Messages

2656

Drama / Re: Emo Freak v5

« on: August 22, 2014, 10:55:24 PM »

he may have kept his face out of the rooster pics but it's still got "Zach Staugaits" or whatever at the top

ogm guys you got me

OT: Yeah, I dont care how, but he really needs to stop. Theres a point that a repeated joke just gets old.

2657

Off Topic / Re: if you were a superhero, what would your name be

« on: August 22, 2014, 09:00:58 PM »

Zack....The Zapper.

Help, Zack The Zapper, someone is robbing the bank!

"S-T-T-T-T-T-O-O-O-O-P-p-ppppp---T-A-Z-Z-Z-Z-Z-IN--G ME B-R-R-R-R-R-O-O-O" ~Some Random Robber

"No, forget you." ~ZTZ

2658

Off Topic / Re: Fill in the _____

« on: August 22, 2014, 08:19:50 PM »

disgusting.

Help! I'm banned from Blockland because I _________!

2659

Drama / Re: Lock --> Another Player To Add To The Badmin List

« on: August 22, 2014, 08:12:08 PM »

Noedit:

Torak, there is no rule explicitly stating to stay 100% ontopic, no exceptions..

Aware's and Planr's statements are just as valid as anyone elses, because it still pertains to the server Lock himself was administrating on, and is still a valid point for discussion.

2660

Drama / Re: Lock --> Another Player To Add To The Badmin List

« on: August 22, 2014, 08:09:47 PM »

You guys don't know what Zack said, he only took the pics of me causing trouble, he was warned NUMEROUS times, was being a total nuisance to the server, and disrespecting server staff.

Where are your pictures, then? I insist, please, do, post them.

The only time I got angry was then you unjustly kicked me for shooting you out of vehicle while you were in the minigame.

Please, elaborate on how I was disrepspecting staff, I have made no rude remarks to either you nor the two Falco's present on the server up until the moments preceeding the ban.

Also, let me remind you of what you said:














If you honestly expect me to believe that one line I said came to be any near as close as how rash and completetly unwarranted this was, you are wrong.

Lock may have been causing the problem, but some of the things you said as well were unkind too, OP. I think both of you could have refrained from saying a multitude of things.

This all started when he kicked me for a bullstuff reason, but I do agree that I could have been less of a richard at the time, yes.

2661

Drama / Lock --> Another Player To Add To The Badmin List

« on: August 22, 2014, 01:20:52 AM »

Righteo, I was dissapointed in the lack of servers recently, but then found this gem:

"[]Falco[]'s 360 MLG Sniper DM" (or something along those lines.)

To see how possibly bad this could be, I joined.
To avoid too much of a pagestretch, I decided to only take the neccessary pictures. Do not whine for lack of context, for you shall get none.
I'll let the pictures do some talking:
(A picture after I was kicked for shooting Lock out of jeep while he was in the minigame):







And then he melts down after I asked the above question...










Wow. 10/10 ban reason, would totally take it again.





My apologies for the huge pagestretch, but a drama with pictures is better than one with no pictures.


PS: Could someone go on the server to get Lock's ID? I was unable to, and foolishly decided to not take a pic. of the original ban message.

PSS: There was no rules list that I saw, and the admins actively told people to "360" while using the RocketLauncher, no pictures of that though.

PSSS: Ofcourse I'm going to be mad when I get banned for no reason, don't ask.

2662

General Discussion / Re: New Boss Spawn For Pecon7's boss battles

« on: August 21, 2014, 08:24:52 PM »

The spawn you're showcasing here is practically a box too, though. Also, Pecon's has more detail, and neat features to this.

The one you built is very basic, perhaps add more detail.

That's my honest opinion.

2663

Drama / Re: 'Nizza Deuchsen Man' is a dumbass.

« on: August 21, 2014, 04:36:53 PM »

inb4frankie

Seriously, stop this bullstuff feud. He can post wherever he damn well pleases.


Secondly, that image doesn't prove stuff because all it is, is a picture of increased activity.

Expecting that people shouldn't randomly accuse him of DDoSing things?
Pfft, there goes Furdle and his ego again, amirite?

This is sarcasm, right? ....Right?

2664

Drama / Re: Betelgeuse and his 200 alts...

« on: August 21, 2014, 04:29:05 PM »

Lol, the "betelguese" person was me.....

One, we already know it was Acherus.


Two, saying stuff like this is admitance to trolling if it was you. Dont do that.

2665

Drama / Re: TB2/Game Makes himself look like a complete idiot.

« on: August 21, 2014, 04:18:57 PM »

The PM was unneeded on Furdle's part, especially the "enjoy your drama." Part, but TB2 is in the wrong here.

