Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rally

Pages: 1 ... 232 233 234 235 236 [237] 238 239 240 241 242 ... 534
3541
Games / Re: No Man's Sky ~ BIGGEST DISSAPOINTMENT OF 2016? (IN THE HOOD)
« on: August 30, 2016, 05:24:13 AM »
Look at this massive loving chunk of Nickle, I'm standing on a ledge it goes down even further off screen



Also: this was pretty interesting, I originally thought that some kind of structure might've glitched into a cave or something, but it actually just turned out to be this massive tunnel bored down into a mountain with a monolith at the bottom.



So you're not actually going to refute anything I said and instead opt to insult? So you're not actually going to refute anything I said and instead opt to insult? That's pleasant. I'm going to agree to disagree if you're going to take my opinion on a vidya game this personally.

What is there to "refute"? You were literally wrong. You haven't given any reason why No Man's Sky should be the singular only exception to the Steam refund policy since it's inception other than vague statements with absolutely no reasoning behind them. Like what the hell do you expect me to say to "two hours is not enough"? Yes it is? Go ahead and send this garbage:

Two hours = not enough time to figure out whether or not this particular game is good
Two hours = not enough time to know whether or not a lot of promised content is actually in the game
Two hours to your average joe is literally figuring out the control scheme and exploring the first planet for a little bit and is in no way indicative of the game's depth

to Steam, and see what they say. I'm legitimately curious as to how they're going to get around this logical masterpiece.

3542
Games / Re: No Man's Sky ~ BIGGEST DISSAPOINTMENT OF 2016? (IN THE HOOD)
« on: August 30, 2016, 04:51:19 AM »
If you disagree, then tough, the platform it's being sold on agrees with my sentiment.

It's funny because they loving don't



lol

Maybe you should send your garbage sentiment to Steam to see if they'll update their refund system to do every game on a case-by-case basis to determine whether or not you're going to need 30 minutes, 2 hours, 2 and a half hours, maybe 10 loving months to figure out whether or not the game is going to entertain them for the rest of their worthless life, or for your latest edit, to "deliver" on whatever your bullstuff interpretation of the "main selling point" is. The two hour policy has worked for every game without fail and just because Reddit had a collective hissy fit doesn't make No Man's Sky special.

3543
Games / Re: No Man's Sky ~ BIGGEST DISSAPOINTMENT OF 2016? (IN THE HOOD)
« on: August 30, 2016, 04:38:39 AM »
Did you "try it" for under two hours and then refund it?

Oh it doesn't? Wanna tell me how to properly enjoy the game? I had forgotten that the core experience of exploration games is to jump around the place like mad without trying to trot along at a moderate pace to fully soak in all the deets

What the forget even is this sentence? The refund system doesn't exist so you can play a game for whatever loving amount of time you want and then get rid of it when you find out you don't enjoy it. Before the refund system people had to go look up videos and research the game after it came out to see whether or not they were going to enjoy it. It exists so you can make a personal decision before you decide whether or not you want to keep it.

If you plan on being able to refund it, you go into it trying to determine the worth of the game. You don't just sit on your ass playing the loving game for 3 full days and suddenly send it back when it fails to entertain you for 380 loving hours

3544
Games / Re: No Man's Sky ~ BIGGEST DISSAPOINTMENT OF 2016? (IN THE HOOD)
« on: August 30, 2016, 04:32:41 AM »


Harr-de-harr, I was alluding more to the fact that the game boasts major replayability through many iterations of planets to explore, yet fails to deliver on any sort of draw beyond that. I like exploration, but usually as means of quantifiable accomplishment rather than doing for the sake of it being done. After three planets without any sort of content to really sink my teeth in, I olly-outied

It doesn't take two hours to visit 3 planets, lol. The refund system exists so you can get in-game for two hours and make a prediction based on two entire hours of game-play time. It doesn't exist so you can return a game that you didn't do any research on after playing it for several days

3545
Games / Re: No Man's Sky ~ BIGGEST DISSAPOINTMENT OF 2016? (IN THE HOOD)
« on: August 30, 2016, 04:15:33 AM »
You get 72 hours out of a game and you want to refund it because you didn't get 380? I have more than 380 hours on 2 out of the 242 games I own.

