2791
Off Topic / Re: leafy responds to dramalert
« on: July 09, 2016, 08:30:29 PM »ugh he put doom gameplay i cant watch it now since i dont want any spoilersGod forbid you spoil the complex plot that exists within Doom.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2792
Off Topic / Re: Petition to recognize BLM as terrorists.
« on: July 09, 2016, 08:25:58 PM »
Yea, it is a few. Annoying Orange supporters are far more violent than BLM. BLM is not a terroristic organization.
From Huffington Post:
From Huffington Post:
Quote
No one who claims to speak for the Black Lives Matter movement has promoted violence as a means to achieve an end. The message the movement spreads has nothing to do with inflicting violence or pain against police officers — or anyone else, for that matter. It is simply a call to end the police brutality and misconduct that disproportionately take a toll on black bodies
who gives a forget what its legally called dude or whatever you damn well know that it's become an organization/group and you're denying it for ???Okay, this should not be complicated. Something that is not an organization cannot be a terroristic organization.
2793
Off Topic / Re: Petition to recognize BLM as terrorists.
« on: July 09, 2016, 08:23:11 PM »
Okay, sorry, but that comparison was really weird. Maybe it wouldn't been quicker to follow it you didn't compare them to Al-Qaeda and rather an organization with a lot of violent supporters, like the NRA, or more recently, Britain First.
BLM is legally not an organization, however I think saying they are not an entity is slightly misleading.
BLM is legally not an organization, however I think saying they are not an entity is slightly misleading.
2794
Off Topic / Re: Petition to recognize BLM as terrorists.
« on: July 09, 2016, 08:17:41 PM »What if Al qaeda was an organization that made party plans to celebrate people's birthday. They're a party service and they provide clowns n entertainment and stuff. What if one day they planned a party at the world trade center but 9 of their 10,000 members decided to fly a plane into it. Would they be a terrorist organization, even though they wouldn't have anything to do with the plane hijacking?Are you implying that the majority of BLM supporters are terrorists? Are you suggesting their leaders organize terroristic attacks? Al-Queda is a terrorist group because as an organization it plans and executes terroristic attacks. One of the 9/11 hijackers was a United Airlines Pilot. Should we label United Airlines as a terrorist organization, since that man personally killed hundreds of people, far more than BLM ever could?
Theres a clear difference between majority and minority. Everyone here understands it but some are too stubborn to even take it into consideration.
i can't edit the picture of that face any closer
my personal least favorite users are probably akio and cc. they both seem like total richards imo. they both give me massive taboo vibes in which they get really too angry when someone doesn't agree with them and start making personal insults against those they disagree with,While personal insults don't invalidate an argument--you didn't even make an argument. You're just pathetic.
To be fair we only hear about the protests that go south. They're have been plenty of BLM protests that have started and ended peacefully.BLM is an starfish organization that attempts to shut down opposing speech. And trying to shut them down makes you just as bad.
afaik nope. Those 9 people would be tried separately.
edit: Decided to clarify something real quick, when I said "You" I didn't literally mean you, e-maxx. I don't think you support the petition, I'm just saying it of people who do.
But they do it anywayAs Ipquarx said--who is "they"? Black people? I don't think even close to a majority of African American looters/shooters are affiliated with BLM, and acting as though they are seems rather tribal. BLM are starfishs, not terrorists. Just like the NRA.
how can you be part of a movement? Blm is not an organization or entityIt's lightly organized, with leaders and designated protests.
2795
Off Topic / Re: Petition to recognize BLM as terrorists.
« on: July 09, 2016, 07:44:11 PM »How dumb are you?I'm smart enough to know what a terrorist organization is, unlike you, apparently.
its pretty obvious that they know.This thread proves otherwise.
BLM does not support looting or violence.
I mean it's not like we loot stores or shoot cops or anything
2796
Off Topic / Re: Petition to recognize BLM as terrorists.
« on: July 09, 2016, 06:54:19 PM »
Yea. BLM is obviously not a terrorist organization. While we're at it, why not shut down the NRA as well? A lot of gun nuts shoot people--so let's punish the organization that doesn't endorse their actions in any way!
2797
Games / Re: No Man's Sky releases in 1 month.
« on: July 09, 2016, 06:46:49 PM »I completely agree with this. It looked cool at first, but after seeing gameplay and videos it just seems like it does not have enough things to do.Yea, /r/nomansskythegame is full of nuts who will downvote any opinions like mine. The top post is literally some dude saying that the game will have infinite replay value and he will play for thousands of hours because he still sometimes plays a DOS game released in 1996 lol
Also, the subreddit for this game (/r/nomansskythegame) is awful. the people in it are loving insane and they say that they're going to be playing it until they die.
l4d and memewatch has it down right: sell at 30 or less and make sure your multiplayer is clean afwhat are you talking about overwatch isnt 30 or less
2798
Off Topic / Re: Petition to recognize BLM as terrorists.
« on: July 09, 2016, 06:41:23 PM »
Yea, let's shut down a group because we don't agree with what they say. We're so much better than BLM now!
2799
Off Topic / Re: leafy responds to dramalert
« on: July 09, 2016, 06:38:37 PM »
leafy reminds me of a less popular youtuber named "Atheism Is Unstoppable" except somehow more annoying. the link between them is that both are ultra-dismissive and irritating as hell, except AIU speaks in a slow deep voice. let me do an AIU immitation vs a Leafy immitation:
(Slowly) "Hah, yeah, keep whining you betamale cuck. The regressive is real. HAH! Hah. It's just too easy. It's too easy. The jokes write themselves, hah."