Pretty much this.

2666

Off Topic / Re: What do you love about the above user?

« on: August 21, 2014, 02:11:30 AM »

You have such a beautiful smile.

2667

Games / Re: Space Station 13 Blocklanders Group!

« on: August 21, 2014, 01:30:02 AM »

Zack (duh) (BYOND: Zack The Zapper ):                                                                              Time offset of 2 so...                    EST


EDIT: Also, stupid thing to ask, but what is the IP for the server? I want to manually add it to my bookmarks.

2668

Forum Games / Re: Give Facts About The Above User

« on: August 21, 2014, 12:59:45 AM »

Is probably a total stalker.

2669

Drama / Re: TB2/Game Makes himself look like a complete idiot.

« on: August 21, 2014, 12:53:24 AM »

I don't see any mistakes I've made. I have a lot of freetime, so I will alternate between playing and refreshing this topic. Honestly, you guys are supporting someone who has absolutely no evidence against me except a forum PM.

I'll try to keep the mindset Furdle is innocent until proven guilty.

I visited Game's driving server earlier, I got into a discussion of a script I have which improves the physics of blockland vehicles (basically makes the impact of two vehicles more realistic)

He tells me that I am lying about having the mod. Multiple people can confirm that I do have the mod.
I then explain to him that I will open a server and show it to him. He starts getting annoyed telling me to give him the mod to prove it (which is obviously something which I am not going to do)
I then leave with "If you PM me on the forums, I will gladly open a server and show you the mod in action"
to which I left, and was shortly greeted with this forums message.



Now let me explain if you haven't figured out already why he's an idiot.
Firstly, he tried to cry his way into me giving him a very good mod.
Secondly, he calls himself "staff" on his server. I don't even need to explain why this makes him sound like an idiot.
Thirdly, he thinks I will appeal to get unbanned on his server, through some bullstuff email system as if the forums PM don't work? The whole 'official' type deal with the server just makes you sound like a massive ballbag.

Support me or don't, I really don't mind. I think this is enough evidence to show idiocy.

Let's pick this out piece by piece.

I visited Game's driving server earlier, I got into a discussion of a script I have which improves the physics of blockland vehicles (basically makes the impact of two vehicles more realistic)

That's nice.

He tells me that I am lying about having the mod. Multiple people can confirm that I do have the mod.
I then explain to him that I will open a server and show it to him. He starts getting annoyed telling me to give him the mod to prove it (which is obviously something which I am not going to do)
I then leave with "If you PM me on the forums, I will gladly open a server and show you the mod in action"
to which I left, and was shortly greeted with this forums message.

I can understand someone not releasing their mod, in part or whole, if it's still under development, which in Furdle's case, it still is. So on TB2's part, you should not have to have a bit of code printed to you ingame to prove that he is in possesion of the mod, especially in a case where he offers to show it to him ingame, and yes, I dont care if he said
"I am not your bitch.", this is a community full of people that use profanity. It is something you need to not take offense to. While I would probably need more context, it was probably childish of Furdle to say this.

And on another note, whether or not you are against multiclienting, (which, although on a case by case basis, is on average stupid.), the fact he offered to show you the mod does not give you the right to just outright ban him for lying, when he was clearly offering to show it to you.

Also, "Known problem user"? What the forget? Although hosts can run their servers however they want, you should regard them as innocent until PROVEN guilty.

Now let me explain if you haven't figured out already why he's an idiot.
Firstly, he tried to cry his way into me giving him a very good mod.
Secondly, he calls himself "staff" on his server. I don't even need to explain why this makes him sound like an idiot.
Thirdly, he thinks I will appeal to get unbanned on his server, through some bullstuff email system as if the forums PM don't work? The whole 'official' type deal with the server just makes you sound like a massive ballbag.

Support me or don't, I really don't mind. I think this is enough evidence to show idiocy.

While I should say this is a bit of unneeded rashness on Furdle's part, it does not change the fact for the most part, it is right.

While I do disagree with Furdle in the sense that servers can be as "official" as they want to be, It does not change the fact that a bullstuff ban is okay in the scenario.

...just makes you sound like a massive ballbag.
lolwat
Support me or don't, I really don't mind. I think this is enough evidence to show idiocy.

Yes, the ban was idiotic, the reasoning was idiotic, all in all, this drama is succesful.

tl;dr: Furdle is banned for stuff reason, I agree with Furdle for most part.

Now let's go ahead and pull apart TB2's responses to this thread, or atleast the ones I feel I can respond to.

I'm not joining your server, so quit spamming the thread with "join my server".
I am not apologizing, there is nothing to apologize about.
I wanted to keep them on record for this very reason so I can use it against you.

