Messages

1546

Off Topic / Re: Summer Break

« on: May 13, 2015, 09:11:09 PM »

Well I'm pretty much on summer break now. I had precalculus and English/Comp 1 finals today. Some classes finished a while ago, plus I get exemptions on my two finals tomorrow due to good attendance and grades. So I pretty much just have to go to school tomorrow, get babysat in the cafeteria for four hours, and then leave. Sucks but it's the way my handicapped school works. After that, I never have to attend high school ever again.

Graduation ceremony is this Saturday. Is anyone else on summer yet?

next month :(

1547

Off Topic / Re: Letter from Ex-Waffen SS member to Spielberg referencing Saving Private Ryan.

« on: May 13, 2015, 08:46:46 PM »

You said that the first reason was a lie. I assumed you meant that all German soldiers were concerned with what race/religion the enemy was.

I didn't say all, what I mean is that a great deal of German soldiers were vehemently tribal, or were, at the very least, indoctrinated by national socialist tribal policy. For example, for the official order Treatment of offences committed by members of the military, two things are mentioned

For cruelties committed by members of the military and their retinue against enemy civilians, there is no [threat of] prosecution; the same holds true if the offense is simultaneously a military crime or offense.

that is literally a carte-blanche to do whatever you want to the civilian population, no prosecution for war-crimes, no court-martial

In the assessment of such acts, in each proceeding, it must be taken into consideration the collapse in 1918, the later period of suffering of the German nation and the battle against National Socialism with countless sacrifices of blood were crucial to reduce Bolshevism’s influence and that no German has forgotten this.

oh hey, look, in this military order to the wehrmact there is a definite reference to losing the first world war, and a political slant was introduced.

additional, general field marshall von reichenau order his troops (the entire sixth army) that

...The most important objective of this campaign against the Jewish-Bolshevik system is the complete destruction of its sources of power and the extermination of the Asiatic influence in European civilization. ... In this eastern theatre, the soldier is not only a man fighting in accordance with the rules of the art of war, but also the ruthless standard bearer of a national conception. ... For this reason the soldier must learn fully to appreciate the necessity for the severe but just retribution that must be meted out to the subhuman species of Jewry. ...

that seems very... tribal and anti-semitic, especially coming from a man who was practically second to Riddler in the chain of command at the time. remember, this was a very popular general who commanded the respect of his men. if his men respected and emulated him, perhaps they might've picked up a little of what he thought.

citations:
http://users.clas.ufl.edu/ggiles/barbaros.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severity_Order

1548

Off Topic / Re: Letter from Ex-Waffen SS member to Spielberg referencing Saving Private Ryan.

« on: May 13, 2015, 08:29:32 PM »

Having an opposing viewpoint is not always a bias. I would like you to explain to me, a German, how all German soldiers were automatically tribal and anti-Jewish simply because they fought for their country. Remember not necessarily the national socialist agenda, but their country. The fact that you don't know why he mentioned the organizations almost proves your were not actually reading it. Go back and read the surrounding text. He said that the Jewish organizations of today are basically exaggerating their role in WWII. I agree that he could have worded that better, but I imagine that he was pretty pissed at the guy. He was saying that since many modern Jews harshly resent the national socialists, who were not all tribal, that he wanted to connect them to the modern Skinheads movement.

simple










i never said all german soldiers were automatically tribal and anti-jewish. strawman harder.

1549

Off Topic / Re: Letter from Ex-Waffen SS member to Spielberg referencing Saving Private Ryan.

« on: May 13, 2015, 08:21:20 PM »

I don't see what's wrong with those quotes, except the last one was maybe a little harsh.

because it's as blatantly biased as forget, mentioning blatant lies (the first one), the second one mentions jewish organizations for... what reason exactly? and the last one is just awful. i don't see how anybody could trust a source that's so blatantly biased.

1550

Off Topic / Re: Letter from Ex-Waffen SS member to Spielberg referencing Saving Private Ryan.

