76
Drama / Re: Yoke As A Host
« on: December 15, 2015, 07:37:19 PM »you still don't know me. You're argument
please you're talking like an older riki2321
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
please you're talking like an older riki2321
78
Drama / Re: Yoke As A Host
« on: December 15, 2015, 07:27:19 PM »Akio, for someone like you to make such a statement clearly indicates what kind of person you really are.what audacity i must have , what a villain i am for calling some arrogant guy arrogant.
For you to sit there and judge me when you don't even know the slightest thing about me shows your dull way of reasoning in this manner. How about you actually sit down and talk to someone first before spitting nonsense out over the internet when you clearly have no clue about whats going on or the backstory.I was admin at your knifing server for a few weeks until I got tired of you. None of these other admins I have seen yet so far in your server.
Arrogant? I am no better than anyone in this community nor have I ever consider myself such. Every single person involved in this community has the ability to achieve anything they set their minds to. There are many, many intelligent and smart individuals among us. (this is bullstuff) This statement is not only restricted to this community either, but in general speaking.re-read my above statement.
this is none of your business If you want to throw ignorant insults at me, you can do so as you please until your eyes change all colors throughout the rainbow spectrum.i was too lazy to go through and edit the quotes more and more. bold responses.
is this the third grade? it's a public thread, i was former staff at your server. i have every right to post in this thread about you as you have every right to about me.
I've already worked things through with the person who conducted this topic. Again, you don't know the backstory to this situation nor do you know how either of us composed ourselves during the event, and I am not required to explain or brief any of it to you either.
so why put this out there if you wont bother proving anything? why am i inclined to believe anything you say here if you aren't inclined to post any evidence?
I already addressed what I had to address nearing around the time this topic was conducted. Everything I'm saying right now is obviously directed towards you since you have the audacity to make accusations and throw rocks.
please
79
Off Topic / Re: whats the worst thing uve done
« on: December 15, 2015, 05:53:00 PM »
accidentally gunned down a family of 5 ni-- african americans
80
Games / Re: osu! megathread v3 - OP completed a undertale skin (page 31)
« on: December 15, 2015, 05:51:30 PM »
81
Games / Re: osu! megathread v3 - OP completed a undertale skin (page 31)
« on: December 15, 2015, 04:53:38 PM »82
Off Topic / Re: 6 / 2(2+1)
« on: December 15, 2015, 04:52:40 PM »
it's different if you write it as 6 / (2(2+1))
83
Games / Re: Super Smash Bros. Megathread - anime sword fighter emporium
« on: December 15, 2015, 04:20:09 PM »
great now the hacker is gonna start playing this
84
Games / Re: osu! megathread v3 - OP completed a undertale skin (page 31)
« on: December 15, 2015, 04:16:24 PM »
its a joke cause we have the same acc
85
Games / Re: osu! megathread v3 - OP completed a undertale skin (page 31)
« on: December 15, 2015, 04:08:38 PM »
tfw you rape jon
me:
jon:
me:
jon:
86
Off Topic / Re: "Political Compass" test
« on: December 15, 2015, 04:04:05 PM »
I'm pretty much exactly where I was last thread.
87
Off Topic / Re: CIA releases new "music video" warning of attack on Moscow
« on: December 15, 2015, 03:45:41 PM »
so thats what the inside of a neck looks like
88
Off Topic / Re: 6 / 2(2+1)
« on: December 15, 2015, 03:40:51 PM »
i don't understand what you mean, i intended it to be in quotations
89
Off Topic / Re: 6 / 2(2+1)
« on: December 15, 2015, 03:38:54 PM »Quote
The problem as it is written is 6÷2(1+2) , the ÷ cannot be substituted with a fraction bar because they have different ranks on the order of operations. It is an illegal math move to do this. The bar ranks with parentheses, ÷ is interchangeable with *. therefore the problem must be solved as 6÷2(1+2) NOT 6 (over) 2(1+2) we do the parentheses first, so 6÷2(3), the parentheses are now no longer relevant, because the number inside is in it's simplest form. Every single number has implied parentheses around it.
6÷2(3)
(6) ÷(2)(3)
6÷2*3,
or even converting the division to multiplication by a reciprocal (a legal math move)
(6)(1 (over) 2)(3)
are all correct ways to write this problem and mean exactly the same thing. Using pemdas, where md and as are interchangeable, we work from left to right, so (3)(3) or
3*3= 9
Just because something is implied rather than written does not give it any special rank in the order of operations.
The problem in it's simplest form, with nothing implied would look like this:
(1+1+1+1+1+1 (over) 1) ÷ (1+1 (over) 1) * ((1(over) 1) + (1+1 (over) 1))
From here, nothing is implied, This again, works out to 9.
If the symbol '/' was used this whole debate would be ambiguous since that symbol can mean "to divide by" or it could mean a fraction bar.
HOWEVER, because the ÷ symbol is used, it can not be changed to mean a fraction bar because that would change the order of operations and thus the whole problem, you can't change a symbol to mean something because you want to, in doing so you are changing the problem.
Once and for all, the answer is 9.
90
Off Topic / Re: 6 / 2(2+1)
« on: December 15, 2015, 03:27:09 PM »
im not handicapped i know how it actually works i'm trying to generate discussion as to people put either answer