3661
Off Topic / Re: Philosophical Thread
« on: October 23, 2014, 12:28:35 AM »
"I'm a nice dude, with some nice dreams
See these ice cubes, see these Ice Creams?"
~Aristotle
See these ice cubes, see these Ice Creams?"
~Aristotle
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
thatsthejoke.jpegawfully suspicious joke if you ask me

Also I like to debate stuff, I don't necessary have to agree with my position. :)...
my mom actually believes this lolmaybe you are in a different situation, but i tried convincing my sister and i have gotten nothing but blown off completely.
how do i explain that this is bullstuff without her hand-waving me off
How do you define your own without a label? Also what is a panloveual and why do they want to forget pans?panloveual = biloveuals who make a point to include trans/nonbinary people. i think.
Jesus christ, can no one ask questions on the internet anymore? I want to understand, and since apparently you and Foxnight are experts I figured this was as good of a time as any to ask.
Aloveuality doesn't seem real. It seems like a cop out or something.:I
So, are you saying aloveuals don't feel attraction but they have love because it feels good? But then they don't desire what feels good?they can have love if they want, because it feels good. but then yes, they dont desire it. i mean i know i said it was simple but there's actually a lot of different forms it could take now that i think about it. it goes from love repulsed to people that regularly have love.
youre getting really defensive like hes attacking aloveual people and with that mentality that a person who is trying to discern the psychology behind aloveual behavior is "investigating as if hes gonna invalidate it" it seems really counter-productive
Aloveuality doesn't seem real.
I'm saying its a bad definition. :/
Ever? They don't experience loveual attraction ever? Or sometimes they do? Also its not a problem, I'm trying to understand.i mean it's simple to accept. like why you have to investigate that as if you're gonna invalidate it? but anyways, you can have love with someone without being loveually attracted to them. you know, feelsgoodman.jpg.
I'm saying its a bad definition. :/you don't have to be hungry to eat food and enjoy it
I don't understand how someone who identifies as a person who feels no loveual urges what so ever, could have love or decide to jack-off?
Also, idea just popped in my head, in what cases have there been aloveuals discriminated against?well, you. right now. saying that they aren't real.
Aloveuality doesn't seem real. It seems like a cop out or something.voluntarily copping out of love?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNsJ1DhqQ-salso if you havent watched that