Show Posts

I see Aloveuality as a loveuality and an attachment to an already existing loveuality. For some they don't care for love, but they still like men or women.

aloveuality means you don't experience loveual attraction. you can still be romantically attracted to people, and some aloveual people can still have love, but some of them are averted to love too
aromantic is no romantic attraction, but loveual attraction is still there
you can also be both of course

Quote from: Harm94 on June 30, 2014, 05:19:12 PM

Also is foxscotch Night Fox? I thought his original account got unbanned.

well
I was unbanned
but then I wasn't

Quote from: sir dooble on June 30, 2014, 05:41:48 PM

It's okay, I'll outbreed his people.

one day gay guys will be able to make babies with each other, and we'll have to make up for all that lost time. then we'll see who outbreeds who >:)

23990

Off Topic / Re: Straight Megathread - i didn't expect to get this far

« on: June 30, 2014, 04:05:19 PM »

Quote from: Buu on June 30, 2014, 03:11:06 PM

All i'm wondering is if NF is actually bi.

pan to be specific

Quote from: sir dooble on June 30, 2014, 03:43:48 PM

That doesn't impact on the need to be proud of having a loveuality. Everyone has a loveuality (yes, I will class aloveuality as a loveuality). There's nothing to be proud of.

it's not pride about your loveuality, it's pride about overcoming that marginalization

Quote from: sir dooble on June 30, 2014, 03:43:48 PM

But if you're in a conversation and you just say "He's ace", then how is someone supposed to understand that it means "aloveual", unless you've already explained it to them alongside explaining what "aloveual" is (which isn't likely since most anyone you start a conversation with on this subject already knows what it means or can work it out).

this is easily corrected by them saying "what?" and you saying "aloveual"
it really is not a big deal

Quote from: sir dooble on June 30, 2014, 03:43:48 PM

What's with this? I've seen you do this a fair few times before in an argument, jumping to criticising someone for actually having a problem or opinion in the first place.

I can have my own opinion of the word. I'm not saying you can't use it. You can call yourself a loveual-teetotaller for all I care, but it doesn't mean I can't think your choice of words is stupid and egotistic.
I can have a complaint regardless of whether something affects me or not. It doesn't affect you that I have a complaint, so by your own logic, why do you have issue with me having an issue?
That view is illogical and silly. By the same standard I can't be an advocate for gay rights because it doesn't affect me as a straight person. But I don't think you'd be telling me off if that were the case.
Calm down a little bit more in arguments. Don't take it all so personally. I'm only here to enter friendly debate with people. I'm not on a personal crusade against you because we have differing opinons (especially when it's only an opinion on the use of a single word).

I know I can do that a lot, but I think this case is different. because when it comes to this, there's no reason for you to have an issue with it. one of your biggest reasons is that it's harder for them to use in a conversation, but not only is it not much harder for them at all, but it has nothing to do with you. and it's not even like gay rights, or whatever, those are situations where other people are being hurt for no reason

and, besides that, even if it was also a compliment for them, who cares? what's wrong with someone liking themselves?

Quote from: Plastiware on June 30, 2014, 03:48:04 PM