Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Shitty Puns

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5
46
Off Topic / Re: I just got $1000 for a laptop, what should I get?
« on: June 30, 2014, 03:28:43 PM »
you're probably the type of person who refuses to wear designer clothes for the same reasons lol
why the hell would you buy expensive designer clothes

47
...although youre better off getting an i3 if youre gaming

48
Off Topic / Re: Which of these GPUs
« on: June 30, 2014, 12:53:34 PM »
cept modern games still mainly depend on just clock speeds. not cores.
wrong. depend mostly on neither. why does an i3-4330 (2 cores/2 threads) clocked at 3.5GhZ outperform the FX-4300 (4 cores) clocked at 3.8GhZ???

i3 has a higher IPC, instructions per core. a single-core unit with an absurdly high IPC is theoretically the best option, but since technology constricts us, we made multiple cores as a work around. games typically use up 1 - 2 cores, newer games use up to 4, so if you have 4 excellent cores, you have a great gaming CPU. hence why the i5 is so popular, outperforms anything from AMD unless it is overclocked to the goddamn limits (IPC actually does depend on clock speeds)

49
Off Topic / Re: Which of these GPUs
« on: June 30, 2014, 12:32:24 PM »
this is because amd cant make stuff work on direct X. it has nothing o do with actual hardware specs. this is the fault of amd, not benchmarks.
why dont you instead complain that amd get up to modern gaming standards. we shouldnt have to downgrade the rest of the industry (yes these benchmark sites are part of the industry) to meet a low standard of a specific company.

the problem isnt really that the 295x2 is so weak.
how exactly is AMD's new Hawaii XT GPU even outdated? or any of last 2 - 3 gen AMD's chips for that matter.

 those synthetic benchmarks are obviously forgeted up anyways... tell me how the Nvidia Titan Z is below the R9 295x2 when it should be far superior? passmark benchmarks seem to generally biased against AMD, and dual-gpu cards are just completely messed up. just seems like a poorly-optimized synthetic benchmark

its that amd wants to claim last gen hardware should be top tier and price as such.
tell me about it. you can get an R9 290 for $370 (went as low as $320 recently) nowadays, which is on par with the GTX 780 (at $500). R9 290X for $450, which is just like 5% percent behind the GTX 780 Ti ($700), matches at 4k resolution due to superior bus width and VRAM amount. dont even get me started on lower-end cards lol

hey while we are at it did you know a gtx 295 can keep up with an r9 280x
it even beats the 660 in benchmarks lol

old graphic cards are weird
bullstuff

older cards tend to run clocks higher and easier. they just lack memory.

newer cards just keep adding cores and memory. its much less power and heat hungry.
GTX 295 has FAR lower clocks than most modern cards

http://www.geforce.com/hardware/desktop-gpus/geforce-gtx-295/specifications

yeah i mean 300 watts to get the forgeter running lol
lol you think thats a lot for a dual-GPU card?

i was reading that nvidias 800 series are going to be much less power needing.
the new re-released 750ti's use that same tech.
yes, maxwell architecture, supposedly will be the first to be built in 20nm

50
Off Topic / Re: Which of these GPUs
« on: June 30, 2014, 12:06:39 PM »
the numbers on those sites pretty legitimately reflect gpu performances.
not even close. for example, the R9 295X2, which is the best gaming video card on the market accessible to consumers, (besides the Titan Z, but that thing is handicapped, useless in every way) is supposedly 14% WORSE than the GTX 780. while in real life it has been shown that it performs around 100% to 200% BETTER in games

51
Off Topic / Re: Which of these GPUs
« on: June 30, 2014, 11:56:52 AM »
http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/

This should answer any performance related questions when comparing cards and prices.
stuffty site which does not reflect actual performance you would see in games/other applications

do not ever use videocardbenchmark, cpubenchmark, etc

52
Off Topic / Re: I just got $1000 for a laptop, what should I get?
« on: June 30, 2014, 11:54:31 AM »
if you want a laptop good for life stuff but also wouldl ike to use it somewhat for games, get a macbook
inb4appletooexpensive
why would you get a macbook for games over a windows laptop lol? makes no sense, games is one of the reasons NOT to buy a macbook

especially if you also consider that you can get far superior hardware in a windows laptop than a macbook for the same price

and that far less games are supported

53
Off Topic / Re: Which of these GPUs
« on: June 30, 2014, 10:25:11 AM »
IMO if crossfiring is still as stuffty as it used to be ~2 years ago you'd be better off with a single card
fairly sure it has been fixed through updates, its fine now

microstuttering is a pain in the ass
its supposedly only a real problem nowadays below 30 FPS afaik

plus a majority of games dont really support crossfire that well
pretty much all AAA games support it. those that don't aren't typically beautiful enough to need 2 video cards to run smoothly anyways

but then again i haven't ever crossfired, so all of the above might be total bs

54
Off Topic / Re: Which of these GPUs
« on: June 30, 2014, 10:19:23 AM »
http://www.ncixus.com/products/?sku=91053&promoid=1413&gclid=CMH8mIDyob8CFUIQ7AodES4ASA

280x for $230, but yeah go for the 280 if you can't afford that  it will fit right in your price range
oh wow thats quite nice. im going to be able to spend around $400 on a video card and i was thinking the R9 290, but two R9 280X's are also something to think about

55
Off Topic / Re: I just got $1000 for a laptop, what should I get?
« on: June 30, 2014, 10:12:11 AM »
13-inch MacBook Air
yeah op get this, its a great option for hipsters

56
Off Topic / Re: Which of these GPUs
« on: June 30, 2014, 10:10:55 AM »
Go for a r9 270x or a r9 280x if youre looking around $200 price range, you can find a 280x for around 220 if its on a nice sale
generally you would be looking at the R9 280 at that price range. R9 280X (X at the end, slightly different model) is typically around $250, i haven't seen it below $220 on sale so it might be slightly out of OP's league

57
Off Topic / Re: Which of these GPUs
« on: June 30, 2014, 09:03:15 AM »
>750ti
why would you not
because a 750 ti is a horrible option at $200? and at $150, too. only good if you find one on sale at around $100, otherwise, there are way better cards around

OP, if you don't mind doing rebates, theres a $70 Powercolor R7 260X on newegg, it will smoke through source games at a VERY high FPS (hell, i can pretty much max out TF2 at 60FPS with Intel HD 4600, source engine runs great on anything)

59
Off Topic / Re: rip keyboard
« on: June 29, 2014, 06:55:46 AM »
it was raisin bran, wasn't it????



look at that jolly motherforgeter

but do not worry, you can get a bran new keyboard later

60
Games / Re: Rise of Nations: Extended Edition
« on: June 28, 2014, 04:33:07 PM »
So it's basically multi-era'd Age of Empires?
similar. a lot of basic mechanics are different though and there are a lot of new things, like cities and territory, more resources (they're infinite though) and they work differently, rare resources, more researching, government types, and other stuff as well

its like civilization mechanics combined with age of empires combat and RTS aspect



stuffty pun tax

whats the worst kind of ache?
ache of empires///


Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5