(Quickly) "I mean I don't know if I really need to keep going off on you right now because I'm sure everyone is convinced by this point that you're just a sad manchild that nobody loves and nobody ever will."
They're both idiots. At least Keemstar tends to address people's claims rather than just dismissing them.
(Slowly) "Hah, yeah, keep whining you betamale cuck. The regressive is real. HAH! Hah. It's just too easy. It's too easy. The jokes write themselves, hah."
(Quickly) "I mean I don't know if I really need to keep going off on you right now because I'm sure everyone is convinced by this point that you're just a sad manchild that nobody loves and nobody ever will."
They're both idiots. At least Keemstar tends to address people's claims rather than just dismissing them.
2801
Off Topic / Re: How to get popular
« on: July 09, 2016, 06:59:09 AM »
i mean objectively i think BLF's least controversial people--as in, those with the fewest numbers of dissidants--would probably be Jairo, Swollow, Nonnel(?), Swholli(?), and and Lego Lad. maybe a few others. I think popularity is on a personal index. I personally like Sir Dooble, IkeTheGeneric, Rally, and Taya because even though they don't necessarily agree with me they are all pretty active and logical in the politics/debates threads. except being like that is inherently polarizing because a lot of users can't seem to reason with someone who disagrees with them politically.
the reason I picked those users as the most "popular" i think is because they all seem fairly political neutral and make a lot of large or contributing topics (in Swollow's case, mods) so they don't give people much to disagree with.
my personal least favorite users are probably akio and cc. they both seem like total richards imo. they both give me massive taboo vibes in which they get really too angry when someone doesn't agree with them and start making personal insults against those disagree with, a common trait among the Lawful Evil on the BLF Alignment Chart:
meanwhile the popular usually sit around the rebel (one right of center) moral area (one up from center), perhaps with Jairo being an exception at lawful or social good.
edit: oh and I like Planr but it's for the totally opposite reason. Like I can't really disagree with anything he says even though it's totally wrong because his reasoning for it is usually "THE BIBLE" or "JESUS" and that's kinda hilarious.
edit 2: fun fact, the Chaotic Evil region was the hardest to fill out because most users that fit it get banned before they can do anything noteworthy.
the reason I picked those users as the most "popular" i think is because they all seem fairly political neutral and make a lot of large or contributing topics (in Swollow's case, mods) so they don't give people much to disagree with.
my personal least favorite users are probably akio and cc. they both seem like total richards imo. they both give me massive taboo vibes in which they get really too angry when someone doesn't agree with them and start making personal insults against those disagree with, a common trait among the Lawful Evil on the BLF Alignment Chart:
meanwhile the popular usually sit around the rebel (one right of center) moral area (one up from center), perhaps with Jairo being an exception at lawful or social good.
edit: oh and I like Planr but it's for the totally opposite reason. Like I can't really disagree with anything he says even though it's totally wrong because his reasoning for it is usually "THE BIBLE" or "JESUS" and that's kinda hilarious.
edit 2: fun fact, the Chaotic Evil region was the hardest to fill out because most users that fit it get banned before they can do anything noteworthy.
2802
Drama / Re: Flowey Alt Check
« on: July 09, 2016, 06:47:48 AM »
the trick to being a successful alt: assume someone elses identity. just wait till they get banned and "come back on your alt account lol"
a lot of people think i used to be this "zealot" guy. suckers
a lot of people think i used to be this "zealot" guy. suckers
2803
Off Topic / Re: How to get popular
« on: July 09, 2016, 06:41:56 AM »
just do everything lord tony does
2804
Off Topic / Re: [NEWS]War zone in Dallas, 11 cops shot during protest, 5 dead. suspects escaped
« on: July 09, 2016, 04:47:24 AM »
^ the UN would not be investigating via labeled armored trucks
i believe they were being dispatched to military bases around the US for use abroad. it's a pretty standard operation, nothing to do with economic collapse lol
i believe they were being dispatched to military bases around the US for use abroad. it's a pretty standard operation, nothing to do with economic collapse lol
2805
Off Topic / Re: [NEWS]War zone in Dallas, 11 cops shot during protest, 5 dead. suspects escaped
« on: July 09, 2016, 03:44:43 AM »
while I certainly don't agree with rally i think a lot of the responses were strawmanning him. he said that he wanted the police to be more militarized, not necessarily more aggressive and/or oppressive, and certainly not shooting into protests to shut them down. while the 10k for 1 comparison was a little sociopathical I don't think he was fully serious in it.
now, I personally think the militarization of the police needs to match the militarization of the people. since people can carry guns, the police should too, so I think our system is currently adequate. however I believe that the role of police officer is the role of a public servant--not just a career. so in taking that role you should accept the risks and also accept that you will not be protected above other citizens. now, I do think we need to re-train our officers to be less violent and trigger-happy, perhaps having them wield tazers immediately rather than their firearms. also, it should be mandated that all officers wear body-cams, which film at all times, so that we may protect both the citizens from abusive officers and the officers from lying civilians. anyone who opposes body cam use is an idiot
now, I personally think the militarization of the police needs to match the militarization of the people. since people can carry guns, the police should too, so I think our system is currently adequate. however I believe that the role of police officer is the role of a public servant--not just a career. so in taking that role you should accept the risks and also accept that you will not be protected above other citizens. now, I do think we need to re-train our officers to be less violent and trigger-happy, perhaps having them wield tazers immediately rather than their firearms. also, it should be mandated that all officers wear body-cams, which film at all times, so that we may protect both the citizens from abusive officers and the officers from lying civilians. anyone who opposes body cam use is an idiot