Messages

2851

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 05:23:48 PM »

i redacted a statement in one of my posts, yet you quoted it anyway

Sorry, didn't mean to do that. Sometimes it keeps the quote the same once you post the quote.

no it shouldnt. unless its killing people in waves, its not a big enough blip on peoples radars to worry. its just big enough for people to get their panties in a bunch about it, but people arent gonna obstain from it just because the risk is slightly higher. people dont operate that way

"really wanting to do" something is also the root of all sorts of great stuff too

One activity doesn't kill people, the other does. The risk of acquiring diseases should be a "big enough blip" on someone's radar.
But of course people don't operate that way. Just another one of those evolutionary imperfections, right?

Really wanting to do something that is inherently harmful for the sake of temporary satisfaction is just a bad idea.

2852

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 05:10:33 PM »

itd probably be easier if frequency would stop editing in points to address after hes posted

I only did this once, at the top of the previous page.

using incorrect quotes

Huh?

ok but gay love doesnt kill a threatening amount of people. theres no reason humans as a species shouldnt have gay love. just because the risk is higher doesnt mean its high enough to ward of people who really want to do it

It doesn't, but the fact it does at all should be a red flag.

"Really wanting to do" something is the root of all sorts of negative stuff.

some guys tried to gang-rape a man named Lot and in that time period a male raping a male was a way of shaming them

From the account, it looks like they wanted to have love with the people who were with Lot, and when Lot tried to convince them not to be loving gross, they got angry and decided to try and assault Lot instead.

2853

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 05:03:35 PM »

Lol

frequency is in denial about his true love
sucking richards

you got me

2854

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 04:57:59 PM »

im simply pointing out humans are a conscious enough species to be aware of their imperfections and what they can lead to. even if those imperfections come from how we've evolved

I'm still not sure of the point you're trying to get across. Humans are sapient, animals are not. A consciousness of evolution is not apparent in either, and if evolution were conscious (which it would need to be for it to be a possible explanation for life at all), it's doing a terrible job considering that the majority of mutations are imperfections.
And since humans are conscious enough to be aware of their imperfections and what they can lead to, then there would be more reason to avoid homoloveuality for the sake of self-preservation.

2855

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 04:49:38 PM »

the stereotypical "having love with inmates in jail" can typically be seen as a power move. its why "making someone your bitch" is a saying

Oh yeah.
But giving into loveual desires and loving the nearest living thing to relieve yourself doesn't seem to relate to "determining an overabundance of reproduction" and "rethinking what they know about [reproduction] and approaching things differently."

uh

its in the bible actually

For the sake of asserting dominance? I'd like to know which passage.

2856

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 04:43:12 PM »

because homoloveual behavior doesn't always stem from homoloveual tendencies. some animals mate with the same love as a display of power and authority. that same mindset exists in humans as well

I've never seen a man who wanted to have love with another man because it was a power move.

2857

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 04:40:07 PM »

humans are conscious creatures who can determine the implications of their actions far into the future. we can determine an overabundance of reproduction could lead to problems around the world. thats not going to stop reproduction, but thats definitely gonna make people rethink what they know about it and approach things differently

So why would animals display homoloveual behavior because humans are sapient? Does that mean humans decide to be homoloveual so they don't contribute to overpopulation?

A species being conscious doesn't relate to the phenomena we see in each species. Evolution cannot be conscious in any regard.

2858

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 04:34:31 PM »

do you think a conscious species cant come to that conclusion on their own? id wager to say evolution is a conscious process in that regard

So what exactly are you implying?

2859

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 04:28:38 PM »

that's.. not relevant. they're bad people. i can find dozens of articles about heteroloveual parents abusing their children, too. there isn't a correlation.

My point is that straying from God's standards results in degeneracy in every facet.
Not that you believe in God.

if you don't want to be biased, then link directly to the studies or find an unbiased source

I didn't intend to be biased, but all of their sources were listed so I figured you could refer to those.

??

Unless evolution was a conscious process, it would not be able to determine that a species can be too reproductive.

2860

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 04:06:29 PM »

Guess the only solution to homoloveuality is to kill myself. Thanks for the heads up, Frequency!

Well I don't think God appreciates Self Delete either but hey, no prOblem my dude.

2861

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 04:02:21 PM »

this is just degeneracy, nothing to do with homoloveuality. what are you on

Where do you think "degeneracy" came from. and no, i'm not implying from homoloveuality

this entire website is totally broken but it's obviously very Christian-oriented. please use good sources.

Like the sources they linked?

that would not be contrary to nature, correct? you are disproving yourself

For such a specific psychological defect to be in play, some kind of conscious providence would have to be involved because "evolution" would manifest entirely differently.

2862

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 03:50:17 PM »

We've got 7 billion people already, we're not going to really suffer if maybe 1-5% of them don't want to reproduce. You have people who abstain from reproduction for other reasons and they're not slammed for it.

The people abstaining from reproduction aren't dumping genetic material into the exit point of the digestive system.

2863

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 03:46:50 PM »

can you prove that gay families are less stable

yea
https://secure.websrvcs.com/templates/System/details.asp?id=25220&PID=395136

literally yes
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homoloveual_behavior_in_animals
http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150206-are-there-any-homoloveual-animals
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/magazine/04animals-t.html
http://www.yalescientific.org/2012/03/do-animals-exhibit-homoloveuality/

And I'm guessing it's a part of evolution to keep species from overpopulating, right?

then "it goes against nature" isn't an argument either

People complaining about "it goes against nature" should probably get off their computer and go live in a forest.

The nature of a species is to ensure its survival and growth.

2864

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 03:27:21 PM »

not exclusive to gay people

Literally a higher chance of contracting STDs.

yet it's a part of nature

Because some animals are gay, right?

the 1950s american family model is horsestuff.

It was stable and stability promotes positive psychological benefits.

2865

Off Topic / Re: Is it okay to be Gay?

« on: September 14, 2016, 03:17:20 PM »

Can someone atleast explain to me why being gay is not okay? (And don't include biblical reasons)

stds, contrary to nature, destroys "the family" and forms unstable relationships that ultimately hurt either party.

but hey #loveislove 👩‍👩‍👦‍👦👩‍👩‍👦‍👦👩‍👩‍👦‍👦