Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - PhantOS

Pages: 1 ... 495 496 497 498 499 [500] 501 502 503 504 505 ... 740
7486
it's still a richard
yeah well a boy with a vagina is still a vagina

7487
because like it totally is
i mean we all touch our snakees like 20 times a day, there's nothing gay about touching a girls snake

7488
i mean, would masturbating to boys with vaginas be gay?

7489
If you're born with a vagina or egg producing reproductive organs, you're female. Female love characteristics take priority over male, which is why it's physically impossible to be born a male with female characteristics, but you can be born female with male characteristics

It's why hermaphrodites are girls, not boys. Though biologically speaking, they are neither male or female but just possess dominantly female characteristics. Or maybe their genitalia development failed

7490
the idea of nonbinary genders exists only in social sciences (not an exact science)
Social science isn't an exact science? The forget is this supposed to mean? Are you saying the entire field that studies how humans interact with each other and form societies is just a made up science? That's if i said "rain exists only in meteorology but it's not an exact science so rain doesn't exist". Maybe i'm misinterpreting this wrong and you're saying that social science is a broad category of other sciences, and in that case, nonbinary genders exist in demography, sociology and to some extent psychology.

Autism aside, you're essentially saying "nonbinary genders exist in the only science that studies human interaction and societal patterns, the only field of study that would have credibility on the mater" but i guess if it's not a real science it wouldn't matter to you anyways

1. MMMMM that sweet appeal to authority
i had this same issue with corderlain. since he can't argue against a credible source, his only tactic is to either say it's a liberal fake or to blame me for using a credible source. i guess you're doing the latter

anyways, WHO has scientists and professors around the world that publish thousands of abstracts every day, they work with millions of people to tackle health and societal issues. if you're going to just selectively say 'they're right on everything except this thing i dont agree with' then you're essentially throwing consistency out the window. They could be wrong on a number of things, but an agency that has a need to handle health information at such a high magnitude would have such an unlikely chance of being incorrect on the matter, and if they are they've probably revised it by now

2. Gender itself is not a social construct. Male and female cannot be changed on society's whim. What can be changed are their roles, and how masculinity and femininity are perceived.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijra_(South_Asia)
this is half gender being defined by society and half masculinity and femininity being defined by society. They both go hand in hand anyways, since masculinity and femininity are part of gender identification. You're essentially trying to prove me wrong but in reality you're just proving me right on a certain aspect. I do agree on the fact that gender roles are defined by society, but most institutions recognize that as an offshoot of gender identification, and it falls in the same category

Gender is just a definition, it doesn't exist until we give it meaning. The meaning most if not all of the scientific community have given it is a set of societal definitions that affect how people identify. It changes from society to society, so it's not just Male & female all around, people in different countries have a different definition of those roles in their society. Either way, more than two genders can exist, and it already does in some countries like india. Just because it doesn't fit your extremely narrow criteria doesn't mean that it's factually incorrect

7491
So far your only argument is "gender and love are the same thing" which is objectively incorrect. Fortunately, the civilized world bases its laws around proven facts nowadays and not 4chan opinions, which is why laws in several countries acknowledge the definition of gender.

If you want to fight against it so bad and play pretend, go move back into the 18th century or some stuff. Until you invent a time machine, you won't be able to selectively dictate what facts are true and false

Quote
The distinction between love and gender differentiates love (the anatomy of an individual's reproductive system, and secondary love characteristics) from gender, which can refer to either social roles based on the love of the person (gender role) or personal identification of one's own gender based on an internal awareness (gender identity).

7492
Unless you can prove that snakees and pussies are manufactured, then gender is not a social construct.
Gender has nothing to do with your genitalia and the fact that you're trying to make up your own definition is hilarious.

Leave it to you to make up your own rules and shame people for not abiding by them. You sound just like a libtard

7493
It's also child abuse to let a child mutilate their body because of a choice they made on a whim.
Is it child abuse to acknowledge a child's identity too because you seem to think that accepting gender and mutilating body parts are the same thing

Source?
http://www.who.int/gender-equity-rights/understanding/gender-definition/en/
these are the same people that provide abstracts on malaria and ebola in africa and are essentially responsible for raising awareness for every known disease and health issue that plagues humanity. if you fight against WHO's credibility you might as well be saying that vaccines give you autism

Either way its jumping the gun, and its not the same as not accepting a mental disorder, its more like not being allowed to accept a mental disorder and forcing people to bend reality so their children can live a fantasy.
the only people bending reality would be the people that deny that gender is a social construct

7494
Add-Ons / Re: Lil' Shotguns
« on: June 07, 2017, 08:13:33 AM »
u should make a lil' uzi
yuh yuh yuh yuh yuh

7495
Modification Help / Re: How does code on playertypes work?
« on: June 07, 2017, 07:07:39 AM »
PlayerstandardArmor.dump();

Checking movement is a little hacky without client scripts, the best thing you can do is use Player::getVelocity(); to help with that.

Here's an example player loop:

function Player::moveloop(%this)
{
       announce(%this.getVelocity());
       %this.moveloop = %this.schedule(1000,moveloop);
}


if you want to cancel it type cancel(findclientbyname(yourname).player.moveloop); in console

7496
If my child was autistic and i refused to acknowledge their mental differences even if it's been medically determined then that's legally child neglect. Canada's just trying to be consistent and some conservatives here are throwing a fit because a country with their own freedom to decide laws is going against their viewpoint

Either way it's been medically and scientifically proven that gender is a social definition so i doubt that it falls into the category of a mental difference anymore

It's another to feed into delusions of nonbinary genders.
The illusion most of the civilized world and scientific community acknowledges is true. If you want to play pretend and act like there aren't more than two genders that's fine, but nobody is going to pander to your refusal to accept the truth. Life moves on.

7497
Off Topic / Re: Who are you favorite musical artists/bands?
« on: June 06, 2017, 08:59:14 PM »

7498
Creativity / Re: The new and improved 3D model topic!
« on: June 06, 2017, 06:27:00 PM »
nice pwnfuls

7499
Off Topic / Re: sculptgl thread v999
« on: June 06, 2017, 12:35:49 PM »


issa skull

7500
So you bumped an even older topic just to spite me?
There's nothing wrong with bumping. If badspot wanted bumping to not exist he would make the "topic too old" happen sooner

Pages: 1 ... 495 496 497 498 499 [500] 501 502 503 504 505 ... 740