Messages

496

Off Topic / Re: Princeton banned the word "man" on their campus.

« on: August 19, 2016, 08:29:41 PM »

You can't biologically change love. It's not possible.
Not in this life time.
Unless you can get real love organs cloned for you and then implanted then you can say your love has been changed.

Actually more likely than being revived from cryogenics.

497

Off Topic / Re: Princeton banned the word "man" on their campus.

« on: August 19, 2016, 08:19:10 PM »

polite =/= facts

Did you honestly think I was in some way trying to say that politeness is equivalent to being factual?
Politeness is the act of being a decent human being.
If you can't understand that you can be polite to someone, even if you believe they are wrong, then you're just thick.

You're just trying to now twist this into a reason to belittle/harass others.
Just FYI for anyone not in the know, Tony is now currently going to try to argue transgenderism and non-binary genders, because he knows that it's a divisive issue on this forum.
He's going to do that because it will distract people from actually arguing with him on the original subject of this topic, which he's been proven wrong about. So, don't feel any obligation to carry on with him, because he'll only build the exact same argument in a couple of days when he proves himself an idiot again.

498

Off Topic / Re: Princeton banned the word "man" on their campus.

« on: August 19, 2016, 08:05:30 PM »

The fact is though that there is only 2 real genders. You can't be non-binary. It's not biologically or scientifically plausible for a human.

It's not opinion, it's fact.

You don't have to agree with someone's beliefs, even if you think they have an opinion that isn't factually correct, in order to be polite to someone.

499

Off Topic / Re: Princeton banned the word "man" on their campus.

« on: August 19, 2016, 07:58:17 PM »

you can source whatever the forget you want
you can ram a spiked carrot up my ass in protest
you can hold me at gunpoint
you can do loving anything
but you can not loving convince me that there are more than two genders
it biologically makes no loving sense, and anybody who legitimately believes that there are more than two genders is a loving headcase
this is directed at anybody who involves themselves with lgbt stuff

Regardless of your opinion on the matter there are those who do identify as non-binary, or believe that non-binary genders exist.
It's no trouble whatsoever to minorly tailor your language to be non gender-specific, and thereby avoid offending anyone of any gender.

If they offer jobs for postpersons instead of postmen, it doesn't negatively impact anyone, and it doesn't exclude anyone.

500

Off Topic / Re: am 16 years old now

« on: August 19, 2016, 01:24:57 PM »

Do you feel......  fab?

Ha ha ha ha ha happy birthday

501

Off Topic / Re: the oldest picture in your picture folder

« on: August 19, 2016, 01:10:24 PM »

One of the oldest images I have, from February 2011. I have a couple of older things from 2009, but they're mostly photographs of school friends.

My friend is a Jehovas Witness and I had to explain this joke to him.
This isn't close to oldest, but enjoy this picture I drew of a happy Alpaca.

502

Off Topic / Re: [NEWS] Terror attack in Moscow thwarted by traffic cops

« on: August 19, 2016, 12:55:38 PM »

That war on Russia's not going so well for them then.

503

Off Topic / Re: Does anyone know how Bernie feels about how the DNC was rigged?

« on: August 19, 2016, 10:46:16 AM »

He told me he don't care, 'cause Hillary and the DNC are bitches, and bitches ain't stuff but hoes and tricks.

504

Off Topic / Re: Zendaya will be playing Mary Jane in the newest Spiderman reboot

« on: August 18, 2016, 10:04:38 PM »

they made aunt may a 20 year old hot milf this is far from the most drastic change

Aunt May is a big change too (the actress is older than she looks though), but we have had her getting increasingly younger across adaptations.


I'm not saying this change in MJ will ruin the movie, but it will take a bit to get used to.

505

Off Topic / Re: What was the most destructive disaster in history? (POLL)

« on: August 18, 2016, 10:01:15 PM »

I find it a bit creative to be talking in another font rather than the normal one. Also, aren't you glad that I don't speak in Wingdings?

It's quite distracting, and even a little uncomfortable to read such a harder and smaller font amongst the sea of regular font.
It would be quite appreciated if you didn't write in a different font, and found an alternate way to express your creativity.

506

Off Topic / Re: Zendaya will be playing Mary Jane in the newest Spiderman reboot

« on: August 18, 2016, 09:56:49 PM »

why isnt peter parker played by a middle aged man, still in high school?


looks are transient, its the story that gets adapted and worked into contemporary pieces of media and entertainment

Peter's image has changed in the last 20-30 years to be more boyish rather than bookwormish, but he retains his brown hair and lean/lanky body, which matches the looks of Maguire, Garfield and Holland.

Mary Jane though has pretty consistently been portrayed as a fairly curvy, pretty, long-haired red-head. Audiences aren't so familiar with any drastic changes to her appearance.

507

Off Topic / Re: Zendaya will be playing Mary Jane in the newest Spiderman reboot

« on: August 18, 2016, 09:48:36 PM »

disney bought the rights for spiderman from sony

Not quite. Sony still retain all rights but have come to a unique deal to collaborate with Disney/Marvel. They'll both get access to the same character, and can share other associated characters too.
Sony retains marketing control and will get a good amount of money from merchandising.

It's quite a mutual agreement. Sony gets more money with less risk (and retain their cashcow), while Marvel gets access to their star property again and can use him to boost their own projects down the line.

508

Off Topic / Re: Zendaya will be playing Mary Jane in the newest Spiderman reboot

« on: August 18, 2016, 09:35:31 PM »

Never heard of her. Google'd her, and she's pretty, but not what I would have imagined for Mary Jane.

I think most of that comes down to not being ginger. And I can't imagine this actress will look natural with ginger hair.

509

Off Topic / Re: What was the most destructive natural disaster in history? {POLL ADDED}

« on: August 18, 2016, 09:30:48 PM »

For reference, that's about 100 million people. Over two entire continents. Dead.
A decaRiddler of death.
And it's not even on the poll.

I wouldn't take what is/isn't on the poll to be indicative of anything, as it's a clusterforget of near-random disasters of completely incomparable scales of destruction and time, as well as non-disaster events like acts of war.

It's just a shambles. The real value of the topic is in the discussion.

510

Off Topic / Re: What's up ladies! I'm single and ready to-- (What did he say)

« on: August 18, 2016, 09:15:07 PM »

Sorry to be that guy, but shouldn't this really have gone in Forum Games?