This right here shows that your argument for him lying is automatically invalid, since you are refuting the very proof he is showing you.
This right here shows that you are not willing to accept you are wrong.
I have no solid opinion on this bit.

Apparently I am horrible for not ending my server to see Furdle's server.

While I do agree that keeping a server up to sate the fun requirements of your neigborhood Blockheadbots, but the evidence he was trying to show you would refute the ban you placed on him unjustly.

Honestly I didn't remember half those dramas, if I did, I'd post that there.I banned him for a statement he made after he quit, I refused to join his because I hate multi-clienting and I didn't want to shutdown. Honestly, there's 9 players on there, should I really end their fun because Furdle is advertising his server? I don't want to join his server because of this and I stopped hosting when I saw his PM.

So you banned him for a statement he said, but then go in your PM to say he was banned for three reasons? I'm not saying this is neccesarily bad, just confusing.
Half of this is petty preferences, the other half a legit point.

No (In response to when someone asked if you actually cared about the mod)

Yet again, this labels your ban reason for "Lying" entirely null and void.

I frown upon multi-clienting, and it lags my computer to the breaking point.

Half of this is petty preferences, the other half a legit point.

Also, there is literally nothing stopping you from joining after you were done hosting.

No, I was just curious how it works.

I thought you just said you didnt care?

I'm not even going to try to read Cruxeis' giant wall of text

You can practically kiss any chance of redeemability from this point on gone.

Okay everyone, threads over. Please take your giftbasket on your way out.

2670

General Discussion / Re: DayZ: Blockland {In Development}

« on: August 21, 2014, 12:18:12 AM »

The survival aspects should be running away from zombies, getting killed by other players etc
dying of hunger is the lamest thing ever, same goes to that heat mod thing where if you got too cold you'd die frozen, that was pure bs

That's the point of a survival game. What may seem "bull" or "pure bullstuff" is really an intended game mechanic.
Take for example, DayZ. Which I'm assuming this is based off of...
Now imagine requiring to eat, and the temperature* (if that's a thing in DayZ) was removed. *POOF*, gone.

This would cause more problems than good. Especially with balancing issues, regarding PvP.
*This is more a minority, but it's usually for the immersion aspect, but that's just my take on it.

Having to search for food, or finding fire for the night hoping your little shack is safe enough is an important part of games like this. And to talk about another one of your points, characters are supposed to die. Especially in a survival game like this, having the ability to build your character to a nigh invincible status, and the other players merely hope they can catch them unaware through guerilla tactics, is poor in game design.

This is especially evident when it comes to other PvP aspects, like I said earlier, to pitch a scenario:
-You and players 2-->10 (team 1) are in a group/clan/whatever.
-Through very coordinated scouting, you have obtained all of the ammo you could ever need, and have established a very functional base.
-Players 11-->21 (team 2) are not pleased with this, as they are raiders, and rightfully so, they should have all of the goodies.
-Team two decides to invade team one, bringing with them the most powerful items they could muster, but it simply wasn't enough.
-Team one decided to camp the doorway/camp the stairs/any other bottleneck point...resulting in the raiders losing all of their valuable stuff they hoarded, and team one coming out on top most likely unscathed, and probably even more powerful than they were before.

The point? This could have all been avoided if team one had any reason to leave the building, but they didnt. Team two just had to rush in and hope for the best.
Now let's edit the scenario, this time where if you dont eat food of some sort, you die.

-You and players 2-->10 (team 1) are in a group/clan/whatever.
-Through very coordinated scouting, you have obtained very little ammo, but a sufficient ammount of food, and have established a very functional base.
-Players 11-->21 (team 2) are not pleased with this, as they are raiders, and rightfully so, they should have all of the goodies.
-Team two decides to invade team one, bringing with them the most powerful items they could muster, deciding to keep people guarding the doorways so noone could escape.
-Team one wittled their food stores down until the very last /Jimmy Dean's Bacon Beans/ can was consumed, team one had to act today, but rushing out meant almost certain death. But it had to be done.
-Team one charged through the front doors guns blazing, and people fell on both sides left and right.
- In the end, what remained of team two, who had employed careful siege tactics, had won...
-team two...had won...despite the fact literally all raiders are pricks, this was well played.

Things like hunger or temperature, or any other misc. aspect like that is an integral part of this "survival" aspect I was talking about. I can understand dumbing it down like making hunger not kill you, but instead slow/weaken you, but please reconsider removing it.


tl;dr: removing hunger will cause backlash in one way or another, whether it be through PvP, or basic gameplay. Please reconsider.

EDIT: Good luck on this, Navaro, an actually well made zombie server in Blockland is long overdue.