« on: May 13, 2015, 08:18:08 PM »

You don’t seem to know that for the average German soldier of World War II, of whatever unit, the race, color or “religion” of the enemy didn’t matter at all. He didn’t know and he didn’t care.

And you know the answer. In fact, you generated exactly the opposite effect of what you had intended. Your use of that scene makes a lie out of the claim now put forth by Jewish organizations that during World War II Jews volunteered for service in numbers greater than their percentage of the general population, and that their blood sacrifice was (therefore) higher also.

Or else, your Jewishness came to the fore, and you wanted to draw a direct line back from today’s skinheads to the Waffen-SS and other German soldiers of the Third Reich.

what a loving cunt. if this guy is actually a ex-waffen ss member (which i doubt he is) he's a through and through stuff-eater.

1551

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 13, 2015, 05:33:44 PM »

To you it is, visit your local welfare office if you live in a large metro city and you will get the picture.

It's not the corporations mooching off of the government, it is the little guy mooching off. I don't blame the big corporations for evading taxes once in a blue moon, without business, we have nothing! Unions should be completely abolished, and the workers should be put into the hands of the employer solely without the noses of the unions. Power to the corporations and big businesses! It's the big man who created this nation, not the little blue collar worker!

did you seriously loving edit that entire diatribe out?

1552

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 13, 2015, 04:28:32 PM »

When the majority of the impoverished spend their money on sneakers and new phones, that's when you draw the line and realize the extent of welfare abuse nationwide.

[citation needed]

1553

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 12, 2015, 11:17:28 PM »

I kinda just meant this to be humorous, guys.

But if you wanna do this, then let's go. You guys really don't realize how much many first world women like to spend money? And who is it that lets them use the money they earned? Husbands, typically. Don't act like it's such a far-fetched idea.

nah, it's just how you implied that conspicuous consumption is somehow 1) exclusive to women and 2) how handicapped you are in generalizing half of the world's population because you had some one-sided experiences in the past.

I know the situation is kind of dumb.
But the point is that the holocaust is a factor that could of prevented it from happening.

...in what way? the major thing the holocaust did (aside from kill millions of innocent people) was galvanize the foundation of israel. if there was no holocaust israel wouldn't have formed right after ww2.

1554

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 12, 2015, 11:13:30 PM »

It's still possible for that to happen. Something like the holocaust not happening would change more things than you can imagine. There might be an alternate universe where that's the case and is caused solely by the lack of holocausting.

that's the most handicapped thing i've heard today

there was no reason for jews to radicalize before the holocaust, if anything the holocaust caused more radical jewish sects to arise.

that's aside the point though.

1555

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 12, 2015, 11:08:10 PM »

it's not about hypothesizing what didn't happen, it's about understanding what DID happen and using that to deal with the situation at hand.

1556

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 12, 2015, 10:59:24 PM »

ultimately

if we're talking about "200 billion years later, the sun engulfs the earth" then yeah, ultimately.

if you're too dense to realize how the war in the middle east has affected american life then there's no point in arguing with you anymore.

1557

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 12, 2015, 10:51:50 PM »

I'm not rejecting it, I'm saying that ultimately things would be almost as they are now.

... so the world and america would be the same if israel had never formed and neo-radical islam hadn't surfaced in the cataclysmic way it did.

1558

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 12, 2015, 10:47:12 PM »

Men make the money, women spend it. Women just stockpile all their cash and retire

you have a really forgeted up world view that isn't grounded anywhere in reality.

1559

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 12, 2015, 10:43:57 PM »

If women are gonna spend all the money, we should at least get a little recognition

what are you even saying lol

1560

Off Topic / Re: Americans choose Harriet Tubman to be on the $20 bill

« on: May 12, 2015, 10:24:24 PM »

the only "wall of text" I ignored was ipquarx reiterating his point which I already mentioned I was referring to how life would pretty much be completely the same. butterfly effect all you want. it's not relevant.

"it ain't so because i SAY IT AIN'T SO."