Messages

46

Drama / Re: Cca possibly using BLHack.dll

« on: April 05, 2014, 09:23:07 PM »

but didn't someone use blhack on zapk's rising lava to float and that made him invincible and win?

Yeah, Cca did.

47

Drama / Re: Cca possibly using BLHack.dll

« on: April 05, 2014, 06:08:33 PM »

I was done using it to cheat in games.

Why should you be trusted? The last time the issue of you cheating was brought up, you lied about using BLHack then tried desperately to discredit me by lying through your teeth. You seem to have issues with lying in my opinion.

48

Off Topic / Re: What would your last words be?

« on: April 05, 2014, 01:47:49 PM »

"I think you should call the doctor"

49

Drama / Re: Cca possibly using BLHack.dll

« on: April 05, 2014, 01:30:00 PM »

In extension, it is Badspot who determines if said hacks are illegal or otherwise permitted.  What the EULA does is give Badspot the right to decide this with effective legal stand, since Badspot owns the rights to his own game.  Since Cca hasn't been banned, either Badspot hasn't been online, or he wants to see how this turns out.

Think of it as the EULA being the judge, but Badspot being the police.  The judge cannot arrest the offenders, but the police, as the executive force, can.  This is in-part what's so unappealing about YouTube's policy on copyright– it is all determined and executed with one electronic system.

Though, Badspot is not one for double standards, as far as I've seen.

Again, not defending or attacking Cca, just bringing points to the table.

Fair points but if Badspot is the police, he can turn a blind eye to the crime but the crime is still a crime nonetheless.

50

Drama / Re: Cca possibly using BLHack.dll

« on: April 05, 2014, 01:14:46 PM »

I can't defend myself from that stand point. I'll give you that too.

Thanks for being respectful about the situation.

51

Drama / Re: Cca possibly using BLHack.dll

« on: April 05, 2014, 01:07:40 PM »

I am trying to argue the point that I should be pardoned from this because I was not using it in a malicious way.

The tool itself is illegal. The fact that you didn't use it in a malicious way doesn't excuse you from the fact that you had an illegal tool to begin with. In my country, it is illegal to own guns. If I got a gun and didn't use it for malicious purposes, I'd still get my ass kicked for having a gun to begin with.

52

Drama / Re: Cca possibly using BLHack.dll

« on: April 05, 2014, 12:56:21 PM »

"You drive a car, and I don't. Therefore I don't want you driving around because you might hit me." ~ Zeblote

Cars aren't illegal, hacks are.

53

Drama / Re: Cca possibly using BLHack.dll

« on: April 05, 2014, 10:51:35 AM »

I am banned from all of Tezuni's servers. That's impossible.

Tezuni isn't the only person who has hosted a slope ctf server within the last few months.

54

Drama / Re: Cca possibly using BLHack.dll

« on: April 05, 2014, 07:41:40 AM »

cca may own a gun, and it may have been designed to shoot people, but he isn't shooting people, and if he was we would find out. he's just . . . taking it to a gun range, to have some fun, i guess.

Except it isn't illegal to have a gun.

55

Off Topic / Re: The illuminati is among us.

« on: April 01, 2014, 11:34:24 AM »

The illuminati doesn't exist. Don't question the system.

56

Off Topic / Re: What would you do during the Purge?

« on: March 30, 2014, 02:38:21 PM »

I'd fortify my mansion and let in random black guys who are screaming on the streets.

57

Off Topic / Re: Just when you thought people couldn't get any more sensitive...

« on: March 15, 2014, 10:00:03 PM »

There should be an equal amount of males and females in literature so girls will not feel left out.

How would that be enforced? Putting requirements on what authors can write wouldn't go down well.

58

Off Topic / Re: What would you do if you had a lot of spare time.

« on: March 15, 2014, 08:27:46 PM »

If I had lots of spare time, I'd create a thread about it.

59

Off Topic / Just when you thought people couldn't get any more sensitive...

« on: March 10, 2014, 04:46:05 PM »

http://banbossy.com/
No words can describe...

60

Off Topic / Re: What the forget am I supposed to do here (math)

« on: March 01, 2014, 10:03:58 AM »

a = 1st roll score
b = 2nd roll score
c = 3rd roll score
d = 4th roll score
e = 5th roll score

From the question, it is known that

b = a + 5
c = b - 6
d = c + 11
e = d - 8

Now, each score should be shown in terms of a, so

c = b - 6 = (a+5) - 6 = a - 1
d = c + 11 = (a-1) + 11 = a + 10
e = d - 8 = (a+10) - 8 = a + 2

Now we can obtain a formula for the total score.

a + b + c + d + e = total score = a + (a+5) + (a-1) + (a+10) + (a+2) = 5a + 16

Now, to find a suitable value of a, create a list of numbers from 1-36 (minimum score is 1 and maximum is 36) and remove impossible numbers. For example, 7 cannot be equal to a because no two whole numbers from 1-6 can multiply together to get 7.

Since c  = a - 1 and c must be greater than or equal to 1 (since the minimum score is 1), a must be greater than 1

1 2   3   4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18 19  20 21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30 31  32  33  34  35  36

Now just go through the remaining numbers and see if any of them fit the conditions previously stated.

a = 2
b =

...

a = 9 - Valid
b = a + 5 = 14 - impossible number

a = 10   - Valid
b = a + 5 = 15  - Valid
c = b - 6 = 9 - Valid
d = c + 11 = 20 - Valid
e = d - 8 = 12 - Valid

Since I assume this problem is designed to give one solution only, a = 10.

So the the total score is 10 + 15 + 9 + 20 + 12 = 66.