Messages

21616

Off Topic / Re: lets talk about moral quandries

« on: August 24, 2014, 01:20:55 PM »

For the second one, the wife is just as guilty as the madman if she knows the locations of the bombs but still won't tell.

no, the point is that you would torture the man's wife so that he'll tell you where they are

21617

Off Topic / Re: JQuery help - Coding Minesweeper

« on: August 24, 2014, 01:16:19 PM »

uhh
jquery isn't part of javascript by default...

you gotta add this above your script
<script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
or you can use whatever URL you want as long as it leads to a copy of the jquery library. but I suggest that one because it's on Google's CDN which means first of all it's fast, and secondly that it'll be in a lot of people's caches already

21618

Drama / Re: Emo Freak v5

« on: August 24, 2014, 12:25:45 PM »

like I said in my previous topic,seriously if you're that loving horny 24/7 go private message them instead of posting it

nah that won't work. he wants you guys to get all upset about it. which you do. so why would he stop

21619

Off Topic / Re: what is your name

« on: August 24, 2014, 12:22:52 PM »

BEST

"tiny purple unicorn. it flickers in and out of this plane of reality. it wears a cherry-themed outfit."
also "fairy ferret. it never blinks. its eyes are pitch black and cause those who look directly into them for too long to slowly grow older."

21620

Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here

« on: August 24, 2014, 12:12:45 PM »

too many special interestes

not enough special interestes!
gotta have more pawz

21621

Off Topic / Re: lets talk about moral quandries

« on: August 24, 2014, 11:58:57 AM »

Let New York City die anyway because it should be a lesson to them that they need to not let people plant bombs all around.

uh... what?
so do you think 9/11 was deserved? because they let terrorists fly planes into the buildings?

21622

Off Topic / Re: jeremy clarkson shouting "MOTHER forgetERS!!!" (ALS ICE BUCKET)

« on: August 24, 2014, 11:56:04 AM »

you can actually see the very moment when he realized what was going on

21623

Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here

« on: August 24, 2014, 11:54:35 AM »

that is not chub

Why is this stuff all backwards
It's one thing to say attraction with an adult that looks like a kid is creepy
But to say that attraction to kid that looks like an adult isnt? wtf

well, you're attracted to how they look

Morally i don't see any issue with it
But legally, it's still statutory rape

yeah, that's, like, exactly what I said

21624

Off Topic / Re: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here

« on: August 24, 2014, 11:21:17 AM »

So, what if i was attracted to a 13 year old that looked like an adult, hmm?
Would it still be creepy?

it wouldn't be creepy necessarily, but if you actually had love with them it would be morally wrong because they're 13. unless you're like 14 or 15 or also 13. in which case I don't really think there's an issue

also, if you weren't aware they were that young, it would be ok too. because that would mean in a way that they tricked you into having love with them. and the impressionability of young ones is the only real issue with doing it with a kid imo. their age alone isn't that big of a deal, it's just that they can't give any kind of reliable consent. but, obviously, if they made you think they were older then that would be on them rather than you
legally, you'd probably still be in serious trouble, though

yeah it's cute and all now but wait when it hits it's growth spurt

thats even better bc then you can have s*x with them

21625

Off Topic / Re: Apparently emojis work on BLF but you need a browser extension

« on: August 24, 2014, 01:30:08 AM »

😺 yes 😺

21626

General Discussion / Re: Blockland Merchandise

« on: August 24, 2014, 01:14:23 AM »

i would wear that

21627

Off Topic / Re: lets talk about moral quandries

« on: August 24, 2014, 01:05:05 AM »

Individual rights are above the wants of the majority.

did you specifically say wants on purpose? because if so, I agree. but if you also meant to include "needs" then I think it depends

21628

Off Topic / Re: ALS Ice Bucket chalange

« on: August 24, 2014, 12:59:31 AM »

Nah

good
pics

21629

Off Topic / Re: lets talk about moral quandries

« on: August 24, 2014, 12:59:02 AM »

how's about you discuss this "ignite the atmosphere and kill everyone" scenario at another time

why??? it's even still relevant to the thread

21630

Off Topic / Re: lets talk about moral quandries

« on: August 24, 2014, 12:55:53 AM »

earlier today he was arguing about something in the FMT and i wanted to say something but didn't

if you wanna say something to me. something real, like you think I'm acting like a jerk or something. don't say it on the forum, send me a message on steam instead. I'll be 100x more likely to listen and not be upset about it

you said that the area near NYC and up would get decimated
i won't be near new york

well that was a different situation. at some point it kinda forked off and now we're talking about project trinity and the risks associated with it, not the cloverfield thing

...didn't god kill tons of his own people for the errors of select few?

yeah idk. but that was like the old testament or something. the new testament god is supposed to be better I think
the point is that nobody really deserves to die. I'm not really gonna get into that too much cus of people like Riddler and stuff but as far as normal people go, any mistakes they make are correctable or at least forgivable
but if everyone was gone. that would make it all worthless. like, we'd never have even gone to the moon, much less would we ever send a robot to mars or eventually even make a colony on the planet, and every single accomplishment any human being has ever made in any field would be pointless
I have a hard enough time already dealing with the concept of one person dying