61
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
lol do you not know the definition of mortality in this contextOnly 153 cases have run through their course, not 4,500. What part of that do you not understand?
this isn't even true unless it's based on people that didn't even receive treatment because of there being patient bed shortages. even then this seems wrongok handicap, mortality rate is based on without treatment and then with treatment for certain infections.
i dont know where you heard this but this isnt true at alllearn to math moron you take the dead and then divide it by the dead and recovered combine, theres 85 dead and 60 recovered. that’s 85/145 which would net you around 60%
isn't the coronavirus usually non-fatal if treated? afaik they don't have enough beds for patients with how widespread it is, and the panic caused by China trying to censor how severe the outbreak is certainly adds to the panic.https://ncbiinsights.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2020/01/13/novel-coronavirus/
imo this is being blown out of proportionNot really considering that the mortality rate is currently hovering around 50% and plus most infections arent being reported.
have youi’m asking you
youre projecting, u got something we need to talk about?tbf have u even had love