1246
Modification Help / Re: animated paint
« on: December 10, 2007, 05:37:16 PM »
He has the source code for the entire engine, which he modifies and compiles as necessary.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
1247
Modification Help / Re: Letting a bot get in a car...
« on: December 10, 2007, 05:34:52 PM »
I think it's a "wtf?" b/c the code post had almost nothing to do with the discussion. And, the
Code: [Select]
1248
General Discussion / Re: Looks like v9's gonna be a goodun.
« on: December 10, 2007, 05:14:24 PM »
If it automatically detects .cs files for execution, that would seem to defeat the purpose of .zips.
1249
Modification Help / Re: animated paint
« on: December 10, 2007, 04:52:50 PM »
Yes, and for the animated ones like rainbow / undulo, etc., they require engine changes.
1250
General Discussion / Re: Looks like v9's gonna be a goodun.
« on: December 10, 2007, 03:35:11 PM »
I'm curious about this as well, will .cs files in the Add-Ons directory still be detected for execution, or just .zips?
1251
General Discussion / Re: Looks like v9's gonna be a goodun.
« on: December 10, 2007, 12:11:20 PM »
What about them? V9 is .zip only. Shut your pie hole.
1252
General Discussion / Re: Looks like v9's gonna be a goodun.
« on: December 10, 2007, 11:53:44 AM »
Well, the Badspot already has the $20 bucks, so there's no incentive there, and the people who actually care enough to contribute are already doing it.
1253
General Discussion / Re: Looks like v9's gonna be a goodun.
« on: December 10, 2007, 11:39:20 AM »I'll be sure to port everything in the add-ons forums that is not already ported, should this occur.
And how will it stop the ice creamy add-ons? All that needs to be done is put them in a .zip, and odds are they'll be a tutorial on this on the forums soon, should this come to pass.
I'm anticipating a laziness factor here.
How's that relevant to the argument of .cs vs .zip; does RTB2 require that all add-ons be forced into .zips? The community has said that it already works, they just need to make changes when v9 comes out in order to retain compatability.
I'm pretty sure the release version will require .zips, since V9 requires zips.
True. It'll just mean you have to re-zip everything every 30 seconds when making mods. Not too much of a problem, it'll just be quite annoying after the first 200 times, that's the only thing. No more alt+s, now you'll have to actually open the folder and drag+drop... every... single... time. Gotta love pointless steps.
That's why you make a .zip template for your Add-Ons that you can use over and over. It's really not that bad. The benefits of this system FAR outweigh any costs.
1254
General Discussion / Re: Looks like v9's gonna be a goodun.
« on: December 10, 2007, 10:24:21 AM »
NO...NO...NO. Allowing the old-style, willy-nilly, throw-stuff-anywhere style of Add-Ons would TOTALLY defeat the purpose of .zips. Requiring .zips might even prevent some older, stuffty Add-Ons from making it to V9. In fact, I recommend that people NOT port stuffty Add-Ons to V9.
In addition, the use of RTB2 to manage, download, update, and rate Add-Ons will a HUGE benefit to the community.
Besides, it won't be THAT much work to convert, and it'll save you the trouble of other servers downloading stuff into Add-Ons/Add-Ons and base/base, etc.
In addition, the use of RTB2 to manage, download, update, and rate Add-Ons will a HUGE benefit to the community.
Besides, it won't be THAT much work to convert, and it'll save you the trouble of other servers downloading stuff into Add-Ons/Add-Ons and base/base, etc.
1255
Suggestions & Requests / Re: Duplicator saver
« on: December 10, 2007, 10:13:04 AM »
I think the name TITO should have been a dead giveaway.
1257
Gallery / Re: edge of slate
« on: December 09, 2007, 11:26:31 PM »
People keep whoring out my image for kicks, lol. I'm actually standing on the edge of Slate. The wall of bricks was build 1 or 2 bricks back from the edge.
1258
Modification Help / Re: Letting a bot get in a car...
« on: December 09, 2007, 08:07:27 PM »
Lol wtf. That isn't a quote...and hovervehicle? If you're talking about the magic carpet, it's a FlyingVehicle.
1259
Modification Help / Re: Letting a bot get in a car...
« on: December 09, 2007, 07:15:23 PM »
WheeledVehicle, FlyingVehicle, FlyingWheeledVehicle
1260
Modification Help / Re: Command, delay, command
« on: December 09, 2007, 07:14:34 PM »
Well, just say milliseconds. Ticks for things like triggers can be defined, say, to 100 milliseconds.