1
Forum Games / Re: European Tribe Role Play Post-Rome Cera 5th Century -OP Is Not Playing-
« on: February 06, 2016, 10:48:57 PM »
I realized since I don't know how to play this I was going to try and just set one of these up instead.
what
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I realized since I don't know how to play this I was going to try and just set one of these up instead.
TL;DR Nizza and tyi feel that they are entitled to success without intensive work and get disappointed and blame the game and other players.
I'm going to ask kindly for your silence and to stop harassing players. I don't want to have to impose a ban if I don't have to, however, it looks like things are resolved. That being said, even Agent puts up with harder stuff than you two did and he's still willing to improve himself despite losses. I don't think he's anywhere close to experienced, but I think that quality at least deserves recognition.
Updates are coming. Sorry for the delay.
*sigh* I don't have time to deal with this right now.
I have an essay due in an hour, I'll catch up afterwards.
I actually wasn't friends or even thought of maxwell when I made Nyn. also don't complain you got some land from that too ;)
okay okay, I'm sorry I called you butthurt.
I never claimed to want to help new players, and I never wanted to join the war to my east until I realized Conservatia was about to join. The war then was between a brand new nation with an older but smaller nation, versus a strategically located state with a solid population, high quality weapons and a large military - hardly the puppy kicking you claim. I never mocked any nations for helping Sunyong, and I would invite you to find the post where I did.
I don't understand why you are having problems with nations that have joined first having advantages in size - that is the benefit to starting early, is it not? But I suppose it matters not if you're leaving.
I think and hope that the shadowy overlords of Sunyong and Conservatia, blazerblock2 and grunterdb1951, understand none of this is personal nor is it due to a problem I have OOC, as I don't have one. It's simply the nature of nation RPs.
Seriously, dude?
Alright, so yes, they certainly expanded a bit fast. And Waru was dismissing your points, but he's not entirely wrong here. You're essentially rage-quiting the RP because someone else expanded faster than you (note: all the land still available) and that "ruined the RP" how? Rather than whining about it until everyone is irritated with you, maybe you could have dealt with it in-character, as is the entire point of this game. Form a coalition of smaller nations to fight against the perceived oppressors! Expand eastward! Trade with other nations!
Come on, it's not like you can't do the same things they could.
I'm not Swat, but I'm voiding the land donation. Land donations are really just kind of cheap in general and it's a form of metagaming.
we had people leave and donate nation land a tad bit too much for my tastes now tbh
Anyone could have earned the same amount of arbitrary stars if they had expanded the same. It was supposed to be a helpful guide for players to judge their basic prestige and prosperity for reference purpose, not a richard comparing contest. I don't know why you're so unhappy about this - I expanded, I acquired trade, I grew my military and I conquered a prosperous region with another prosperous ally. The outcome would be the same whether or not CypherX and Kyrev had that spot or you did, if you took the same actions. Grabbing future tech is a different matter entirely and should be called out, and I would have been called out if I had done it too.
However, just for you, Swat is knocking down my stars one each for fairness. Does that satisfy you? Or would you like me to become your vassal so you may hold the reigns of power as you so desire?
butthurt
because its how the dice fell. kyrev was lucky that he showed the might of his military, made friends, and made an economy based on his iron/steel.
And the reason that a hermit could be able to win against unbelievable odds is due to winning from attrition, from simply turtling, or at the very least put a serious hurt on the enemy war machine.
What would be wrong would be a small hermit's army besting a major power's army in a line battle. Even with a deftly handled battle on the power's part, the enemy should eventually be at the very least forced to draw simply to attrition and failing morale due to the era and size difference. Obvious exceptions, such as extreme elite units versus militia, I'm not talking about, but when it is just line troops versus line troops the outcome should not be in question, for now anyways.
Yes, it's happening, but to be fair this did happen often historically. Great powers would be bitter rivals until a newcomer popped up, in which case they would all beat them up to keep them out of their special great-power club. The solution to this would be a coalition of the non-military-industrial-complex nations fighting a war against essentially the Axis. It's not an impossible fight so long as you get enough people on your side.
It's not really realistic to have everyone have equal power.
what are you talking about. he has multiple trade agreements, tech contracts, and has a buttload of land, along with a ton of allies and a vassal. i don't see how he wouldn't be a 5 star.
Fight fire with fire.