If you play any game for 2 hours you'll have an idea of whether or not you want to refund it. I fail to see how No Man's Sky is any exception to this rule.

3546
Games / Re: No Man's Sky ~ BIGGEST DISSAPOINTMENT OF 2016? (IN THE HOOD)
« on: August 30, 2016, 04:02:53 AM »
Which would be fine if you didn't have to keep farming to keep chilling.

I walked across the surface of an extreme cold planet, throughout storms, for about ~45 minutes before my life support hit 75%. Like the amount of titanium you get from killing one sentinel is enough to fill up 50% of your hazard protection.

When they suddenly sober from their hype-laden stupor and realize they spent 71 hours of their life doing forget-all in a game that's about as stimulating as a bowl of lukewarm tap water

If you accidentally play a game you don't enjoy for 3 full days because you're handicapped you still don't deserve a refund.

3547
Games / Re: No Man's Sky ~ BIGGEST DISSAPOINTMENT OF 2016? (IN THE HOOD)
« on: August 30, 2016, 03:49:54 AM »
No
60 loving bucks is allot of money spend on literal garbage

Yeah, "literal garbage" that kept you invested for 28 hours.

the entire point of the 2 hour playtime was if the game simply couldnt run on your computer, you would know in 2 hours.
this game is being refunded because its a fraud. playtime is irrelevant.

In what universe would it take someone 71 hours of playtime to suddenly realize the game is a fraud? I made an entire 33 episode youtube series on The Forest with my friend in 65 hours. If you played the game for more than two hours you do not deserve a refund. If you didn't like the ending or if the game failed to keep you entertained for your whatever arbitrary amount of time you have in your head you still don't deserve a refund.

3548
Games / Re: No Man's Sky ~ BIGGEST DISSAPOINTMENT OF 2016? (IN THE HOOD)
« on: August 29, 2016, 04:56:32 PM »
I've had at-least 5 people on my steam friends list tell me that I could refund the game "regardless of playtime". I'm sitting there thinking y'all know I have 71 hours on this game right lol?

3549
Games / Re: No Man's Sky ~ BIGGEST DISSAPOINTMENT OF 2016? (IN THE HOOD)
« on: August 29, 2016, 03:04:05 PM »


lol

3550
Add-Ons / Re: New Duplicator 1.4.4 | Super-Cut Beta
« on: August 29, 2016, 01:58:15 PM »
That should help with "de-spamming" sections of brick. Really revolutionary stuff you're doing here

3551
Off Topic / Re: at how many frames per second does the universe work
« on: August 29, 2016, 09:50:01 AM »
>2016
>not having an 18.5 quintillion yottahertz monitor

3552
Add-Ons / Re: New Duplicator 1.4.4 | Super-Cut Beta
« on: August 29, 2016, 09:08:06 AM »
To fill an area, make a box and say /fillbricks or /fb

oh forget yes

3553
Off Topic / Re: This forum is bad for our futures
« on: August 29, 2016, 08:34:41 AM »
I remember I linked my friend's clothing brand website here and he got a referral to the thread I linked it in, next day he asks me "Are you Rally on the Blockland Forums?" on facebook and I kinda gave him some shady as forget denial lol

3554
Off Topic / Re: procrastination is a sin and you're all going to hell
« on: August 29, 2016, 08:07:03 AM »
not a sin. don't believe catholic trickery

3555
Off Topic / Re: at how many frames per second does the universe work
« on: August 29, 2016, 07:40:44 AM »
I think that, on average, the average human can detect change in FPS up to 150fps. I think 240fps is considered the limit. I don't want to make any official statements because I know people get mad as forget about this stuff for no reason at all.

Pages: 1 ... 232 233 234 235 236 [237] 238 239 240 241 242 ... 534