Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
these are children's showswould that not make it worse to make fun of transgender people? children are impressionable and maybe a kid with dysphoria would start feeling stigmatized by their favorite show.
is this the understood definition of what an SJW is? i've always understood the idea basically as a socially radical person that likes to yell on the internetyou're good at explaining things better than me
regardless, i think kimon's point is that this is merely an archetype and real examples of that archetype are too rare to actually justify creating a collective of them, or rather, the apparent examples are far less intense than the archetype would suggest. i think it's more so a problem where the parameters for the group are so weirdly defined that it's kinda hard to use as a legitimate collection of individuals. it's a weird case where the group that's being described becomes loaded with all sorts of negative connotations that using it in rational discourse becomes really difficult and muddled. the problem is more so that the term "SJW" has come to be inherently dismissive and negative. it doesn't hold weight as a categorisation, it holds weight as a derogation. as a real-world example, think "communist" during the red scare. it was a label used to cause distrust and shoot down ideas rather than as a legitimate means of identification.
please elaborate kind sir
what point? is your point that it's ok to be an starfish to weaboos but not to anyone else? that popular animes are bad because of them? that weaboos are gross??people that regularly consume anime / hentai that special interestizes rape and child enthusiasm (there's a lot of them!) are stuff, and the fact that they are ruining the japanese animation industry is a cherry on top. people that consume anime are not bad people, but it becomes increasingly obvious that you are dealing with a weeaboo based on the shows they watch. (and how much they watch of it, sometimes)
if being a weaboo is a 'group', why is attempting to defend the dumbest things and promote basically anything that involves a gender that isn't male / female not a group?because weeaboos are easy to identify, and not thrown around loosely as a stuffty umbrella term for people you dont agree with in an argument. hell, half of the bad anime consumers identify themselves as weeaboos.
"I don't care about other people interest, except if its all things japanese!"that's a gross bastardization of what i said, i REALLY gotta ask you again if you actually read the post it was based on. that's a rhetorical question, because i know you didn't.
you know what other kind of person eats up stupid things, thinks extremely odd things are normal, and are a plague to society?this is a joke right? like you didnt actually miss the point that badly just to fit in an unfunny jab at a group that need i remind you, is not an actual group, you determined the parameters for being in it
sjw's
I think this should be more specific because fandom is a group of fans of everything, so as well as saying the internet cancer sucks you are also saying fans of sports or hobbies are also cancer which isn't the case because I don't see people who collect cars getting into arguments over the best hobby.yeah i guess so but again i just dont concern myself with whatever people do to enjoy themselves, with exceptions like weeaboo culture of course.
ever since they all started using it as a hugboxim gonna have to redirect you to the stuff i just got done writing about, just above you
Since when has any Tumblr user been an accurate representation of a entire fandom?yeah this also
the steven universe fandom is worse than weeaboosyou have no place to talk
B-BUT THA KIKSTARTOR >:OOOOwho are you? who asked you? leave my presence at once, you coward. your scoundrel. you absolute fool.
