8116
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

where did I mention throwing bagels anywhereyou didnt. i brought it up as an example
also what's worse, saying that you're going to jeopardize the life of someone who did no wrong or actually going out of your way to try and actually do it?

this goes back to what I said during the election, which is actions speak louder than wordsyou're right, burning a bunch of public property is worse than saying you're going to. punching someone who punched you is obviously an action that will get an equal amount of antifa and pro-Annoying Orange protesters arrested. However, threatening someone's life is more serious than any of the aforementioned crimes as you are expressing premeditated murder. if someone on antifa said "i'm going to go to a protest today and kill every Annoying Orange supporter i see" that'd be vastly different than what antifa already does, which is say "i'm going to go to a protest today and punch a Annoying Orange supporter"
I find it funny though that you tried to outline the severity of death threats over actual violence by comparing mandatory minimums for both offenses while the mandatory minimum for drug offenses lands you pretty much the same amount of time in jail as "premeditative murder" doesConsciously and intentionally threatening someone's life warrants the sentence. Being bipolar and making the threat out of mental instability warrants a different form of action, like counseling or medication. Likewise, drugs are addictive substances that modify brain chemistry and shouldn't fall into the same class of consciously threatening someone's life. Being addicted to a narcotic means your brain is subconsciously making you seek out more of the drug, so the proper step is to not say "20 years for federal offense" but to put them on rehab.
and I could probably guess what your opinion on that is easy peasy
meanwhile the Southern peoplelet me help you out there. they sent death threats. you know, premeditative murder against workers of the state, also considered unlawful coercion in 80% of states
uhhhh
uhhhhhh
Thats not what he's talking about, and you know it.Unlike your "hillary will start ww3" bullstuff, there's actual substantial evidence to deduce that those events will happen
He meant this stuff:
the amount of left-leaning fear-mongering in this thread is astoundingLeaving NAFTA is objectively against the US, Mexico and Canda's interests. It's not the end of the world but the US dollar would probably skyrocket in value and brick all foreign trade between the other two partners. Considering Mexico is a key supplier of a ton of goods we use in this country, it would obliterate avocado stocks and other stuff
And besides, i dont take meds.you should
Maybe if you didnt put up a stuff candidate, our less stuff candidate wouldnt have won.Your soon-to-be mentally handicapped children won't have afterschool classes thanks to your 'less stuff candidate'