Aparrently you haven't seen his streams either. He has said multiple times that "healthy people don't need to get the vaccine". That is harmful since it reduces the amount of people vaccinated and increases the threat to people who either cannot take the vaccine or have health/immune compromising conditions. Rogan has also pushed the "alternatives" like ivermectin, which discourages people from taking the vaccine.
The questions themselves wouldn't be harmful, but the guests then commonly proceed to bring misinformation to the discussion. The reason why this has to be so harshly judged is that Rogan's following is huge and what he says affects them.
I don't doubt that you trust peer-reviewed studies and PhDs on the vaccine issue, but the problem is that Rogan doesn't and he doesn't just invite the professionals on his show to talk about the vaccine. You might trust the official sources, but many of Rogan's followers wont.
The
Wikipedia article on Russian interference describes what happened. I don't know if you agree with what the article says on the matter, but if CNN misrepresented this information then please show me.
The Russian influence did not make the election illegimate since they never affected the voting process directly.
What do you mean with media companies determining what information can be taken into consideration?
The Russian collusionI don't know what statements you specifically mean on the Kyle Rittenhouse coverage, but we don't have to go there since it might get muddled with what was known at the time, when each statement was made, etc.
One image doesn't mean anything, stats please.
CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, are not good, but they're more accurate than Fox news.
Idk what else to argue about the national TV, so I'll leave it.