1. rally you dont have to be such a richard to convey your point
I was trying to take on an investigative tone.
2. i don't understand what could have possibly gone wrong with slayer clarifying it was a joke. none of this would have happened. not even the argument would have happened. he 100% had the power to stop all of this, but he chose not to because he didnt feel like explaining something. its a bit frustrating.
Nothing would've gone wrong, but how the hell is it anyone else's responsibility to pick up after your delusional paranoia in their own thread? He wouldn't of had to 'explain himself' if you hadn't gone after him in the first place.
once again, the intention of that post, even though it was admittedly a confrontational tone, was to serve as a 'warning', like "dude if you're serious that's creepy", and generally if you call something creepy it means you're implying they shouldn't do it. and form my perspective making fun of my pokemon name looked like an uncomfortable attempt to dodge the subject, which worried me even more.
Have you ever considered that your 'perspective' might be skewed by some warped and incorrect paradigm of the world, bolstered by the fact that you were embarrassingly wrong in the end anyway? Nobody wants your 'warnings'. Very few people even want you on this forum, much less your advice on how to behave, because you have a track record of terrible behavior. You should probably keep that in mind next time you want to criticize someone else's behavior.
Reminder: the term "creepy" is an empty term which is only ever used as a vague method of insulting someone.