6151
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
6152
Off Topic / Re: Plornt is dead! D:
« on: May 22, 2010, 04:02:12 PM »Stop assuming that he went on vacation damnit! He's dead! Only three year old kids believe that "He went for a long trip" crap! YOU CAN'T FOOL ME! D:I killed him. :I
6153
Drama / Re: dkamm65 ban
« on: May 22, 2010, 03:12:15 PM »What was the point I didn't believe in the first place? I just want to see what you mean.That people with many posts should be banned. You literally stated that on accident, but you implied differently. However, you still used that plank for...whatever reason you had to continue in the first place.
In other words, you kept using post count in your argument, when you were really talking about the post contents.
6154
Off Topic / Re: Forum game: High school
« on: May 22, 2010, 03:09:37 PM »
(December 21, 2012: 6:45:15 A.M.) Bill has a sudden flashback to that day......
6155
General Discussion / Re: How did you discoverd blockland?
« on: May 22, 2010, 03:08:31 PM »
I played RTB. c:
6156
Drama / Re: dkamm65 ban
« on: May 22, 2010, 03:04:29 PM »
K then. Investigative-hippy time.
Then, he elaborated. >.>
His elaboration brought up the literal meaning of his initial post, which I don't think he really believed, he just didn't say "I meant". Unless he did, and Kev just ignored him:
How I see it, Grumpy was originally talking about those whom don't contribute, and stated those who post a lot do not contribute. I think, however, he was implying those whom post a lot of useless, rude things should be banned. However Kev read it differently.
Basically, Grumpy [may have] worded his initial post ("Also thank god. If only the other people that post a bunch were all banned for a week I wonder what would happen.") poorly, leading Kev to misunderstand, then leading Grumpy to then prove a point which he never really believed in the first place.
Or I could be totally wrong.
Also thank god. If only the other people that post a bunch were all banned for a week I wonder what would happen.Alright, an opinion.
Dumbasses like you would ruin the forumsRandom. :o
That doesn't even make senseHe could have left, but alright, not really a fight.
Provoking on Kev's part.
Posting my opinion makes me a dumbass. Saying someone that is noncontributive to the forum should be banned makes me a dumbass. Yes that makes sense.Providing reasoning
People that post a bunch are non contributive?Semantic - THIS is where it started. Kev looked into the post thinking Grumpy felt that everyone over a certain limit should be banned. While Grumpy stated exactly this, it isn't difficult to understand that he meant people who don't contribute should be banned.
Then, he elaborated. >.>
His elaboration brought up the literal meaning of his initial post, which I don't think he really believed, he just didn't say "I meant". Unless he did, and Kev just ignored him:
I find contributing to have a positive connotation. Also the forum is called the BLOCKLAND forums, you are ment to contribute to Blockland. I agree that off topic is the most active section so you almost always have the most posts their but, Dkamn has under 50 posts that are in the blockland section of the forum. Also that post was incredibly rude and stupid.
How I see it, Grumpy was originally talking about those whom don't contribute, and stated those who post a lot do not contribute. I think, however, he was implying those whom post a lot of useless, rude things should be banned. However Kev read it differently.
Basically, Grumpy [may have] worded his initial post ("Also thank god. If only the other people that post a bunch were all banned for a week I wonder what would happen.") poorly, leading Kev to misunderstand, then leading Grumpy to then prove a point which he never really believed in the first place.
Or I could be totally wrong.
6158
Drama / Re: dkamm65 ban
« on: May 22, 2010, 02:40:11 PM »On Grumpy's partAnd you carried it on. :o
6159
Drama / Re: dkamm65 ban
« on: May 22, 2010, 02:39:13 PM »
This is all just one big misunderstanding.
6165
Off Topic / Re: Countries
« on: May 22, 2010, 02:28:24 PM »Italy and Japan.I never knew they were in New York... :o