage gap is specifically American, and I'd assume that all over the world people are paid less than others based on all kinds of meaningless qualities outside of love and race. Again, I'd argue this is to do with a lack of specific standardised pay rates.i don't know if this is how it goes in australia, but big american corporations (with VERY few exceptions) are some of the most trashy collections of human beings in the world. for instance, disabled/handicapped workers for walmart (i believe it was walmart; correct me if i'm wrong) are sometimes paid less than 5% of minimum wage because of legal loopholes. many employers simply pay women less and then make up stuffty excuses for it
I disagree with her and her opinions. I cannot see how American/Western culture is "devaluing" women or people of colour. I think that's the stupidest comment made in this entire thread.then you probably lack perspective on police brutality, violence against women, the wage gap, the list goes on. thankfully, it used to be a hell of a lot easier to be a white male in contrast to the rest of the human population, but there's still a lot of work to do.
Personally don't like feminism because egalitarianism seems far better. It's based on the concept that everybody is equal, which goes with my theory that everybody (including me and you) is a forgetin' idiot. Feminism on the otherhand seems like it's only trying to apply itself to women's rights (aka special snowflake syndrome).of course feminism is only trying to apply itself to women's rights, men have it absurdly easy. it's amazing to me that a community of gamers doesn't recognize this, when the gaming community is an absolute stuffHOLE for women. egalitarian is an eventual goal, but the deeply ingrained attitude against women in this country prevents it from being practical in the immediate future.
Another thing; I'd rather have a thousand tribal, loveist writers with the freedom to express their opinions and an audience who can choose to play or not, over having 2 writers who are strictly making games with the express purpose of being equal to everybody, meeting diversity targets and are not allowed to express their own opinions and biases through their own produced content.that's a false dichotomy - also, racism and loveism in media are loving poisonous. just one tiny example is the subtle psychological effects of misogynistic advertising, in which malleable, stupid americans are exposed to anti-woman ideals and are willing to believe them. remember what i said about considering this from a stupid person's perspective? you don't agree with my point because you can't possibly imagine being affected by the media around you, but most people are, and that's a fact. and seriously, that's a logically fallacious setup; false dichotomies don't provide anything in rational debate.
[img]http://static.fjcdn.com/large/pictures/22/96/229660_5371731.jpg[/img]"people are critically brown townyzing popular media for harmful messages? damn it"
Hehe
Oh hey it's Daedalus, the great oppressor who thinks voiceless parts of California remain part of the state.ehh you're gonna have to elaborate on that, of course they do
no, he's making a pretty important distinction that has to be understood before continuing: feminism isn't a group, it's an idea. what it "does" isn't really important, because all it is is what it stands for and what that means in the context of the modern world. its effects are consequential.this
all you're doing is playing semanticsi'm not "playing" semantics, semantics are important. i have no idea what you're asking, it's like me asking "what has liberalism done recently" which is an equally broken and vague question. there are PEOPLE who support feminist ideologies (of which there are many subsets - consider the idiots who think eating foreign food is cultural appropriation, etc) and they fight for many, many different things. economic gains? legal gains? influence on public image? you don't have to be defensive, just ask a directed question. i love a good debate, but it's a two-way street when it comes to presenting content thoroughly.
you know exactly what I mean; you're just being intentionally difficult
speaking of arrogance loli'm responding appropriately to someone who can't possibly consider that maybe the question they asked is the problem, and not other people.
answer the question instead of deflectingi'm saying your question is structured loving poorly, stop being arrogant
Okay. What's going on then? What's feminism done lately?lmao, feminism is a set of principles, not a person who goes around and punches misogynists or whatever you're imagining
