Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Since all position is relative to other points in space, this is irrelevant.
If earth wasn't in this exact spot, if it was even a relatively small distance from where it was now, it wouldn't be able to sustain life. There are so many factors involved in creating a life-sustaining planet such as ours that it is a statistical impossibility to happen like you describe.
Oh that.
If time is infinite, then distance between particles tends to the infinite, according to the expansion concept.
So, take a time considerably before that limit where the particles were still huge distances apart, but it had not reached infinity yet, and there simply wouldn't be anything close enough to react.
There would be a time where the particles would have to double back to get back to the spot where Earth was and try and make it. That is impossible unless they hit other particles, which is impossible as they all would have vectors of (even slightly) different direction.
You can cap the time, yet the Earth would not have to be made in the finite time you set to try and complete the infinite number of events until you reached one that resulted in the creation of the Earth.
This all assumes that you roll huge amounts of poor scores on dice with billions of sides and don't create the Earth when it was made.
That made no sense.
Infinite by definition means unending, also
"Though, who says it's a limited amount of time? Aside from duck. (That isn't rhetorical.)
Just for clarification; "it" is "the amount of time the earth had to be created.""
Judgement day.
So, you are going to just go back and forth and back and forth on this? Are you going with the guess that we had an infinite amount of time or are you going with the guess we had a limited amount of time? Or will you give it up and go with the guess that says the earth was made in 7 days?
Exactly.
If time is infinite, then distance tends to the infinite.
Also, quote your question, please.
You should say the same for yourself prick
If you believe that the universe is ever-expanding, then it doesn't. Eventually all particles would be tending towards a limit of infinity in terms of distance from each other.
Though, who says it's a limited amount of time? Aside from duck. (That isn't rhetorical.)
Yes you did admit it.
You admitted it.
But seriously, it cannot be infinite as we are on Earth right now, and so it was made, so its 'construction time' was finite.
When I think about it, why not have 2 of these topics
Well, so the probability of picking one in an infinite number of events, in a limited time is even less. :/
I really hated that sort of probability.
I WASN'T DONE.
>:O
So you just admitted it took less time than its age, which was implied. Regardless, the probability of life being generated in such an automatic way is so infinitesimally small it is ridiculous to choose over something else.
