16
Off Topic / Re: Feminists Celebrate loveually Transmitted Diseases!
« on: April 15, 2016, 01:27:13 PM »Explain.when feminists talk about people saying "I would never date a fat/black/trans person"/"I find all fat/black/trans people ugly" they're not saying you're obliged to date any random fat/black/trans person or find any random fat/black/trans person attractive, but rather that you really shouldn't make such broad blanket statements. You can't possibly know that you wouldn't ever date a fat/black/trans person or find a fat/black/trans person attractive because you couldn't have possibly seen every such person, let alone gotten to know them well (This is especially true in the case of trans people because many trans people pass well enough that people don't even realize they're trans). I used to think that I would never find a black woman attractive until I got to be good friends with one and realized that I did actually become attracted to her, though we never dated.
Studies have proven that the pay gap is not due to loveism though, so it's pointless for feminists to get uptight about it.you also don't know what you're talking about.
The common """""debunking""""" of the 77-cent wage gap figure explains that the gap is a product of women's choices, because women tend to choose lower-paying jobs. In fact, the original study that produced this figure discussed this. This explanation is not the end of the discussion but rather the start. Here's an incredibly thorough research publication discussing the pay gap, and Here's an article written by two women with Ph.D.s in economics who are far more qualified to have this discussion than either of us is.
anyways i dont get why these "feminists" support STDs when they damage the body... what? There's a difference between supporting people who have STDs and supporting STDs, you dork.